I like your comment about the thread having to be ruled like a nazi. I read this and used what freedom of thought I have left to make a connection between the idea of a dictatorship, and science. What can be accepted more as the unbreakable dictator of our world than science. This is something no government can argue with "in court". (I also like what I heard about the judiciary) So the only alternative for these people and institutions, with their agendas, is to falsify studies, hide information from the public, with the excuse that they are our parents.
If science will dictate the good/bad effects of different substances on the human body, the only way to protect the people is to research. I find it interesting that this "yes its bad/no it isn't" shit has been going on for so many years, and now this shit with the monkeys and the methamphetamine 8) MDMA has been in large scale use since the 80's, over 20 years, where are all these brain dead people at? I understand they could just have minor damage like mood swings or memory loss, but whats with all the conflicting studies, all done by scientists! If some brain damage is going on, it should be enough to swing most of these studies in support of the DEA, especially after 20 years.
Another note: this research would cost very little money, and compare that to the 500 billion or so were spending in Iraq, it all seems rediculous.
If science will dictate the good/bad effects of different substances on the human body, the only way to protect the people is to research. I find it interesting that this "yes its bad/no it isn't" shit has been going on for so many years, and now this shit with the monkeys and the methamphetamine 8) MDMA has been in large scale use since the 80's, over 20 years, where are all these brain dead people at? I understand they could just have minor damage like mood swings or memory loss, but whats with all the conflicting studies, all done by scientists! If some brain damage is going on, it should be enough to swing most of these studies in support of the DEA, especially after 20 years.
Another note: this research would cost very little money, and compare that to the 500 billion or so were spending in Iraq, it all seems rediculous.
