• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: andyturbo

Acid - Double/Triple Dipped; Is it all bullshit?

It's like paint :p

2 thin coats is better than one thick one, it gets a better finish!!! hahaha

Look the paper would dissolve or it would break up if you just SOAKED it. When things are Double dipped also you will notice, If you get sumthin, dip it, let it dry than dip it again. rather than SOAK, its Mass will be more when you bring it out from DIPPING. We did this in Physics...

So yeah, there is truth in it. Only one way to know... As LSD is the same, just the strengths from DIPPING are different!

SpecTBK=D
 
^ you talk some crap sometimes mate, no offence or anything and i write this to you in good faith, but you never have anything to back up what you say.
 
Psychadelic_Paisly said:
^^^^ Can you tell us the purpose of this? I can't fathom why they wouldn't have, say, a 300ug bath of LSD liquid, soak the sheet in it till it couldn't take up anymore, dry the sheet, voila.

Not saying it's true, but maybe the guys double dipped due to the 'myth' (if that's what it is) being out there???

hmmmm.... I just don't see the reasoning....

Phase Dancer, any ideas using chem etc.???
Click to expand...

You would have a definite issue with ensuring an even concentration of active chemical across all the blotters. You cannot guarantee that 20mg will be absorbed by the 100 tabs you're dipping in it. You cannot guarantee that all of the acid will be absorbed full stop. .
The most logical way (imo) to vary the strength of the tab would indeed be to vary the concentration of the acid dissolved in its solvent, but there are most likely many more variables to take into account than that.

Temperature?
Purity of said acid?
Length of time paper was dipped?
A regular concentration of lsd throughout the whole bath? After each sheet has been dipped?
 
having done loads of acid over the last 10 years i have encountered the double and triple dipped blotter. i used to buy from people who got the pure fluffy needle like LSD crytals and then they would put in into solution, they would then dip the sheets, and they would always dip them at least twice. These folks were crazy though. i watched one guy sniff a bump of the acid crystal, looked to be 5-10 miligrams. he was fucked up for 3 days.
 
^ you talk some crap sometimes mate, no offence or anything and i write this to you in good faith, but you never have anything to back up what you say.
Click to expand...

I dont see anything there needing backing up! Its plain fact, you leave paper in water to soak, it breaks up, whereas if you dip it and then let it dry, then dip it again you will get alot more mass, as you are not losing the particles of the *host* that you are using.

We did this in Physics, we tested soaking paper in water and, dipping then drying then dipping again, The paper weighed more when we dipped and re-dipped rather than letting it sit there and soak!

As for the Paint... it was merely a remark to the saying... 2 thins coats is better than 1 thick.... I mean have you not heard that saying before?

SpecTBK=D
 
^^^ it's hardly paper, it's is much more cardboard like... I also don't believe the correlation between paint and LSD is comaparable... Two totally different substances...
 
I think with regards to the paint, he is just using a figure of speech, like a cliche, just none of us have heard it... he isnt ACTUALLY saying that paint correlates well with acid.

And, paper, cardboard, its close enough to the same that what he's saying would still apply. wet cardboard would start to break down (or break up, either way) if you SOAK it for a period of time.

Also as i said, soaking for any period longer than a second or two on a second dipping would result in redissolving of the original dose anyway. i spose thats why it is called 'Dipping' and not 'double soaked.'

i was wondering, what was the justification for your school doing a soaking Vs. dipping paper tabs and then drying and weighing them? were they doing a "how to make the drugs you're not going to make when you leave school" class? that'd be sweet but somehow i think not...

peece.
 
i thought Flexistentialist had answered this - its about how many crystals that can fit on the blotter. Dipping it again would be a sign of someone fucking it up the first dip as opposed to an attempt to place more crystals onto the blotter itself.
 
Last edited:
Sup chugs, i think i answered it (since Flex didnt reply).

Because DOB can be used in blotters too, and you can fit up to 4 or 5 milligrams in blotters, that it is probably quite possible to fit a lot more LSD crystal into the blotter. a quick second dip will not redissolve the first product, and will result in a new layer forming on the second dip, and absorbing as it drys.

if you use a two or three times stronger solution, then you will probably soak up that much more crystal, too, proving that extra absorption would also be possible. maybe read my other post.

peece.
 
but if you dipped a blotter into a solution how do ones know how much is actually going onto it? Is there a constant rate as to how many crystals would fit on the blotter in a set period of time? If you dipped it in one solution and got X amount how would you know the next dipping would multiple the amount of crystals on the tab, or just say deposit only 1/3 more onto it?

worse still when a sheet of blotter is dipped how can you be sure that that the solution is evenly distrubited across the sheet?

come on you LSD manufacturers, come on to bluelight and tell us your secrets
 
i was wondering, what was the justification for your school doing a soaking Vs. dipping paper tabs and then drying and weighing them? were they doing a "how to make the drugs you're not going to make when you leave school" class? that'd be sweet but somehow i think not...
Click to expand...

I honestly have no Idea ay! :P hehehe but like the class was arguing, we were doing a thing on absorption and then the argument arose, so it wasn't Curricular, it was just to settle a dispute within the class... (dont you just love classes that go off topic all the time)... Do you get more mass when you soak something, or does it get more mass when you dip it and re-dip it. Or Something like that.

The teacher suggested using a sponge, I said no we cant use a sponge... for obvious reason! then we came across the idea of using Paper... So, we did!

And what do ya know... The results were as I said above in my other post.

And anyway P/P. Cardboard and Paper are the same it's just that it finely chopped for paper and alot less fine with cardboard... I swear from some of the Dodgy's You get LSD from when you look at the tab you could piece together a Nutri-Grain box....

SpecTBK =D
 
R-Boy, the DOB "blotters" I saw in the early 1980s were not blotters in the ordinary sense. They consisted of a spongy material similar to cigarette filter, about 3mm thick, bound on one side by a plastic film with a chequerboard pattern. They were known as "tiles" as that is what they resembled.

I presume this unusual construction was used to get a dose in the 1-3mg range (likely the former, as an individual hit was not very strong). So I wouldn't use the DOB example to presume you could get even 1mg on a normal blotter.

BTW, these "tiles" did not provide a particularly user-friendly experience, and after a while you couldn't have given them away among my crowd.
 
Whether or not actually laying a sheet of blotter in LSD / alcohol solution twice increases the dose shouldn't be the question.

The question should be Why would anyone bother to "double dip" when they can make strong blotter by simply using a higher concentration LSD / alcohol solution.

Acid only needs to be layed onto blotter once. "Double dipped" etc is at best slang for strong acid, and at worst just a bullshit sales-pitch like "Yeah man, straight from Amsterdam".
 
Special-T.B.K said:
I dont see anything there needing backing up! Its plain fact, you leave paper in water to soak, it breaks up, whereas if you dip it and then let it dry, then dip it again you will get alot more mass, as you are not losing the particles of the *host* that you are using.

We did this in Physics, we tested soaking paper in water and, dipping then drying then dipping again, The paper weighed more when we dipped and re-dipped rather than letting it sit there and soak!

As for the Paint... it was merely a remark to the saying... 2 thins coats is better than 1 thick.... I mean have you not heard that saying before?

SpecTBK=D
Click to expand...

That's nice mate..... 8)
 
How bout we only post if we know the answer, instead of guessing and metaphors?
->
But I agree with->
"Double dipped" etc is at best slang for strong acid, and at worst just a bullshit sales-pitch like "Yeah man, straight from Amsterdam".
-Flexistentialist
->
 
So using paint as an example in this scenario is just silly, imo
Click to expand...

What do you think they use to thin paint? ALCOHOL....

As I said, wasn't an example. Merely a remark.... Did anyone here go to school? cause no-one seems to be able to read....

SpecTBK=D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top