Balls, Barbies, and Bongs? Children's Book on Pot

fruitfly

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Oct 28, 2003
Messages
8,071
One night, Jackie woke up past her bedtime. She
smelled something funny in the air, so she walked
down the hall to her parents’ bedroom.

“What’s that, Mommy?" asked Jackie. "Are you and
Daddy smoking a cigarette?"

“No, baby,’ said her mother. ‘This is a 'joint.' It’s
made of marijuana."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

So begins It’s Just a Plant: A Children’s Story of Marijuana, written and illustrated by Ricardo Cortes, CC ’95, who read his book Tuesday night to an audience of about 50 Columbia students. The book relates a simple story of a mother’s effort to explain marijuana to her young daughter. After Jackie stumbles upon her parents using the drug recreationally, her mother introduces her to a farmer, a doctor, and police officers who explain the drug’s history, positive and negative health effects, and criminalization.

“We knew this book was going to be controversial, that’s part of why we thought it would be interesting to invite Ricardo to campus,” said Daniel Blau, CC ’06 and president of Students for a Sensible Drug Policy, the organization that sponsored the event. SSDP is a national student organization, and Columbia’s chapter has about 20 active members. According to Blau, the group is not designed for drug users, but for all people who seek to create a more rational and realistic drug policy.

Cortes highlighted the shortcomings of the current federal government’s drug policies and approach to education. “Mainstream culture thinks that by hiding information from kids, it will make them magically decide not to use drugs,” said Cortes, adding that history has disproved this theory.

This book is an example of what Cortes calls reality-based education, which centers on differentiating between drug use and drug abuse. He contrasted his open, informational approach with Washington’s advertisements for the drug war and public school education through the DARE program, which he characterized as “frightening and intimidating shock tactics, and a message that won’t get through to kids.”

While Cortes is happy that the book has been getting attention in the press, not all of the critics have been kind. He said that a lot of critics have assumed that the book must focus on promoting marijuana use among children, but that it is actually simply about helping parents initiate a dialogue with their children about the drug.

“The parent needs to mediate between the drug and the child,” said Cortes, who said during the question-and-answer period that the book is designed for parents and children to read together and may not be suitable for a young reader to pick up on his or her own.

Cortes said that, though he has received positive feedback from the parents and children who he knows have read the book, it has been difficult to distribute. It was rejected by dozens of publishers before Cortes decided to self-publish, and many bookstores, along with the Brooklyn Library, have refused to stock it. The book can currently be purchased through a Web site established by Cortes and at Barnes and Noble’s online store.

Some members of the medical community share Cortes’s views on the need for a revitalized approach to drug education. One supporter is Dr. Carl Hart, an associate professor of psychology and psychiatry at Columbia who researches the pharmacological effects of marijuana on humans.

Dr. Hart, who has read the book, said that he was not disturbed. “For children to gain knowledge is a good thing, as long as you educate them in a responsible manner. You want people to have more information available to them, not less,” he said.

Hart said that drugs like marijuana have been overly politicized, which undermines recognition of their positive effects. “One of the negative consequences of the way drug education has been done since the ’80s has been to greatly exaggerate the negative effects of drugs,” Hart said. “Now we’re in a society where people reject anything that drug experts and physicians say about their potential benefits.”

The audience as a whole received the book sympathetically, responding positively to its message and style. “This book is a needle bursting the bubble of the hypocrisy of denial,” said Isaac Skelton, a 33-year-old SIPA student and father of two. “It challenged me as a parent and a smoker to explain my choices to my kids when they’re ready.”

“The more access people have to marijuana as a topic for discussion and a viable choice for adults, the less likely it is to be abused,” said Eli Dvorkin, CC ’08.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balls, Barbies, and Bongs? Children's Book on Pot

By Taylor Walsh, Columbia Spectator
February 23, 2005


Link
 
“Mainstream culture thinks that by hiding information from kids, it will make them magically decide not to use drugs,” said Cortes, adding that history has disproved this theory.

so true. the book sounds great, I want to pick one up!
 
if anyone from here purchases or reads the entire book, i'd like to see a review =)
 
i agree with the above poster.

this book is a really great idea i think...

but it is so stoned in its presentation that it undercuts its own objectives.

a mom and a daughter dressing up like a samurai and a bandleader to ride bikes to go talk to people about pot...

i think there is a less...complete high way to present a book like this
 
I think it went a bit overboard with the smiles, rainbows, and corny extreme free-spiritedness but we must remember this book isn't made to convince people it's ok to smoke pot, but rather to help parents talk to their kids about marijuana.
 
I think it is a pretty cool idea. I wonder if anyone will make one on mushrooms (It's Just a Fungus?) or any other drug.
 
I found that site linked off of some other marijuana site a few months ago, and could not determine if this book was for real. "The next day Jackie and her mother put on their favorite costumes. Jackie was a samurai and her mom was a bandleader" wtf?? that's a bit cracked if you ask me. But the more positive pot messages out there, the better!!

lol at "It's just a fungus"!!
 
i think it's about time someone has tried to crack the drug education crap we have out there today. in DARE, it made drugs look bad and we all know that kids like to do things they're not suppose to. it actually made me want to do drugs.
i think it's rediculous how our culture thinks children don't know any better. kids are getting smarter everyday, so we don't need to just say, "drugs are bad, don't do drugs."
i have a 6 month old and i had no idea how i would ever explain my personal beliefs to her because the media and it's views on drugs would confuse her and make her believe i was a bad person for smoking pot every now and then.
i think we need to start giving kids choices about what they want to do in a responsible way rather than just telling them what to do and exaggerating the effects.

"if you smoke pot, you'll become a loser at mcdonalds. but if you don't you'll be super cool!"
 
All DARE does is confuse kids. The DARE teacher I had in middle school was far better than most, but the program is still really ridiculous. I was flat out SCARED of drugs until high school. I was SUPER straightedge for a long time for no other reason than that I thought drugs were dangerous. I mean, drugs *are* dangerous, but I thought that *all* of them were like, fatal at low doses or something. And then I took my first hit... :)

My experience was that all DARE did was make kids think one of two ways: like me, being absurdly afraid of any chemical called "drug", or like the "cool" kids who thought drugs were edgy and cool and very "chic mystique." It's completely stupid to think that kids aren't getting plenty of information (and MISinformation) from their friends, the media, and school. Flat out telling kids that "drugs are bad and wrong" is only going to needlessly scare them, or provoke them to do drugs even further. Kids today are exposed to record levels of "immoral" behavior at younger and younger ages, and it is our responsibility to make sure they get proper, *correct* information and have a venue to have all their questions answered.

When I have children, I will make very clear to them from the moment they are mature enough to understand that I do NOT encourage or condone drug use before high school (or even for a while after depending on maturity levels) and I still will not tolerate even the most minor abuse or irresponsible behavior. Certainly before high school there will be some strict penalties in my household for using any substances at all. I think this book is an excellent teaching tool, and it's a great example of the slow evolution of the general population's view on drug use in America. Maybe by the time our children have grown up thing will be different... I can hope anyways...
 
Fuck that... I've been a pot smoker for years, there would be no way I would ever encourage people to do it. Its not just a plant, it damages young people- I know, I'm going thru the stupid hell of quitting. Non-addictive: what a load of shit. Its a fucking drug that people think is okay to abuse but it wrecks lives. I'm gonna tell my kids to stay away from it- who needs the added confusion pot inevitably brings when being a human is confusing anyway. Anyone who says weed is okay is justifying the fact that they can't quit or denying that its addictive. Drugs can be fun- I use LSD, 2C-I, mushrooms, mescaline and other psychedelics because they are life afirming and enhancing- marijunana I believe deadens you. A bad nasty drug and I don't say that lightly. I can't wait to see the incoherent and irrational responses this will get.... feel free to go nuts on me about this, I can explain succintly all the preceeding nonsense I have just spouted. How boring is dope . . . how boring to consume the same product everyday and become a "pot-head" clone of all these other free and easy souls- free: why do they need weed. Easy- whats easy about being confused. I support recreational use of proper pyschedelics, but I certainly do not support drug addiction. Human brains are not designed to cope with the immense dislocation that marijunan brings. Hmmm, maybe it only does that to me and I've turned into some ranting madmen with no rhyme or reason to his thoughts. Anyway Psy-Trance is better then any drug... except LIFE! And water! And oxygen! I luv that shit . . .
 
Though I liked the idea of "Its only a fungus". How about "Its only a incredibly synthesised extract of the Ergot Fungus" or " Cactus' are Spikey, But Only Need Hugs". Sorry, lame attempt at humour . . . I just re-read what I wrote above, it doesn't make a heap of sense I admit . . . but do drugs and the use thereof? On that note, adios.
 
you dont like pot. so you rant about it. worry about YOUR problems and stop preaching to us.

i think you are addicted to listening to yourself over think shit. lighten-up francis.
 
Top