Why does it make you feel uncomfortably submissive? One of the wonderful things about prayer, is that it helps us to submit which is the way to peace. Failure to submit tends to result in suffering - when we want things to be different from how they are or can be. In my opinion, the ego, the sense of identity most people have, is unreal but it blocks awareness of the true self which is one with God. Thus, the purpose of submissive prayer is to help one lay down his or her ego. To state and realize its inferiority openly and recognize that God is the only one who can actually do anything. All the ego does, is get in the way of God's work. So by letting go of the ego, by seeing it for what it is, it vanishes leaving only God or the Self. From this state of consciousness, even other people are seen as a part of the one Self and this is how it is possible to love ytour neighbor as yourself as Jesus commands (because your neighbor is your self).
Well, I am not christian and I don't actually believe in the existence of the christian god. But thats not the point really...
I don't see what is so sacred about surrender to an all powerful deity. At the same time, I don't see the point or benefit of resistance too, but I feel resistant when I think about christianity as it is relatively meaningless and depressing for me. It paradoxical to use surrender and submission to atain some form of (presumably) higher consciousness or connection with a higher power. The two ideals cancel each other out, to my mind at least...
I think that humans surrendering the capacity to think fully for ourselves has accidentally/clumsily released a whole lot of pain on earth; people that allow, and even expect "god", to control them have been responsible for way too much sufferring by presuming that they truly know the will or thoughts of god. Doing this idea of gods will has often been destructive. To be fair, it certainly hasn't always been so...
That said, I wouldn't ever actively destroy peoples right to believe and worship god, firstly because I respect human freedom and secondly because I think that the belief in god is starting to destroy itself. I simply hope that it doesn't destroy the whole world in doing so...
When it comes to the ego, I agree that it is beneficial to put it aside and not fight this process, but replacing it with a supreme deity is a cop out. Sometimes, the process of ego-loss and diminshment makes one aware that existence is a kind of 'front' for an actual emptiness or inner void or chaos (chaos in the cosmic sense of emtpiness/nothingness), and that there is more emptiness in the mind then many are prepared to accept. It seems that god is used replace the ego and I think that is quite foolish, and just another type of 'sacred egoism'. Going into a psychedelic experience with the intent or desire of surrendering to god or a higher/supreme being makes me uncomfortable because, when I am tripping hard, I find it virtually impossible to lie or deceive myself about anything, including the idea that god exists. It can sort of compound the isolation of ego-loss, because the fact that god does not exist in the personal manner of the christian god is glaringly obvious. I've known people to get very upset and panicked when they are undergoing this intense psychedelic experience because their pre-existing concept of christian god/yahweh seems to be absent or false and it frightens them, when the reality is that the god or supreme being that DOES exist is inside you, right now and always. You need to be open, resisting the urge to articulate/describe/categorise and/or reason out your experience, but stay aware and allow the basic knowledge or gnosis to become you (since it already is...

) Non-dual surrender/resistance..
Agnostic or pantheistic people often have more rewarding or truer experiences; at least in my opinion they do..
THAT SAID, I do think its important to be able to FULLY surrender oneself if neccesary as it can be a useful and helpful defense against spiritual and existential crisis.
Loving your neighbour because they are "yourself" is pretty shallow. Why not love them because they are simply who they are?
Ismene said:
Is the Hindu religion any less poisonous than the christian? Look at the abominable treatment they dish out to the poor and helpless "untouchables" - the ones that the wacky Hindu creed believes are only fit to clean their masters shit off the toilet basin.
I agree that Hinduism, in practise at least, can be pretty fucked up; but then, most tools that humans use can be corrupted to a certain degree. I see a difference between people that follow an interpretation of a religion, and the actual doctrine and wisdom of that particular religion. The enacting of jesus' teachings are very different to the simplicty of the teachings themselves. People who try to emulate god invariably get it wrong; I wonder why?
But either way, I'd say christianity is the most destructive relgious idea to ever exist. I say that for many reasons, not discounting the terrible transgressions of the past (crusades, witch burnings, inquisition, repression of scientific truth, violent discrimination of people, greed, etc) but also from extrapolation from the present. The world is troubled and seems to be heading towards a pretty dark future and there is no doubt a connection between that trouble and the major religions, with the most dominant being christianity (mainly roman catholocisim...) Maybe I am expecting too much from what should be a peaceful doctrine, or maybe I am painting the world as darker then it is, but either way, if a majority of people believe in acertain being and order their lives accordingly and there is also an abundance of pain, the link between the two is true enough (IMO).