Billings man admits importing LSD

Illuminati (Rockefeller, DuPont) control the big pharmaceuticals and don't want competition. The CIA needs the illegal drug trade to fund secret wars and insurrections (current example is Iran). Government and law enforcement need the war on drugs to facilitate door busting/SWAT team illegal searches and arrests. Basically the war on drugs is about money and control. They could care less about your health and safety.
 
Cosmic Charlie said:
LSD is LSD , I can assure you that the batches we get around here are as good as the european stuff. Our liquid is always really good and the only things that are weaker sometimes would be blotters. And thats only because they float for so long and degrade.

Our liquid is delicious =D
Click to expand...

to be honest, i`ve got no up-to-date first-hand-experience with real lsd from europe, my last acid was maybe 6-7 years ago. havent taking acid from the usa. what i wrote is just what ive heard from a few people, maybe its total BS, who knows...
 
slimvictor said:
But it is important to note WHY they decide some things should be illegal -
because they are enlightening (or fun).
They want to keep the public dumbed down.
They don't want people getting too many ideas.
They want production high.
They don't want people to question the sanity of working a boring job for their whole lives.
That is why tobacco and alcohol are legal, but not LSD and ecstasy.
Heroin - illegal because it might effect production.
Ritalin - legal (with prescription) because it shuts the kids up so that they can become another cog in the machine.
LSD - illegal, since people might leave their white-collar jobs to become artists and musicians.
Tobacco - legal because people can push themselves to produce more.
Ecstasy - illegal because people might spend their time following their passions.
Caffeine - legal because people will work harder.
etc. etc. etc.
Click to expand...

I actually laughed at that lol. Wait your saying that drugs being illegal is so i want to work and earn money. That its all a conspiracy and its not because drugs can and have been devistating to societies. Think the opium war in china. People fought so drugs could stay around, china sure wasnt better off.

Id feel safer saying they are illegal because people are stupid and dont know their limits, even thats a stretch. Im not saying they should be illegal but i dont think its so we stay cogs in a machine. Also i like the stereotypical drug use out comes almost as bad as the governments propaganda =D

Poor guy though just trying to mail a particular arrangement of atoms.
 
...i can see to a sense what your trying to say bt it has to be refined...

i think if you went down certain rabit holes it may not come out where you think.


...i agree with psychs opening up a realisation that everything may not follow the status quo :)
 
szuko000 said:
I actually laughed at that lol. Wait your saying that drugs being illegal is so i want to work and earn money. That its all a conspiracy and its not because drugs can and have been devistating to societies. Think the opium war in china. People fought so drugs could stay around, china sure wasnt better off.

Id feel safer saying they are illegal because people are stupid and dont know their limits, even thats a stretch. Im not saying they should be illegal but i dont think its so we stay cogs in a machine. Also i like the stereotypical drug use out comes almost as bad as the governments propaganda =D

Poor guy though just trying to mail a particular arrangement of atoms.
Click to expand...

The Opium Wars were fought to keep the Chinese addict population growing to keep making tons of gold for the British, as well as a symbolic gesture of control of the British Empire over China. If anything it supports the notion that the drug war is simply a materialist/imperialist design on the minds and pocketbooks of the laboring masses.

I agree with Huaca. Burroughs mentioned this before the so-called start of the war on drugs with Nixon- Drug War propaganda and legislation is police state building: analogous to the institutional and media anti-Semitism of the Nazis.
 
Madhatter4 said:
^^^10 years minimum for importing "e" and acid eh? While your average rapist/child molestor gets about 4 to 6 years in the clink!!!! Gotta love the good ole "War on Drugs"
Click to expand...



fuck ya Madhatter, I am sick to death over this shit. Real criminals commit seriously savage crimes and spend less time paying for it than someone handling "dangerous" drugs, in a completely non-violent way. This shit needs to change.

My friend was raided by our local drug SWAT team about 4 years ago, their Warrent was for pounds of chronic, which they found of course. He had such a good hook up!! :D Poor guy, felt so bad for him.

But what they didn't expect to find was a brand new vial of 'cid sitting there on the coffe table next to his bongs and pipes! He had JUST picked it up off a friend that day, how unlucky is that??? Those fucking cops got so lucky that day..

Anyways, my friend spent 3.5 years in jail from that shit. I heard it was because you can be charged with attempted manslaughter when you are found in possesion of like more than an ounce of shrooms or a certain amount of LSD doses. Is that true , anyone knows?

And would that apply to this case? Think this guy was charged with something like that? 10 years minimum "mandatory" is agonizingly long! Maybe it was because of the shipping it out of the country thing?
 
szuko000 said:
Wait your saying that drugs being illegal is so i want to work and earn money. That its all a conspiracy and its not because drugs can and have been devistating to societies.
Click to expand...

That's not what I was trying to say at all.
It's not because you want to work - it's because the powers-that-be want you to work.
They need hands to fill in and play the mini-roles so that they can continue to run their machines, make money and maintain their power.
It has nothing to do with you.

It has absolutely nothing to do with drugs being devastating to societies - in fact, I am having a great deal of difficulty thinking of any societies devastated by drugs, other than certain cultures in the past 30 years by crack and meth.
Oh, and maybe alcohol has devastated many societies, if you count that.
Oh yeah, and maybe tranquilizers and barbs. in the McCarthy-era US.
People have used drugs in (virtually?) every human society in recorded history, and you think that the use of drugs that are now considered illegal by one government destroyed / destroys societies, while the use of all the drugs not currently illegal left/ leaves societies intact? 8)

szuko000 said:
Id feel safer saying they are illegal because people are stupid and dont know their limits, even thats a stretch.
Click to expand...

That has nothing to do with it. People are stupid and don't know their limits with alcohol, and that is not illegal (in most countries). Same for most prescription drugs.
People didn't make drugs illegal.
Governments made drugs illegal.
If you think it is for the people's good, you are, in my opinion, a sucker for their propaganda and brainwashing.
 
Tchort said:
The Opium Wars were fought to keep the Chinese addict population growing to keep making tons of gold for the British, as well as a symbolic gesture of control of the British Empire over China. If anything it supports the notion that the drug war is simply a materialist/imperialist design on the minds and pocketbooks of the laboring masses.

I agree with Huaca. Burroughs mentioned this before the so-called start of the war on drugs with Nixon- Drug War propaganda and legislation is police state building: analogous to the institutional and media anti-Semitism of the Nazis.
Click to expand...

Auctually the opium wars were fought for silver, not gold. The chinese began to accept only silver for their tea. Which lead to a trade imbalance. The british needed more silver to buy more tea. So they sold opium. and you know the rest....
 
^^ lol i was just gonna poke fun at that kid for that quote, world or warcraft addicts stick out like a sore thumb sometimes =p





Go go hoffman n stones power... fuckin shitty... guys a retard using their computer though, wtf

Forget who posted it, but I'll join the poster on page one with a *MASSIVE FACE-PALM*
 
sdripper said:
I heard it was because you can be charged with attempted manslaughter when you are found in possesion of like more than an ounce of shrooms or a certain amount of LSD doses. Is that true , anyone knows?

Click to expand...

completely not true at all. But if you play golf with the DA you'll probably do less time for manslaughter than a college kid would for a couple sheets for cid.

But yeah this is complete myth.
 
^ no shit, kid I know brutally murdered the shit out of his grandmother and they got him off with 8 years manslaughter, now stupid internet acid kid is looking at 10
 
slimvictor said:
This is actually essentially what I was saying, Hammilton.
Production - and protecting the status quo - is the name of the game.
If soldiers won't fight, everything the gov. needs falls apart.
If business people won't work, everything falls apart.
If big pharma doesn't make money, everything falls apart.
This is why certain drugs are illegal, and others aren't.
Click to expand...
exactly
 
Thanks for letting me try out my ideas here, everyone.
The more we discuss them, the more I think that they are correct.

Government must protect its own best interests.
This means preserving the status quo, and continuing economic development while keeping money in the hands of those who already have it.
This also means making certain that soldiers will fight, laborers will labor, assembly-line workers will show up and work and work their whole shift, businesspeople will do business, etc.

This is why big pharma owns the US (and other countries as well). It controls lots of money, and uses that power to gain control over more money, etc.
The gov doesnt want to stop this - it is in their own best interest.
In this case, the interests of big pharma align with those of alcohol and tobacco industries, which makes the conclusion foregone.
This is why some drugs are illegal, and others are not.

Note that, while I gave a list earlier (page 1) of certain drugs (those I personally consider "enlightening", as well as those that disturb production in other ways) that are illegal, and those that support production and the status quo that are not illegal, it may not be the case that every single drug can be so easily categorized, or that there are no exceptions.
Sometimes, for historical reasons (such as an outcry over one or two highly publicized deaths due to a certain drug), a drug that could have supported the status quo becomes illegal. Other times, a drug that is enlightening or prevents business as usual is not illegal (yet!).
Sometimes, a drug that could lead to increased production is not recognized by the gov. as such, and is made illegal despite potential benefits to society.
MDMA may be such a drug - it can help people recover from psychological difficulties, but it has a different reputation, and is therefore illegal.

We can't really blame the government for this, since, like a living organism, it's primary job is to survive. It needs to protect its own best interests.

We can, however, rise up and make our voices known. Drugs should not be illegal!!
The freedom to expand our own consciousness any way we want to is a fundamental freedom.

Again, thanks for letting me bounce my ideas around!
 
i wonder what exactly the dog smelt in the package containing only money...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top