-
CD Moderators: someguyontheinternet
Any news about jwh-018 and other synthetic cannabinoids?
- Thread starter illerrre
- Start date
Nib
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2002
- Messages
- 898
http://www.synchronium.net/2009/02/21/jwh-018-toxicology/
So I would go with no, its not that bad. There's more resources you can look up that seem to say the same thing as that one.
So I would go with no, its not that bad. There's more resources you can look up that seem to say the same thing as that one.
HighonLife
Bluelighter
^^^^ the report states at the begining he doesnt know who the sponsor or the provider of these studies was nor does he give the name for the professor who backed it up.
i know NOTHING of JWH-018, i like regular weed, but i do know how to look at studies and reports and if they cant tell you were it came from then you definatly dont go believing it blindly
im not saying these studies are wrong but until you know where they came from and who conducted them they have the potential for being no more than what someone could have made up and typed it on Word or something
also i decided not to pay to look at the links if anyone does so and feels diff about this lemme know but even if the data seems really legit, one has to wonder why know one wanted to put thier name to it, and with out credibility its psuedo-science
i know NOTHING of JWH-018, i like regular weed, but i do know how to look at studies and reports and if they cant tell you were it came from then you definatly dont go believing it blindly
im not saying these studies are wrong but until you know where they came from and who conducted them they have the potential for being no more than what someone could have made up and typed it on Word or something
also i decided not to pay to look at the links if anyone does so and feels diff about this lemme know but even if the data seems really legit, one has to wonder why know one wanted to put thier name to it, and with out credibility its psuedo-science
Swerlz
Bluelight Crew
Not enough actual research as been done on the "cancer" issue with the JWH series. I'm sure it'll be banned before any real tests can be conducted
Bob Loblaw
Bluelight Crew
You, sir, are a failure. As this is a basic question, I'll let it rest here for a day or two and then send it over.
Coolio
Greenlighter
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2004
- Messages
- 6,946
illerrre, because it's an uncontrolled recreational drug, and not a pharmaceutical or a controlled substance, nobody is really interested in funding research on JWH-018. You're going to be waiting a LONG time to hear any 'news' about what you are curious about.
HighonLife
Bluelighter
^agreed
Bob Loblaw
Bluelight Crew
Going, going, gone
imahustler420
Bluelighter
I've read that study along with others and do have first hand experience of using spice-a-like products daily for over 3 months now.
I made the switch directly from cannabis and I am very happy with the aroma spice gives off.
As far as negative effects go I haven't noticed any yet besides noticing more fluid buildup in the lungs than usual (if you're a tobacco smoker you'll know what I mean). Other than that I have no complaints, and feel it is a relatively safe RC.
However I do not know the long-term effects and neither does anyone else so basically it's russian roulette but I really feel it's safer than that honestly.
I made the switch directly from cannabis and I am very happy with the aroma spice gives off.
As far as negative effects go I haven't noticed any yet besides noticing more fluid buildup in the lungs than usual (if you're a tobacco smoker you'll know what I mean). Other than that I have no complaints, and feel it is a relatively safe RC.
However I do not know the long-term effects and neither does anyone else so basically it's russian roulette but I really feel it's safer than that honestly.