housefreeeek
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2001
- Messages
- 417
I suppose it is different in the US but the in the UK we are protected by European Privacy laws which ensures that the type of thing that goes on in America can't happen too easily over here.
Originally posted by SgtD82:
I'm not saying that there aren't easier ways of doing it. My point is that for every new form of communication used, there are agencies who are going to learn how to exploit every aspect of that technology. There's no limit on how they can use this knowledge. Feel violated????
[ 26 May 2002: Message edited by: SgtD82 ]
In the US, they don't have to worry about finding how to tap into new forms of communication. They passed a law which forces the phone companies to provide them with ways to tap them.
This is known as CALEA...
Originally posted by Cokeboy:
Don't text-message anything you wouldn't say if a cop were standing next to you, listening.[/QB]
Thats the best advice on this thread. Same applies to ANY form of electronic communication. Establish code words (ie "I want to pick up 5 CDs from you"), but NOT obvious ones like "beans".
Originally posted by La_casper:
[QB]
now does the same hold true for people with the nextel/2-way radio jobies???
I am guessing, but I believe those use publicly owned airwaves, so a warrent wouldn't be needed to monitor them. also someone above mentioned incriminating messages on message boards; it brings to mind the new abuses being pushed through for the FBI, part of which state they would monitor public buildings and websites. Of course these are supposed to be powers created just to fight terrorism, but logically it is only a matter of time before they will be applied to "crime"