• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: Tronica

Another Gateway Theory! News - Dope leads to drink, hard drugs

TripppAR

Bluelighter
Joined
Feb 11, 2010
Messages
835
Location
Sharing A Bed With Sienna Miller In A Lounge Made
Dope leads to drink, hard drugs
JILL STARK
April 4, 2010

PARENTS have been warned to take a tough line on teenagers who smoke cannabis, with research showing even occasional use can lead to alcoholism and harder drugs.

About 2000 Australian schoolchildren were tracked over a decade in a study that found those who had used cannabis occasionally at age 13 and 14 were more likely to be taking ecstasy, cocaine or amphetamines at 24. They were also more at risk of addiction to cannabis, with one in 10 occasional teen users hooked as adults.

Almost one-third of occasional cannabis users were taking harder drugs in their early 20s compared with 11 per cent of those who had not earlier used the substance.

The study, in last week's British Journal of Psychiatry, linked higher levels of alcoholism to cannabis use. It said 15 per cent of occasional cannabis smokers were addicted to alcohol in early adulthood, compared with only 9 per cent of those who had not smoked dope.

While overall those who smoked cannabis regularly – weekly or more – had the highest levels of substance abuse in adulthood, the finding that those who had dabbled only occasionally – less than weekly –were also at risk, is significant.

The study contradicts previous research that suggested regularly smoking the drug could lead to adult substance abuse but was less harmful if used infrequently.

Lead author Louisa Degenhardt, from the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre at the University of NSW, said the study highlighted the need for early intervention to stop children taking up the habit.

"What it definitely says is that early onset occasional cannabis use is a marker for being more likely to be engaging in a whole range of drug use behaviours in young adulthood."

Australian Childhood Foundation chief executive Joe Tucci urged parents not to allow their children to experiment with cannabis. "Patterns of behaviour start early in children, so these habits can be very hard to break. Cannabis can cause lots of detrimental impacts all the way through to psychosis as you get older, so the perception of cannabis as a softer, harmless drug is not right."


http://www.smh.com.au/national/dope-leads-to-drink-hard-drugs-20100403-rkub.html
 
Yeah it's the same garbage - they never look at why someone might want to smoke pot - because they want to get high! And they will try getting high with various substances as they become available to them - first alcohol then pot then etc etc etc. The gateway hypothesis has been and will always be complete garbage.
 
I call B.s!

Exact words I was gonna use.
Their survey may have found some interesting results.
But saying Weed is a gateway drug is retarded. Because then what lead them to try weed in the 1st place? People are their own gateways. Curiosity strikes first
 
Exactly!

I tried pot once, didn't really like the effect it gave me and went on to "harder" drugs because I preferred the effects they caused.

Even if I hadn't tried pot, I still would've tried the others!
 
Howdy all.

Did you notice that two Fairfax newspapers, The Age and the Sydney Morning Herald reported:
Cannabis 'Leads To Drink, Hard Drugs'

The SMH wrote that the head author of the report said "leads" but in fact she didn't say that at all. She said "it was a marker". At least The Age wrote this:
Professor Degenhardt called for caution in interpreting the study's results, saying it was unclear if cannabis was a ''gateway'' drug.

The whole point is that it didn't prove that early use of cannabis caused the group to do all those nasty things when they got older BUT those who did those things when older ALSO smoked dope when they were younger. The report also found that those who smoked ciggies were prone to risky behaviour when older as well. As Crankinit pointed out, a classic example of the media swapping correlation with causation.

Read my article here:

Fairfax Misleads Public About Cannabis Study

Regards

Terry Wright
The Australian Heroin Diaries
 
Thanks for that Terry, nice article

I'm sick and tired of this misleading reporting

It's getting beyond a joke

Is it the people writing the articles or are they being forced into skewing the facts to keep their jobs?

Fairfax are getting as bad as the Murdock empire
 
Exactly!

I tried pot once, didn't really like the effect it gave me and went on to "harder" drugs because I preferred the effects they caused.

Even if I hadn't tried pot, I still would've tried the others!
Yeah me too - if anything, pot put me off drugs coz it makes me feel like shit and freaks me out, the mental effects of pot for me are far worse than the hardest drug you can think of. In relation to the findings, like others said, correlation does not equal causation, most likely those who have access to pot have access to other drugs too, although maybe because pot is so common it leads them to curiosity about mind-altering substances in the first place and relaxation of the stigma that pot brings and hence they are more objective and open-minded towards harder drugs? I just remember that first bucket being scary as hell and after that it's like "meh, what else is out there?"
 
Thanks for that Terry, nice article

I'm sick and tired of this misleading reporting

It's getting beyond a joke

Is it the people writing the articles or are they being forced into skewing the facts to keep their jobs?

Fairfax are getting as bad as the Murdock empire

Good to see you made it back alive Psilo :P

The push for misinformation comes from the top as far as I know. There is a lot of politics in the media, and of course you can't forget hyped up medis makes money (which is what the media bosses are all about).

Quite a few juorno's have mentioned that drug (and non-drug) articles have to be be in line with the views of the media company and their bosses. The journo's rarely have much say as to the context of most articles in profit-driven media outlets.
 
Top