Animal testing protests: 'Test [legal highs] on the idiots who take them'

It's only IF testing on humans is not an option that animal testing may be necessary, BUT the synthetic legal highs being tested have already been tested on humans to find out which were psychoactive, without serious adverse effects being apparent.

WE were, and continue to be the human "guinea pigs".

And how about the cosmetic industry already testing their new products on animals, without them being pre-screened on humans first? Nobody seems to have even mentioned it.
 
Thank you slim. Agree with Tenchi - where's the like button.

drug_mentor made some great points, in no way was he "trolling".

This is a very difficult issue, ethically, but surely testing things such as LD50 on aminals is the lesser of 2 evils that will have a positive outcome. Done in the most humane way possible, which, I suppose would still be pretty horrendous.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top