Not being allowed to research schedule I drugs is and has been a complete travesty.Imo the "research branch" of corporate healthcare is problematic. This impacts everything including ADHD and cannabis medications (eg Dronabinol, Epidyolex, Sativex, Rimbonant).
The origins of corporate healthcare are outlined here, some excerpts:
https://meridianhealthclinic.com/how-rockefeller-created-the-business-of-western-medicine/
I think there is less corporate influence on academic research than this implies. I have been in a few well funded labs and the only private money they took was from foundations like HHMI. I know professors who have formed companies from the basis of their academic research, and they deeply believe they are helping people, not just keeping them sick.
Greed drives everybody, but I have never understood why alternative medicines are treated as ideologically pure where medical doctors are keeping us sick for profit.
That article acts like the loss of homeopathy from modern medicine is a shame. Do you think homeopathy has any place in evidence based medicine?
I also feel that alternative medicine providers like the one you quoted are just as guilty for selling hogwash due to a profit motive (and worse, they don’t ever need to demonstrate safety or efficacy).
What do you mean by this? Research on BDNF being a hub of SSRI action was carried out by publically funded labs across the world, as is the oxidative stress-hormesis model of statins.Imo the "research branch" of corporate healthcare
This work was done much later in part to answer questions brought up by other work (why do cetp inhibitors have no effect on mortality even though they lower ldl and raise hdl) (why do ssris have such a lag time, and what is the molecular mechanism of depression).
Last edited:
