A Hollow Earth

[One Thousand Words]

You can't star watch underground

[video=youtube_share;jqADHn7SWlA]http://youtu.be/jqADHn7SWlA[/video]

 

[ebola?]

So what is perfect? To rest on that?

Er...I don't know what you're asking.

Could you elaborate more on what you mean by geometric acrobatics?

A radial ratio of approximately .273 seems pretty unremarkable to me. It's only with a very convoluted elaboration that it would seem "perfect".

ebola

 

[Vurtual]

I remember reading a Brinsley Le Poer Trench book about the hollow earth in younger days and not being thast impressed (and i was fairly easily impressed then). I don't think anyone mentioned it, but i seem to remember that famous photo of the hole in the north pole being explained as an artefact of how they stiched together multiple satellite photos.

Now if it was 'Advanced Supersonic Nazi Hell Creatures from Beneath the Hollow Earth' i'd be more interested (but maybe i shouldn't mention such esoteric matters...)

 

[Ninae]

By the way, I've for a long time suspected Tolkien's "Middle-Earth" was actually supposed to be the Inner Earth, or the location within the crust of the Earth - hence the term "Middle-Earth", situated between the surface world and the Hollow Earth.

And of course there we had all kinds of enchantment and magic, different civilisations, elves and dwarves, etc. but above all more magical (or technological). Tolkien was also a very highly accomplished Esoterocist/Occultist/Free Mason, etc. At least he was very extensively studied in these matters, and in fact I've heard there are many who actually believe his books tell the history of this world in mythological form (Pagans).

Incidentally, I also just came across someone else with the same view, or that it's actually the Middle-Earth in question. While up until now it has only been a figment of my imagination (but one that makes sense if you put two and two together). But of course the whole subject matter is so far-out there I wouldn't expect any belief from many.

 

[What 23]

What observed phenomena does this parsimoniously explain?

ebola

Er...I don't know what you're asking.



A radial ratio of approximately .273 seems pretty unremarkable to me. It's only with a very convoluted elaboration that it would seem "perfect".

ebola

Well, perfect was more for me tied to that the Great Pyramid has been shown in its form to have this proportion with Earth and Moon, as shown, and that this simple geometry has also been found in human form. Maybe you can debunk this, though, in some way? Also what is perfect is that this structure is as said, central to all land mass. Its a mystery, perhaps some might rest on "just coincidence", but it is still holding with some centrality. The ratio of .273... I don't know. I was going off of other relationships (edit: well not other relationships, sorry, but the way I viewed it, not as a specific number only). But maybe something I am having a hard time saying.

As well, perfect how the moon fits so nicely over the sun.

I don't mean to divert from the thread though. Maybe there are other, more symbolic/abstract reasons for these stories to have come about? Like a truth behind myth?

 

[ebola?]

Also what is perfect is that this structure is as said, central to all land mass. Its a mystery, perhaps some might rest on "just coincidence", but it is still holding with some centrality.

With enough mathematical convolution, one can easily run into a large number of merely coincidental connections between disparate phenomena.

ebola

 

[What 23]

By the way, I've for a long time suspected Tolkien's "Middle-Earth" was actually supposed to be the Inner Earth, or the location within the crust of the Earth - hence the term "Middle-Earth", situated between the surface world and the Hollow Earth.

And of course there we had all kinds of enchantment and magic, different civilisations, elves and dwarves, etc. but above all more magical (or technological). Tolkien was also a very highly accomplished Esoterocist/Occultist/Free Mason, etc. At least he was very extensively studied in these matters, and in fact I've heard there are many who actually believe his books tell the history of this world in mythological form (Pagans).

Incidentally, I also just came across someone else with the same view, or that it's actually the Middle-Earth in question. While up until now it has only been a figment of my imagination (but one that makes sense if you put two and two together). But of course the whole subject matter is so far-out there I wouldn't expect any belief from many.

But do you "believe" it yourself?

I've entertained an idea that what we see as aliens may come from within, and that these aliens might be the fairies, angels, demons that we have in our myth. My ideas arent solely my own.

But maybe its neither in/under or out/above, and both.

On the person you met, did this just come about? Did he or she say it without your first input, while the thought had been on your mind? Curious. As this interests me.

 

[What 23]

With enough mathematical convolution, one can easily run into a large number of merely coincidental connections between disparate phenomena.

ebola

The math is pretty simple. Far from convoluted.

 

[Ninae]

I just read it here today. It pretty well ties together this and the 2012 thread. So make of it what you will, I think I have done my part.

http://http://lightworkers.org/channeling/197731/time-now-answers-masters-ashira-aramda-eaynu-one-who-serves-given-during-our-prepa

 

[ebola?]

The math is pretty simple. Far from convoluted.

It's convoluted enough that one could produce a very large array of alternate ways of mathemizing the relation through geometry, so it's expected that one of them would seem "meaningful" due to chance.

ebola

 

[What 23]

With enough mathematical convolution, one can easily run into a large number of merely coincidental connections between disparate phenomena.

ebola

I was and am still doubtful of this observation of it being central, but can you clearly disprove it for me? Not that this is the only thing to do with it that is fascinating to me, with its gravity. But like I said I've always questioned this, though it sounds cool, and it's something I'd like to see as true. But if it's proven not in these ways of science, I can accept that.

I guess doing a search I did find this, easily: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographical_centre_of_Earth, which puts it somewhere in Turkey.

This guy has been over some stuff, as well.

Still, I find relationship with it, and it has been along the same strings, as many other things important. How to say it right is a mystery to me, right now, though.

 

[CoffeeDrinker]

Never mind...I don't think you really get it. The people who have spoken of it have been geniuses in their fields holding high positions, if you had bothered to look into it. So the combined witnessing is something I think should be taken seriously.

Anyway, a little bird whispers in my ear you would rather argue and try to bring down threads, than discuss and exchange ideas and information.

But each to their own....it's a beautiful world. Besides "proof" generally have no place in a philosophical and spiritual forum. That's part of its very nature.

I respect people's right to believe whatever the hell they want, but when the belief is retarded I respect people's rights to use the word retarded when discussing said beliefs.


Also, wild speculation related to someone's disappearance in the most treacherous ocean on earth doesn't really prove anything. Perhaps people get lost in the north pole because it's cold or they hit an iceberg?

 

[Ninae]

I respect people's right to believe whatever the hell they want, but when the belief is retarded I respect people's rights to use the word retarded when discussing said beliefs.


Also, wild speculation related to someone's disappearance in the most treacherous ocean on earth doesn't really prove anything. Perhaps people get lost in the north pole because it's cold or they hit an iceberg?

The radars show the plane just vanishing in thin air - not a fact many want to relate to.

 

[alasdairm]

It's only with a very convoluted elaboration that it would seem "perfect".

if you want to read more convoluted nonsense, look no further than: Synchronicity

alasdair

 

[What 23]

It might be difficult to follow for you, yes. I guess if you haven't lived it, I can see that. I can see that, but I can't really see it. I've only lived what I have.

The example you gave me at the end of that (trying to say I was wrong, right?), was a post that was, for you- in your time zone, posted at 23:23, so there. It began with me saying that, with humor, "oh, because it was posted at xx:23?", and this kind of got you a little aggravated, I guess, and you refused to see the surface. You said "why not some other number? Out of all of these numbers, you picked the one with 23, to pay attention to.". And I said "Yea dude, thread starter.", and further found that for you even it was posted at 23:23. Listen I have this gun, right hur. You are welcome to shoot me with it. In the temple.

...Then I did get a bit convoluted, and further tried to drive the point in, but you were long gone. Keep on skipping along. Pick and choose. Cherry pick. I get what I am presented. And you just don't want to see it, so I guess you won't.

 

[alasdairm]

my last post was at 10:27 - what is the relevance of that?

maybe it's not that i don't get it, that i don't follow? maybe i totally get it. maybe i follow it fine and just think it's a load of absolute confirmation-bias-addled nonsense.

when all you have is a hammer...

alasdair

 

[What 23]

you aren't relevant, that's what (joking, as i know this can't be). maybe i have the hammer, yea.

not that 10:27 isn't somehow relevant. it's all relevant. it's how it's arranged, to see. i like beauty.

you are really arrogant.


you seem to always forget that i'm in a different time zone/that everyone on bluelight is not in california, and that your post wasn't at 10:27 for me. you seem to only see things from your narrow view. for me it was 13:27. this is one reason i focused on, in the thread you pointed to, last, in the synchronicity thread, for me, the minutes, first. they are common between us. i see that. here, what is the relevance of my last post occurring at xx:00? hey? for me it was 15:00. For you it was 12:00. In order to have a discussion we must first find the common languages/strings. you neglect this. the world just revolves around you, doesn't it?

 

[Ninae]

By the way, I can also recall a quote made by Princess Diana before she died:

"The obsession with Scotland is because it has so many entrances into the Inner-Earth where aliens reside."

You can make of that what you will, as it's only one of many sources.

 

[What 23]

That is definitely interesting, if she did in fact say that.

 

[alasdairm]

your narrow view

oh lol.

for me it was 13:27

what's so magical about 13:27 then? the fact is that, in every other case before, you've had to dig for a contrived connection between (to me) otherwise disparate things. i've said it before and i'll say it again, they might be mysteriously and wondrously connected but it's also just as likely (to me far, far more likely) that they're not.

the world just revolves around you, doesn't it?

if you think that's what i'm saying you're just not listening. the irony

i've said all along that you might be right but that there is also another, far more ordinary explanation for the wonder you're seeing. you're the one saying (or at very least implying) that you're right and i'm wrong. who's the arrogant one?

alasdair