Dresden
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2010
- Messages
- 3,212
What if we named pea's and amphetamines with benzene as the base of the molecule. It may very well be a better, simpler way to name. For example,
So, methamphetamine becomes 1-(2-methylaminopropyl)-benzene.
MDMA becomes 1-(2-methylaminopropyl)-(3,4-methylenedioxy)-benzene.
Mescaline becomes 2-aminoethyl-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzene.
2ce becomes 2-aminoethyl-4-ethyl-2,5-dimethoxybenzene.
1-(2-aminopropyl)-3,4-dichlorobenzene, etc.
I think this way is better and simpler, and opsin recognizes it just fine.
Likewise, the trypts can be named with indole as the base.
This method is just much more basic, as benzene is seen as the core of the molecule rather than some aminoethyl or 2-(methyl)aminopropyl side chain.
So, methamphetamine becomes 1-(2-methylaminopropyl)-benzene.
MDMA becomes 1-(2-methylaminopropyl)-(3,4-methylenedioxy)-benzene.
Mescaline becomes 2-aminoethyl-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzene.
2ce becomes 2-aminoethyl-4-ethyl-2,5-dimethoxybenzene.
1-(2-aminopropyl)-3,4-dichlorobenzene, etc.
I think this way is better and simpler, and opsin recognizes it just fine.
Likewise, the trypts can be named with indole as the base.
This method is just much more basic, as benzene is seen as the core of the molecule rather than some aminoethyl or 2-(methyl)aminopropyl side chain.
Last edited:
