If they are in fact "interchangeable" Then perhaps...maybe these labels that we put on sexuality are....non sense. Maybe, just maybe were all a little gay. That would mean heterosexuality does not exist....Dun dun duuunnnnn
perhaps we're all a lil bit teh ghey... wtf does that have to do w/ your original point? And y does that mean heterosex. doesn't exist?
"Sun sun suuuuuunnnnnn"
yeah, dude i'll bet you're a closeted-gay, who's too immature/young to have any realistic conceptions of 'sexual identity' (or, and not trying to be an a-hole, but 'no concept of self identity'), which is why you're trying to hash-out your own ambiguitie in a multi-person board setup... it's the least offensive and least -assumptive-based assumption i can garner right nao. Lemme know, specifically, what is missing and i'll gladly address it. I'd love/woulda loved to address the homo/hetero topic moar, as i've got a lot of non-mainstream-stuff to say, having been on both sides myself as a straight male, but your posts belie a hetero person who's still confused, and not even remotely ready, to acknowledge anything but heterosex. This'd almost be amusing, but w/o any constrasting opinion(read: poster) containing a worthwhile argument, it defaults to boring
[edit: I'm kinda interested in your reply, regardless of how stupid i expect it to be... that doesn't mean i'm not interested tho, and in the end, if you just keep it as close to factual as possible, i'm ok to reply. Plz do reply to this post, am very curious what you're thinking ;P )
perhaps we're all a lil bit teh ghey... wtf does that have to do w/ your original point? And y does that mean heterosex. doesn't exist?
"Sun sun suuuuuunnnnnn"
yeah, dude i'll bet you're a closeted-gay, who's too immature/young to have any realistic conceptions of 'sexual identity' (or, and not trying to be an a-hole, but 'no concept of self identity'), which is why you're trying to hash-out your own ambiguitie in a multi-person board setup... it's the least offensive and least -assumptive-based assumption i can garner right nao. Lemme know, specifically, what is missing and i'll gladly address it. I'd love/woulda loved to address the homo/hetero topic moar, as i've got a lot of non-mainstream-stuff to say, having been on both sides myself as a straight male, but your posts belie a hetero person who's still confused, and not even remotely ready, to acknowledge anything but heterosex. This'd almost be amusing, but w/o any constrasting opinion(read: poster) containing a worthwhile argument, it defaults to boring
[edit: I'm kinda interested in your reply, regardless of how stupid i expect it to be... that doesn't mean i'm not interested tho, and in the end, if you just keep it as close to factual as possible, i'm ok to reply. Plz do reply to this post, am very curious what you're thinking ;P )
By the way my initial point was that I do not believe in defining sexuality...theses words we use such as straight/gay...they're just gimmicks.
Sexual preference is....or shall I say....CAN BE A CHOICE.
If it's a choice that means...we all have gay potential....our sexuality is not set in stone....hurrrayyyy....no more labels!
Sorry if this news upsets you.
By the way...BMX rider....you're a talented mental gymnast.... I just re-read your last post to me....I want this on record... I'm neither hetero nor homo...I DO NOT BELEIVE IN LABELING/DEFINING SEXUALITY....Hence my initial point.
You love to manipulate and contort facts a lot don't you....You have that lawyer mentality.
You're a manipulator... You've been putting words in my mouth through out this entire debate. Even throwing in complete bold faced lies.
You hide behind extravagant speech... laced with double meaning.
male
meɪl/Submit
adjective
1.
of or denoting the sex that produces gametes, especially spermatozoa, with which a female may be fertilized or inseminated to produce offspring.
"male children"
synonyms: masculine, to do with men, he-; More
antonyms: female
relating to or characteristic of men or male animals.
"a deep male voice"
(of a plant or flower) bearing stamens but lacking functional pistils.
(of a fitting or part of machinery) manufactured to fit inside a corresponding female part.
"the valve has standard half-inch threaded male ends"
noun
noun: male; plural noun: males
1.
a male person, plant, or animal.
Cba to post the female side of things but basically.. being a man (or male) is decided by your chromosomes.. not your psychology. Many things thought of as manly or girly or whatever is nothing more than a cultural construct which can and does easily change with time.. I'd be willing to bet that most of these *man born a woman* cases wouldn't happen is society didn't have these strict unwritten rules of what a man is and isn't.
In 19th century England, pink ribbons or decorations were often worn by young boys; boys were simply considered small men, and while men in England wore red uniforms, boys wore pink.
Cba to post the female side of things but basically.. being a man (or male) is decided by your chromosomes.. not your psychology. Many things thought of as manly or girly or whatever is nothing more than a cultural construct which can and does easily change with time..
Hey rick...hypothetically 50 years into the future...Let's say we have the technology to completely transform a man into a woman and vise versa....What then would gender be?
^in 50y/intoFuture, I'd do anything w/in reason to have your ID/psyche be hacked, just so i could fuck you in the most disturbing ways possible to your psyche, then setup an alarm to harrass you at least 1x/wk (minimum. Would probably get others on board, just to destroy anything resembling the weak, cob-webbed 'psyche' that creates such nonsense as you chose a 'god is love' handle to proclaim.
//yes, this is my response to your post. The post was too, ahem, dumb to reply to as such, so plz accept this as a reply yeah?
edit: WOW, you're coming up on a year on bluelight!? all i can imagine is... you setup acct and forgot about it... cuz no way in hell you actually were around, and reading, the way this board goes in the meanwhile...
^in 50y/intoFuture, I'd do anything w/in reason to have your ID/psyche be hacked, just so i could fuck you in the most disturbing ways possible to your psyche, then setup an alarm to harrass you at least 1x/wk (minimum. Would probably get others on board, just to destroy anything resembling the weak, cob-webbed 'psyche' that creates such nonsense as you chose a 'god is love' handle to proclaim.
//yes, this is my response to your post. The post was too, ahem, dumb to reply to as such, so plz accept this as a reply yeah?
rickisnice: how the hell are you throwing her bait like that?!? meh, i'm about/beyond done trying, and will probably enjoy getting back-in upon responding to something they say to you so meh...
GodIsLove: I'm still confused, can you plz show me teh way? Plz elaborate, i beg you, b4 writing me off as lost; much will come of doing as much, tho not in this life- in the Next. Be strong, stand your stance and stay your course- I r tru heathen, i - no joke - I really don't know the differences in these things, and I yearn to learn. Are you capable of dispelling confusion, of elucidating the True Principles of the universe, at least w/ regards to sexuality?
I truly do hope so, because your prior posts gave an impression your stance wasn't remotely... 'mainstream' Typically, ppl who espouse such sentiment are, well, dumb/ignorant; but, you?, you seem pretty learn'd, am really hoping you can elucidate a bit on what you meant, whether it's about the homoVhetero dichotomy, the fact that neither are real, or any other such nonsense, it's really no matter to me, i'm ready to learn dude. Much appreciation in advance for you to elaborate whatcha meant
- having regard to the hearing on HAARP and Non-lethal Weapons held by the Foreign Affairs Subcommitee on Security and Disarmament in Brussels on 5 February 1998,
..
T. whereas, despite the existing conventions, military research is ongoing on environmental manipulation as a weapon, as demonstrated for example by the Alaska-based HAARP system,
..
Legal aspects of military activities
26. Calls on the European Union to seek to have the new 'non-lethal' weapons technology and the development of new arms strategies also covered and regulated by international conventions;
27. Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by virtue of its farreaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the high Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) programme currently being funded in Alaska;
28. Requests the Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) Panel to agree to examine the scientific and technical evidence provided in all existing research findings on HAARP to assess the exact nature and degree of risk that HAARP poses both to the local and global environment and to public health generally;
29. Calls on the Commission, in collaboration with the governments of Sweden, Finland, Norway and the Russian Federation, to examine the environmental and public health implications of the HAARP programme for Arctic Europe and to report back to Parliament with its findings;
..
Big bit:
NSFW:
HAARP - a weapons system which disrupts the climate
On 5 February 1998 Parliament's Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament held a hearing the subject of which included HAARP. NATO and the US had been invited to send representatives, but chose not to do so. The Committee regrets the failure of the USA to send a representative to answer questions, or to use the opportunity to comment on the material submitted.(21)
HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) is run jointly by the US Air Force and Navy, in conjunction with the Geophysical Institute of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Similar experiments are also being conducted in Norway, probably in the Antarctic, as well as in the former Soviet Union.(22) HAARP is a research project using a ground based apparatus, an array of antennae each powered by its own transmitter, to heat up portions of ionosphere with powerful radio beams.(23) The energy generated heats up parts of the ionosphere; this results in holes in the ionosphere and produces artificial 'lenses'.
HAARP can be used for many purposes. Enormous quantities of energy can be controlled by manipulating the electrical characteristics of the atmosphere. If used as a military weapon this can have a devastating impact on an enemy. HAARP can deliver millions of times more energy to a given area than any other conventional transmitter. The energy can also be aimed at a moving target which should constitute a potential anti-missile system.
The project would also allow better communications with submarines and manipulation of global weather patterns, but it is also possible to do the reverse, to disrupt communications. By manipulating the ionosphere one could block global communications while transmitting one's own. Another application is earth-penetrating, tomography, x-raying the earth several kilometres deep, to detect oil and gas fields, or underground military facilities. Over-the-horizon radar is another application, looking round the curvature of the earth for in-coming objects.
From the 1950s the USA conducted explosions of nuclear material in the Van Allen Belts(24) to investigate the effect of the electro-magnetic pulse generated by nuclear weapon explosions at these heights on radio communications and the operation of radar. This created new magnetic radiation belts which covered nearly the whole earth. The electrons travelled along magnetic lines of force and created an artificial Aurora Borealis above the North Pole. These military tests are liable to disrupt the Van Allen belt for a long period. The earth's magnetic field could be disrupted over large areas, which would obstruct radio communications. According to US scientists it could take hundreds of years for the Van Allen belt to return to normal. HAARP could result in changes in weather patterns. It could also influence whole ecosystems, especially in the sensitive Antarctic regions.
Another damaging consequence of HAARP is the occurrence of holes in the ionosphere caused by the powerful radio beams. The ionosphere protects us from incoming cosmic radiation. The hope is that the holes will fill again, but our experience of change in the ozone layer points in the other direction. This means substantial holes in the ionosphere that protects us.
With its far-reaching impact on the environment HAARP is a matter of global concern and we have to ask whether its advantages really outweigh the risks. The environmental impact and the ethical aspect must be closely examined before any further research and testing takes place. HAARP is a project of which the public is almost completely unaware, and this needs to be remedied.
HAARP has links with 50 years of intensive space research for military purposes, including the Star Wars project, to control the upper atmosphere and communications. This kind of research has to be regarded as a serious threat to the environment, with an incalculable impact on human life. Even now nobody knows what impact HAARP may have. We have to beat down the wall of secrecy around military research, and set up the right to openness and democratic scrutiny of military research projects, and parliamentary control.
A series of international treaties and conventions (the Convention on the prohibition of military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques, the Antarctic Treaty, the Treaty on principles governing the activities of states in the exploration and use of outer space including the moon and other celestial bodies, and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea) casts considerable doubt on HAARP on legal as well as humanitarian and political grounds. The Antarctic Treaty lays down that the Antarctic may be used exclusively for peaceful purposes.(25) This would mean that HAARP is a breach of international law. All the implications of the new weapons systems should be examined by independent international bodies. Further international agreements should be sought to protect the environment from unnecessary destruction in war.
I don't believe in focusing on lowest-common-demoniator consciousness-stuff, so I prefer to keep my focus elsewhere, but sometimes knowledge of the evils of this world and beyond can also be useful.
I found this to be one of the few sources I've seen that makes sense and sounds like it knows what it's talking about.
I believe much of this is now out-dated and no longer valid or a threat though (for many reasons).
Seems like someone else in the grip of dark powers was helped through deliverance by the power of Christ.
I think the main thing about this kind of thing is that it makes you realise what a powerful occult weapon Christ is. Not evil occult, but a weapon against the occult, through the power of Christ and the Sword of the Holy Spirit. As every demon in hell is bound to bow their head to Christ, and can't even stand hearing his name, they have to flee.
The problem is that many are so filled with demons or evil spirits, or just propaganda, they also resent hearing his name and are very opposed to Christianity, so it keeps them trapped and they don't get help.
