• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

CE&P social thread: why do the people I disagree with hate freedom so much?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Upper division writing exam tomorrow, I need to pas to graduate on time.

I got this shit NP.
 
^The government paid for much of my education in the first place, which will allow me to pay 25% of my $70k salary in taxes. Opposed to 10% of my $16k salary. I'd say it's a fair trade off.
 
I guarantee when you guys get out into the real world granted you arnt going the professional student route you will change your views when you see the government obliterate your paycheck in taxes.

Considering you think im a single mom living on welfare, im not too bothered about your predictions regarding my future.

The way I see it, government is largely responsible for my success. Without roads to drive on, law enforcement to protect my rights, sanitary public utilities, national defense and security ect I wouldnt be where I am today. I will more than likely be making a good living after college, and Ill be ok sparing some of that so that the next generation will have the same opportunities, especially since they will be the ones paying into the government programs that benefit the elderly when im in my old age.

Regarding my test..... easiest writing assignment ive had in years. My class writing assignments are always so boring and rigid compared to this, it was almost fun. On the first essay they asked me to respond to some libertarian trash advocating for unrestricted advertising for alcohol/tobacco companies, I raped his argument pretty well IMO. The second one was about what, if any, role government should play in financing higher education.

Both are things im familiar with, were relatively open ended, and were pretty similar to the shit I like to talk about on this forum. Easy peasy. A passing grade is worth 3 units and fulfills a graduation requirement.
 
Last edited:
the only possible relevance one's occupation has to their ideology are measures of things like hypocrisy/commitment/apathy/whatever. They have little to do with the point being made (unless someone's suggesting they're, individually, of significant relevance/influence to their point)
/still entertaining or enlightening, but wrt an idea's merit, they're as relevant as an ad hom (so long as this person is not an integral part of their point)
 
The point is that Droppers pushes paper for the government all the while complaining about government spending. In the minds of most small government advocates (who dont really understand the government at all past the fact that they take some of their money) people like him are the problem, yet he has the audacity (stupidity?) to take their side.

If libertarians ran the government, you wouldn't have a job Droppers.
 
He's spoken generally of his desk job for the government in previous threads.
 
I work the blue collar area of government work as I interact with people daily and often see the Appalachian distaste for regulation which is very uncomfortable at times. I like my job and do it very efficiently as I pride myself in my work. I am one of the few that practices what he preaches. Ken when you enter the real word try getting a government job it isnt easy
 
I work the blue collar area of government work as I interact with people daily and often see the Appalachian distaste for regulation which is very uncomfortable at times. I like my job and do it very efficiently as I pride myself in my work. I am one of the few that practices what he preaches. Ken when you enter the real word try getting a government job it isnt easy

i don't know what any of that means and am a retard. can you elaborate?
/my only governmental job was the easiest paid-work i've ever done.
 
yes i know that- he's not advocating anarchism, so the sole fact of "working for the state" is in and of itself meaningless.

It's hypocritical to argue against taxes generally and accept them as a salary at the same time. Especially after choosing a public sector job over a private sector job, where he could have just as easily made a living without relying on the taxpayer for his income. Especially while income taxes haven't been lower in decades, especially while advocating less government expenditure during a fiscal crisis. It stems from a comment about entering the real world and being screwed by taxes, therefore changing political orientation, coming from someone earning a living collecting the very same tax dollars.
 
i don't disagree it's hypocritical- i just meant that such hypocrisy (whether there or not) only has bearing on his character and no direct bearing on the right/wrong of, well, the shit he says. accordingly it's trivia/entertainment/lulz/etc but isn't a rebuttal, not in the way ppl try to use it..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top