junctionalfunkie
Bluelighter
^ The same way they've legalized medical, yet not recreational, morphine, cocaine, etc.
Yes, it is crazy.
Yes, it is crazy.
recons said:The governments unwillingness to change or even think of progressive change when it comes to drug laws, as well as the decrease of personal liberties in the name of terrorism and national security, and the eagerness to associate drugs and terrorism together in the media, leads me to say, many indicators point to no change, or an era of bringing forth more conservative draconian drug policy.
jamaica0535 said:very few car crashes caused by it every year, and a very low addiction potential... more lives are ruined by the laws around weed than weed itself...
.
Putingrad said:Nice article. There's definitely some progress being made, I believe most of us will see the effective decriminilization of the drug in our lifetime.
whipitgood3030 said:Clinton was a pot smoking Fleetwood Mac re-uniter, and he kept up the most draconian drug laws and busted medical patients. Its not gonna take one president to change drug policy, as Bushs cohorts feared backdoor marijuana users can get medical marijuana, althogh i firmly believe that a few cheaters shouldnt stop medicine from getting to patients. IF you wanna use wikipedia for your source (heh) here you go :
Tryptamine*Dreamer said:I don't expect things to get much better for at least 20 years. It may not happen in our lifetimes. It may appear that things are moving slowly in the direction of decriminalization, but how long until the pendulum swings in the other direction? How long until the public is whipped into a frenzy over the next demon drug, just like with crack in the 80's or the hysteria over weed in the 30's? Then it starts all over again. More restrictive laws and harsher punishment.
Don't expect much positive change, or you'll be disappointed.
There are a couple of problems with that idea.
First, nearly half of the population has an IQ<100. You would be discriminating against a large percentage of the population, most of whom would be capable of having a reasonable understanding of the potential dangers of drug use.
Secondly, this would not get rid of the black market. Plenty of folks would sell to the less intelligent for a profit. Anyone with a low IQ could easily get someone else to buy the drug anyway. It would not work.
I really don't like the idea of the government testing and keeping records of its citizens' IQs anyway.
It would be reasonable to refuse to sell to anyone who doesn't have the mental capacity to understand the risks involved, such as children, the mentally retarded, or anyone in a psychotic state. If a legal drug or dangerous item was knowingly sold to someone like that and someone gets hurt or killed, it might already be considered criminally negligent. I'm not sure of the law with regard to that.
btrswiet7u4ia said:Teenagers use too...
So..
It's going to have to be legal for teenagers to make the black market smaller.
Teens are going to smoke weed regardless -_-
The Young Geezer said:actually U.S.A. has a lot more important things to do on internal and foreign policy and it´s economy than discusing about drug laws, and truth is marijuana will stay criminalized, as all other illegal drugs, IMO for a couple of decades...oh and the invcasions are neccesary, you moron....anyway if you want to namedrop a good recent Democrat president, pick...welll, just don´t pick that antisemite Jimmy Carter, Malaise forever......
...if you´re so woried about Marijuana decriminalization think how the fuck you´d be abke to smoke with a taliban like regimen imposssed on you, judged by Sharia´a law instead of Common law.