Exactly, you think it's irrelivent because you don't give a shit, you don't accept that I have a right to an opinion you deem off limits. So why would you think I'd feel any different about it? I'm just as much a target of YOU
You're right jess - i don't give a shit about the rights of terrorists.
I'm kind of bored of people making academic arguments about things that are a genuine threat in the real world.
Silence you? Come on - now you're just being melodramatic.
Antifascism targets nazis. Nobody else.
If you're getting mistaken for a nazi, antifa are the least of your problems.
This isn't about fighting nazis. If it were you'd be offering compassion and empathy to people at risk of falling to extremism. What we have here is one group of extremists fighting another group of extremists over ideological differences. This is about eliminating the competition.
Ugh.
Antifascists
do encourage people to stop being nazis.
And the whole fucking point is about compassion -
compassion for people in the community who are targeted by fucking nazis. Whether they are muslim, black, gay, jewish, communists or anyone else nazis plot to murder.
I get the impression you have no intention of understanding why people stand up to nazis in the only way you can. You just want to make academic arguments.
If you took the threat of the extreme right seriously, you might be less defensive, but it's kind of tiresome having to answer to ridiculous claims about "who will they attack next?" It's a joke.
When we're done fighting nazis we go back to the campaigns we've been distracted by when the nazis popped up - all the other campaigns we were fighting (various environmental and human rights concerns).
There are no examples of antifa attacking "everyone they disagree with" because that's simply bullshit.
The slippery slope fallacy is especially ridiculous in this context.