One of these seems to pop up every few months.. Phenethylamine bigots do exist. I'll say what I've said in every one of these; have you tried 2c-b? Lol. 2c-b is not stimulating.. Sedate at times, though certainly empathogenic and ecstatic. 2c-b is the premier empathogen/psychedelic, to me. At lower, non-visionary doses it can be a pure empathogen. At higher doses it becomes starkly visionary and remains clear headed and the empathy remains.
Sure, you might not find them useful for recreational tripping, spiritual experience or what have you, but imagine that this world exists with thousands if not millions who could all benefit from different experiences. This is the world you live in where hundreds of millions of different psychologies co-exist, where each and every one can react to any given experience in vastly differing ways (drug experience or otherwise). The phenethylamines, classic or new, have their place. For me, 2c-b was spiritual, it was a healing compound and a learning compound. It added to my experience as a human being and I feel lucky to have been gifted such an opportunity, though that is only one mans experience! I can't say with certainty what anyone else might obtain from such an experience, and neither can you.
Now 2c-b is just one example.. Take heroin, for instance. I've tried it twice, liked it. Don't feel the need to go back to it, even for one more taste. This wouldn't seem to reflect the majority of heroin experiences, would it? All I'm trying to say is that your experience is just that, the experience of one individual human being. Your experience doesn't speak for the gambit of phenethylamine experiences and neither does it change their place as useful psychedelics, it certainly doesn't reflect the majority, either. So don't be so quick to cast your judgement on the chemicals themselves!
