treezy z
Bluelighter
How convenient. The DEA wants to ban kratom, meets popular opposition, and all of a sudden the shit turns poisonous.
How convenient. The DEA wants to ban kratom, meets popular opposition, and all of a sudden the shit turns poisonous.
Big pharma MUST want to patent it and make their own formula for prescription right?
I mean it's too good an opportunity to pass up
There was enough popular pushback that the DEA didn't ban it after the first comment period.
If this were 1985 I would agree. It would be labeled narcotic and that is that. However over time and having congressman and senators writing letters to leave it and study it helped to back off. I understand a few senators had family members that utilized kratom.
And then there is the AKA. Mycophile is correct. We should donate. Look at the NRA. Kids are getting killed and they won't budge. So the AKA is a good force that has momentum. Momentum is what we want. Kratom could very well just stay herbal like kava. Kava almost got banned years ago with the liver scares but was backed off. I even think the salmonella issue is flushing out the leaf is not deadly if that is all they got. Banning it outright is too obnoxious now.
I agree with Mycophile. I use to skip Mycophile posts. You use to make kratom look scary.But I read them again ever since you stopped kratom and came back and said it was easier than you thought. So I agree and glad I read your posts again. Donating the AKA is a good thing to do. So far we are winning this using a little money and momentum.