OK. I'll be brief. I feel you've been doing what William Burroughs or Lenny Bruce would call "making" a doctor. But what you're seeking is not a scrip but approval and validation for using opiates obtained illegally and self-medicating with a somewhat diseased body and risking some very serious complications. Your resident MD in training is learning a lot from talking to you but he's not authorized to write the scrips you need. And you have no assurance he'll ever play that role for you.
I don't care what DT means or why you think some kind of test can prove that you're takng exactly what you would be taking if there had been a MD RXing you what you want. I think this is BS and self deception that could hurt you in the long run because the longer you go without any real medical supervision the more likely something will happen that makes the house of cards collapse.
You don't want to have to give a UA sample because of urinary catheter seems to me is a very lame excuse.
99% of the MDs at pain management clinics would either reject you outright or put you on the lowest possible opiate dose and have the most intrusive monitoring they can think of.
Get on MMT and give them the UAs and have them all come back clean and after a year in the US under the 1970 rules you could be going in weekly to get 6 bottles and divvy them up as you please except on the one day a week you attend clinic. Every clinic has some back and forth of bottles changing hands, whether trading for money or sex or whatever, it's a fungible and valuable good and maybe during that first year you could become buddies with another client who gets sizeable takehomes and so when your daily observed dose wears off and you feek pain maybe you'll take some of those extras you got somehow or other. It happens at every clinic. Those with more somehow find a way of sharing them with others.
I think it's BS to be buying Suboxone strips on the street to treat your pain off the books because MDs will see it as just one more opiate addiction using street drugs. Their DT doesn't prove anything and your records of what you say you took don't mean anything.
I'm really confused? 8(

I believe you entirely misinterpreted my post. I wasn't asking for any type of analysis on your part. I was just curious how the methadone system worked & since you responded in such detail that I figured I'd be courteous & respond in kind. I didn't ask to be psycho analyzed over the internet.
I don't have the time ATM to give a in depth reply (EDIT: I ended up being verbose as I usually am

). I made time for my last post explaining the situation. The Dr. (resident) in question just like every other Dr. I've been able to see since the one Dr. dropped all his patients & moved out of state isn't advocating for me buying buprenorphine or even getting it scripted as any kind of ideal situation. He would like to just write me the scripts that I need. That would be the ideal situation as he has stated to me.
Ideally Dr.'s would not have to worry about issues such as government, society, the "almighty $" or even the dubious moral crusades that people who's intentions being well or not so engage in that interfere with the practice of medicine. Sadly enough that isn't the case in reality. Clearly we don't live in an ideal world. At least in this particular context. Well in any context we don't live in an ideal world but I digress. In this case I'm referring to the fact that as I stated sadly enough outside factors interfere with the practice of medicine.
I'm quite confused by your statement of "I don't care what DT means or why". A DT is short hand for a "Drug Test". In many cases it is synonymous with UA or urinalysis. Quite often the terms are used interchangeably to the best of my knowledge.
Regardless of that fact; there are other forms of drug testing outside of urinalysis. There are oral & blood testing methods as well as hair for that matter. All are less invasive & painful in my situation. I'm not going to go into details regarding my anatomy but there is no reason I would voluntarily submit myself to something that causes my irritation, pain & to be blunt "piss red" for a few days. It's patently absurd that UA is somehow a superior method than other methods of drug testing. All of which can have a quite high degree of inaccuracy in case you were unaware of the literature regarding the topic.
Moving on my records do mean something. My records showed that the Dr. was incorrect in there assumption that prescribing methadone for pain was not allowed outside of a clinic structure. US federal law differs on methadone prescribing for pain as opposed to for addiction. My prescriptions where & always will be for pain management. As such the prescribing guidelines that applied to my case where that of pain management not of addiction treatment. As such there is a completely different prescribing protocol. In any case state law supersedes federal law & in this case again state law differs greatly in the prescribing of methadone for pain as opposed to addiction. Thus the reason for my records. The pill bottle labels showed the Dr. that they where wrong in there assumption. Which is often what's needed for someone to take the time & actually listen to you but I digress.
Upon seeing the relevant records they took the time to stop talking out there ass & go on the internet to the relevant section of prescribing law on the appropriate .gov address as well as to the relevant prescribing legalities for the state I'm located in & proceed accordingly. They realized they were in the wrong, apologized & we moved on. As I stated there is a lot of misconceptions regarding methadone usage in the USA. That would be why I was curious about the clinic system. There are a lot of misconceptions & was curious as to some information regarding said system which again I thank you for providing.
However there are also a ton of misconceptions regarding methadone & it's use in pain management. There are some Dr.'s who believe it is a great analgesic & use it almost exclusively. I saw some Dr.'s that felt that way for a period of my life until the attached hospital such down there pain clinic. No fault to either myself or the Dr. it was a business decision. Regardless as a result I was & am very aware of prescribing regulations regarding methadone & it's usage in pain management. I also feel that it is a useful tool in the opioid analgesic tool-belt & feel that it fits certain patients particularly well as do certain other analgesics. Every individidual is just that; an individual. Based on physiology, metabolism, liver enzymes, etc. as well as the problems causing each individual to feel pain each individuals circumstances are likely to be unique to that individual. As such each patient will respond differently to particular opioid (& non opioid for that matter) analgesics & as such each patient should have the analgesics used in there treatment also be individualized. In some cases methadone is the "extended" medication of choice (though in some cases it is closer to a mid duration but I digress) of choice. In other cases the physician & the patient as well; as a good Dr. will include the feelings & responses of the patient to the treatment in the treatment plan; will decide on say an extended release version of morphine, oxymorphone or hydromorphone. Perhaps even a fentanyl transdermal system. It really depends on the patient.
So basically what I was trying to say is that keeping records & in the example I had given previously (that perhaps was misinterpreted?) was for the purposes of clearing up a misconception regarding the prescribing requirements surrounding the usage of methadone in pain management as opposed it's usage in addiction treatment. Two very different usage case scenarios with widely divergent requirements & legalities surrounding there prescribing & dispensing practices. My apologies if there was a misconception somehow & I didn't clearly convey that my interest may have been related to a personal circumstance but is for all intents & purposes at this point academic.
As I stated if I was to go on buprenorphine for pain it would be in the form of Belbuca because as we both can agree Suboxone is not indicated for pain management. At this point everything with my Dr. has been discussed not put down on paper. Though I took an oral drug test with the intention of getting my methadone prescription restored test was not entered into my medical record. I had an agreement with the Dr. that if they where unable to prescribe me my medication as they wanted to do after being made aware of my situation vis a vis getting needlessly dropped when I'm a legitimate pain patient & them agreeing with my sentiment that "other people overdosing on street drugs such as fentanyl analogues does not have anything to do with pain patients & should not affect there treatment". In fact they agreed wholeheartedly & stated how they somewhat regretted there career path due to the government intrusion into medical care. They stated that with all the government & insurance BS as you say that they spend far less time helping people than they want to. Helping people is the reason they got into medicine & are disappointed by how hard that is to do. I feel for the Dr. & in no way blame him. I understand that they are put in a shit position.
I digress though & become extremely verbose. Again you have my apologies. However; I will state that regardless of any miscommunication that may have occurred there is no need to be hostile. Even if you erroneously believed that I was asking for a psycho analysis there is no need to refer to my physical issues as a "lame excuse". Maybe for you adding more pain & difficulty urinating when you already have pain & difficulty urinating to be a "lame excuse". I just find it to be a part of being me & getting through the day. As I stated I have no reason to inflict additional difficulties & pain upon myself when there are alternative forms of drug testing. Not that drug testing is particularly accurate or needed for that matter. I'm a chronic pain patient. If you feel that government intrusion on pain patients is something to be celebrated that's your opinion. My opinion is that drug testing of chronic pain patients is not something to be celebrated. I can understand the rationality behind testing people that have given a reason for the system to do so such as selling there prescription. Though I don't agree with drug testing in general. I'm more of a personal freedom; your body, your choice; kind of person. I say to each his own though. If your opinion differs that is your choice. It's your body it's your choice but don't force your choice on others. Also just because I understand the rationality behind something doesn't mean that I agree with the rationality.
Understanding something does not mean that one agrees with it.

You may be right that 99% of pain management Dr.'s would try to do low dose intensive monitoring. However; you'd be wrong in thinking that's what they want to do. From my experience & that of others in the pain community the Dr.'s are acting out of fear. If they where allowed to practice medicine as they chose to it would be a different situation. Again every Dr. is different but anecdotally from personal experience & that of others in the pain community (I'm active in various pain groups & forums, etc.) many Dr.'s are just doing what they feel they are forced to do. If given the choice they to practice medicine un-beholden to any interests be they financial, governmental or societal they would practice medicine in a very different manner than the way it is currently practiced. Again this is from experience I can't speak for others outside of those I've spoken to.
As for the rest of your statement recommending I go to a clinic & get take homes & find a buddie, trading for sex or buying I don't know where to start. I didn't imply that I use substances in that manner. (Not that there's anything wrong with that & at times in my life have done so; as I would think most members here have)
If I somehow mistakenly gave off the impression that I was just looking to abuse methadone my apologies. I'm looking into all this in the context of pain management & the fact that the ideal world doesn't exist. I have to work with the options presented to me. Be that through societal or financial means or a combination of both & other factors.
You may think it's BS to be buying buprenorphine & dosing it the same as one would if prescribed Belbuca but that's your opinion. To me there is little difference between my usage of buprenorphine (or any other analgesic for that matter) & the usage of Belbuca. Since buprenorphine is the opioid in question I refer to Belbuca. If I'm taking the same substance I have a hard time seeing how the substance magically becomes different because it's prescribed? As I stated Dr.'s have no problem with this. The reason I mentioned methadone is because from past experience it works better. My Dr.'s are aware of this. Thus why they also where hoping I could find a way to get back on methadone or another full agonist. It would greatly simplify upcoming surgeries & procedures (though they are postponed ATM due to the Covid situation) as well as & more importantly give me a higher quality of life once again. My quality of life shouldn't be dictated by the whims of government or society when it's known what works to help improve said quality of life at a reasonable cost. The medications are not overly expensive it's just the BS as you called it; that's in between. It's just that I see a very different form of BS.
Hopefully this post has clarified for you what I was trying to say & you also see the difference. Again my apologies if I wasn't clear the first time. Feel free to let me know what I may have said that gave off such a wrong impression. I try to remain positive & see this miscommunication as an opportunity to see where I may have made a mistake in communicating what I was trying to express. I'm on the autism spectrum (Asperger's) & do my best to communicate as clearly as possible. Occasionally miscommunications do occur though & apparently that has happened here. Unless for some reason after this post you still have an issue with what I'm saying in which case I guess I just have to wait for your reply & see what reason that could possibly be? As by now with how verbose I was in my reply & reiterate my point I hope that I got said point across!
Edited: Double posted a sentence