Ham-milton
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2007
- Messages
- 5,738
I was looking for information about the actual abuse potential of pseudoephedrine after some moron was comparing it to cocaine in OD (after snorting a tablet 8) )
I'm assuming that they only used 6 monkeys in total for this study; I'm not sure how many monkeys they typically use for these sorts of things. That might be a bit small. Then again, how many monkeys do you turn into jonkeys? (get it? 8) )
10-33x less potent would put this in a dosing range 2.5-8.2g assuming a quarter gram of cocaine for recreational purposed. I'd like to know how much they were actually using on a mg/kg basis. That seems awfully high though. I found a site saying 1.2g was a fatal dose and just adjusted downward. I have very limited cocaine experience.
Wouldn't the required dose make it toxic for monkeys? That would be a shitload for a human.
All of these different ephedrine are a little confusing to me, but in this case, the +/- is the difference in rotation of the alpha methyl group, right? Then the difference between pseudo and ephedrine is the rotation of the beta hydroxy, right?
I'm assuming that they only used 6 monkeys in total for this study; I'm not sure how many monkeys they typically use for these sorts of things. That might be a bit small. Then again, how many monkeys do you turn into jonkeys? (get it? 8) )
10-33x less potent would put this in a dosing range 2.5-8.2g assuming a quarter gram of cocaine for recreational purposed. I'd like to know how much they were actually using on a mg/kg basis. That seems awfully high though. I found a site saying 1.2g was a fatal dose and just adjusted downward. I have very limited cocaine experience.
Wouldn't the required dose make it toxic for monkeys? That would be a shitload for a human.
Document title
Reinforcing effect of pseudoephedrine isomers and the mechanism of action
Authors
WEE Sunmee (1) ; ORDWAY Gregory A. (1) ; WOOLVERTON William L. (1) ;
Authors' Affiliations
(1) Department of Psychiatry and Pharmacology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216-4505, ETATS-UNIS
Abstract
It has been proposed that ephedrine and its isomers may have abuse potential. When made available to rhesus monkeys (n 4) for self-administration, (+)-pseudoephedrine functioned as a positive reinforcer in all monkeys, as did (-)-pseudoephedrine in two of three monkeys. Pseudoephedrine isomers were 10- to 33-fold less potent than cocaine. In in vitro binding in monkey brain tissue, both isomers had low affinity for dopamine and serotonin transporters by at least 200-fold relative to cocaine, but comparable affinity for norepinephrine transporters. (+)-Pseudoephedrine also blocked dopamine uptake in 293 hDAT cells with low potency relative to cocaine. When given in vivo (+)-pseudoephedrine significantly displaced radioligand binding to dopamine transporters with a potency comparable to that in self-administration. Therefore, pseudoephedrine isomers can function as reinforcers and the mechanism at dopamine transporters may underlie this effect. However, pseudoephedrine appears to be a weak reinforcer and may have relatively low abuse potential.
All of these different ephedrine are a little confusing to me, but in this case, the +/- is the difference in rotation of the alpha methyl group, right? Then the difference between pseudo and ephedrine is the rotation of the beta hydroxy, right?
