There are also reports such as with Flight 93 of it landing in Ohio at an evacuated airport. I cannot find any solid evidence of anything. Lots of this shit could easily be faked, such as those phone calls. Nothing too solid there to indicate anything. Considering all the hundreds of other holes in the official theory, I'm leaning towards calling bullshit on this too.
I'd like to see these reports of the plane landing in ohio.
could have been faked!
could have been faked. There is more evidence to say they were not faked. Faked how? Voice morphing?
Dude, it's not fucking rocket science, and even rocket science isn't that fucking hard to understand.
No it's not rocket science. Its structural engineering and physics. Like i said. Thousands of qualified people have studied it and come to the same conclusion, bar a select few.
Yes, they were buildings made of AIR. Forget those massive steel columns. Plastic tipped hollow airplanes eat steel fucking columns for breakfast! Yet, they get atomized at two very special crash sites on 9/11 - the pentagon and shanksville.
There's a good chance that the nose missed the steel columns.. and even if it didn't.. apply enough force from something weak and it can break something stronger than itself.
You are nothing but a mess of contradictions and hypocrisy rickola. You scorn me for "anecdotal" evidence when you yourself pile even shittier "anecdotal" evidence on me and your supposed millions of "eyewitnesses" who "don't feel a need to prove themselves.
Fighting fire with fire. Like i said I've spoken to people that saw the plane hit the world trade centre.. and no they are not spies, reporters, military or anything to do with the government.. they were civilians. There are also a lot of reports of people that saw the planes hidden within documentaries.. but of course the montages created by conspiracy theorists aren't going to include them. And no I'm not going to find them for you.
I'll concede that nothing is very clear with the Pentagon, but considering this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hani_Hanjour
So there is evidence he had training to be a pilot, he was becoming increasingly involved in islamic extremism and had flown around the country to study security? He had difficulty landing a cessna.. He still managed it.. And forgive me if I'm wrong but he didn't exactly land Flight 77 too well either..
Like i said, though. I never believed the official story. It wouldn't surprise me if he was never on flight 77 but there is more evidence to say he was that to say he wasn't. The maneuver he pulled wasn't even that great.. he had a long time to line it up. Like i said before I've seen complete amateurs with no flying experience or knowledge take control of a small plane with ease.. The pilot then tells them it'd actually be easier to do in a bigger plane.
That's pretty fucking bad. I'm pretty amazed how he suddenly became super pilot of Islamic Vengeance and did a perfect maneuver right into the pentagon when he couldn't even get hired as a flight attendant due to shitty grades in school. He suddenly had a stroke of genius. He just hopped right into that 757 cockpit amid a high tension situation like having recently hijacked it and had a sudden transformation from a total fuck-up to a master pilot. Yeah, whatever...and I'm the Queen of Fucking England.
Master pilot? Like i just said.. he had quite a lot of training at flight school.. and that's the training we know about.. All he had to do was turn the plane and line it up.. No landing required. People with little to no experience have done more impressive things on planes.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3019035...er-lands-plane-after-pilot-dies/#.UKYmYY0aO4o
http://travel.aol.co.uk/2011/05/27/passenger-lands-plane-after-pilot-becomes-ill/
This and ten thousand other holes and "odd" occurences, contradictions, etc. combined with any clear evidence to support anything at all the official story says, I'm gonna play it safe and call TOTAL BULLSHIT on it!
Again.. I never believed the official story.. You are right.. there are holes.. but there are just as many if not MORE in most of the conspiracy theories.. The no plane theory being one of the biggest.
You watch live video compositing everytime you turn on the news. Brian Williams sits in front of a green screen and has a visual display composited in behind him. CNN Headline News composits tickers across the screen in real time. Not that fucking amazing. Editing in audio in real time is even easier. There's nothing solid except for the amount of bullshit in your arguments, rickola and everyone else who doubts what really happened.
Yes.. and he is aware that he is sitting in front of a green screen.. while sitting in a news room.. with nobody else around but the crew.. hardly the same thing as faking 2 plane crashes in the middle of one of the busiest cities in the world.
I admit the Key brought up a few dodgy things.. like the edited audio on the video where the mans (rather unemotional) voice is added where he says "oh my god a plane just hit the building" or something.. but most of it is complete crap by someone who seemingly knows nothing about physics and is promoting the
could have bullshit.
So about the
could have been faked, not enough evidence. What would you consider to be enough evidence to validate a claim?
And excuse me.. but i think you missed a lot of my points.
