• MDMA &
    Empathogenic
    Drugs

    Welcome Guest!
  • MDMA Moderators: Esperighanto

bk-MDMA methylone being sold as "molly"

I hope bk-MDMA was just a fad. It sucks compared to mdxx.

Most things in life suck compared to MDxx.. lmao. That doesn't mean it isn't worthwhile on it's own, as long as you know what it is.



The biggest problem with methylone is the profit margins are like 3 times higher than MDMA.. obviously most dealers main incentive is to make money and there's no way the demand for pure MDMA is going to outsell the market that just doesn't give a flying fuck
 
It only lasts an hour and a half and is just a tease. Not satisfying enough. I agree with Laika: I hope it disappears.
 
methylone is a fun drug IMO, but does not compare to a solid dose of MDMA. i mean i have had some memorable times on MDPV or MDMC(methylone). it is really hard to come by real "molly" these days partly because molly just refers to any powder that resembles the effects of ecstasy. lucky for my leprechaun he has a solid connect for "real molly" around the clock (;
 
methylone is a fun drug IMO, but does not compare to a solid dose of MDMA. i mean i have had some memorable times on MDPV or MDMC(methylone). it is really hard to come by real "molly" these days partly because molly just refers to any powder that resembles the effects of ecstasy. lucky for my leprechaun he has a solid connect for "real molly" around the clock (;
Leprechauns aren't real
 
sorry but in my case i enjoy methlyone......seems to be speedy but also has an empathy type affect like i love everyone around me and no one can xhange that....dont know if im an exception...but i love to roll regardless if its mdma...or a close second best..in my opinion..
 
Yeah that's why you don't buy anything at raves or from anyone who doesn't get it from overseas. I honestly got bored with MDMA a long time ago because I thought it made me feel too "cracked out" and made my eyes shake more than I'm okay with in comparison to MDA which is one of my favorite drugs of all time. Now look how silly that sounds these days. You'd be lucky to find speed capsules at a rave these days.
 
Interested to read all this - didn't know how common it was - heard not - but then since methylone is supposed to be similar why not.
Then an aquaintance got sold some Methylone as Molly. Real con - I agree it not a patch on Molly and the doses are high.
Surprised straight speed doesn't get passed off as pills/molly - easily obtained & gets you up happy and chatty - near as somethings that pass as Molly; it used to get pressed as pink pills - perhaps some were sold as Molly - who knows

Eitherway the person who got this thought it was good shit so like you say "kids these days don't know proper Molly"
At least I got to try Methylone I guess - it was a so so
 
Last edited:
To all the people who want methylone to go away:

It's not just gunna return to the glory all MDMA days, its gunna return to even nastier shittier RCs in pills and mollies.

Dealers seeking profit is inevitable, and at this point methylone is the absolute best thing they could be producing to profit on.

Besides, if you mix methylone and 4-fa....... (some like methylone a 6-apb)........ tell me that shit is really that diffeent from MDMA.
Well okay it is but it's a s close as you're probably gunna get! You guys wanna return to pillls being filled with piperazines, meth, caffiene, 2c-b, etc?
I sure don't.

And just for the record, pure MDMA is still available in the US. Only to a few who are in the know or the lucky NY recipients of the Holland shipments. So don't give up all hope.

But mostly importantly, don't shun methylone! Thank god it's here now instead of all that other crap!
 
The highest quality holland-shipped MDMA I've ever had looked very, very similar to the methylone I used to get. Clear shards with a pinkish tint. Looked like total RC garbage but was the cleanest and strongest roll I've had and tested pure.

MDMA comes in a wide variety of colors and shapes and so does methylone. The only way to really know is with a test kit.

That bieng said, talking specifically about methylone and MDMA assuming it's really only one or the other,

MDMA does not under any amount of pressure stick to itsself. Once broken or powdered it never seems to stick back together where methylone powder when pressed with the side of a lighter will stick back together and even form little clumps on the lighter that are pretty difficult to scrape off.

Methylone also has a very distinguishable awful chemical tast (like synthetic vomit) and is extremely unpleasant to swollow straighr, or if snorted the drip will without fail make every fiber of your bieng cringe and start gagging.

MDMA depending on the quality (pure bieng a very mild amphetamine taste combined with black licorice or lavender and impure having a little more bitter earthyness, like the smell of dirt turned into a flavor if that makes sense) is usually still unpleasant to most but nowhere near as bad and is more than managable to swollow without capsules plus the taste fades away more quickly. Its common for it to have a salty-metallic bite due to bieng cut with other amphetamines.

Once again, get a test kit, however knowing most people won't, flavor, smell, and stickyness are a good thing to go by. But never looks. So many kinds of methylone look like so many kinds of MDMA and vice versa.
 
Last edited:
Once again, get a test kit, however knowing most people won't, flavor, smell, and stickyness are a good thing to go by. But never looks. So many kinds of methylone look like so many kinds of MDMA and vice versa.
No they aren't. Those properties tell you absolutely nothing, any of those can be faked and is being faked. This is possible dangerous advice. Testkits are the ONLY way, there is no alternative. Don't want to test? Don't do drugs, simple
 
I very rarely choose to eat MDMA these days. But, my favorite MDMA ever was clear pink hued crystals. They were large chunks of crystal at the time and originated in the north west.Tested clean (reagent and gc/ms) and was a favorite of mine for a long time some years ago. I still see MDMA occasionally through friends who use it and i have seen it in more recent years (last year once). Sucks those didn't test clean. Do you have a picture of it? I am really curious to see, how the pink hued methylone, compares to the pink hued MDMA in looks.
I have not seen methylone in person. But, after reading your post I came across a picture of mixed hued methylone crystals that some had a pink hue. It was somewhat similar in color but, the MDMA was pretty clear vs. the methylone was pretty hazy and darker. maybe had more of an unnatural pink hue as well. .
I just posted about the the MDMA I used to get looking like the methylone I used to get before reading this.

The reason behind the "pink tinted shards" is that both MDMA and methylone in their purest form (my MDMA bieng 98.6% and my methylone bieng 99.2% ) look almost completely identical. Methylone is a slightly more fleshy pink and MDMA crystals are more see through and vibrant pink but to someone who hasn't looked at pure methylone and pure MDMA side by side its impossible to tell the difference. The only difference I found is that methylone powder is sticky when crushed and MDMA stubbornly stays powdered and doesn't clump or stick to itself when pressed at all.

The taste is also very different.
 
No they aren't. Those properties tell you absolutely nothing, any of those can be faked and is being faked. This is possible dangerous advice. Testkits are the ONLY way, there is no alternative. Don't want to test? Don't do drugs, simple

Not saying that you can detemine a chemical without a test kit. You can't.

But the reality of it is that most people who do "molly" will never even see this thread and are blindly eating chemicals with no knowledge about MDMA or methylone and won't have any interest in looking it up until after someone already got hurt.

Your toung isn't a test kit obviously but the combination of a few easy observations about some key differences in chemical properties may be able to at least help someone in thinking twice before taking it. You can't stop ignorance but you can raise caution. Maybe if someone finds out their molly tastes bitter or sticks together they might be a little more careful with it than if they just assume its real because their homeboy told them so.
 
I've also personally seen what had been ordered as methylone and tested to be methylone on our test kit test as MDMA on a cheaper kit by someone else.

The only way to be sure its real is if you're the chemist who made it. And even then there's plenty that can go wrong considering a lot of illegal chemists lack proper knowledge on what they're doing.
 
I've also personally seen what had been ordered as methylone and tested to be methylone on our test kit test as MDMA on a cheaper kit by someone else.

The only way to be sure its real is if you're the chemist who made it. And even then there's plenty that can go wrong considering a lot of illegal chemists lack proper knowledge on what they're doing.
There are testing centers around the world that CAN tell you EXACTLY what's in your substances. I agree Reagent kits aren't the end all be all. But there are other ways to have your drugs analyses deepening on what part of
The world you live.
 
Not saying that you can detemine a chemical without a test kit. You can't.

But the reality of it is that most people who do "molly" will never even see this thread and are blindly eating chemicals with no knowledge about MDMA or methylone and won't have any interest in looking it up until after someone already got hurt.

Your toung isn't a test kit obviously but the combination of a few easy observations about some key differences in chemical properties may be able to at least help someone in thinking twice before taking it. You can't stop ignorance but you can raise caution. Maybe if someone finds out their molly tastes bitter or sticks together they might be a little more careful with it than if they just assume its real because their homeboy told them so.
See but the thing is that this can cause more harm than good. If someone reads this they could be more inclined to judge a substance by its physical properties, creating a false sense of safety. This would offset any good that comes from proposing to use physical properties as means of identification in case someone doesn't want to use a testkit. You might be experienced and have enough common sense to avoid doing this, but in commenting on a harm reduction forum you have to always take into account the inexperienced, young and/or naive users. It's much harder than you think even to an experienced user to ID a substance by physical properties, or even by the effects it produces. The best MDMA I ever had looked absolutely nothing like any MDMA I've ever seen before or since, on the other hand I've had a fantastic roll a good few years ago on what I thought were pure MDMA pills, judging by the effects. They turned out to be PMA. They tasted and smelled exactly like MDMA too. I didn't have a clue and had been rolling for about 5 years already when that happened. Later on that press was plastered all over the internet as being PMA so I immediately bought my first testkit and tested them and indeed, no MDMA in them
There are testing centers around the world that CAN tell you EXACTLY what's in your substances. I agree Reagent kits aren't the end all be all. But there are other ways to have your drugs analyses deepening on what part of
The world you live.
True, reagent kits are far from foolproof, certainly if you encounter mixtures. Lab testing is the only way to approach 100% certainty, and even then there are mix-ups and unidentifiable substances
 
Last edited:
How about using Marquis in combination with EZ purity test?
 
Top