• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: Tronica

. . 8balls in Perth

i see speed more often that i see meth, but i guess it is just one of those, 'who you know' things, not that i know a lot of 'those types' but i supose there are link to some adn not to others...

coke in perht is bad imo, crappy expensive and really cut up.... pfft... there is no trade for it, so people dont gfet it in. the only time it was going to be here, the boat got policed... hahah...

i mean you can get it, but its just not the easiest...

personally, i wouldnt use anything that was a colour for no reason, if it is suposed to be white, then it should be white... i mean come on.. thats prob red phosphourous of something.. GROSS!!!

why would you want to use speed adn coke together? i thought they were completly separate, but dealers cut them together, as a cheapener...
 
oop, sorry phase.. my bad.
didn't word it too well - but do know not to talk availability.


anyways.. the comments pretty much confirm what i was thinking...
which was along the lines that maybe this was good quality amph/meth with a lil dose coke in for extra effect - and bigger asking price.
*sighs



there IS a market for coke in perth, dammit.
there IS.


*joins markler in the one-person-demand corner
 
Source of information.

One only needs to look at the purity of seized coke. While some might argue that low purity from SA countries might simply reflect the techniques used to manufacture the coke, as most coke seized is said to be percentage wise, in the mid-high 70's, I would say that in many instances, something has likely been added. (check DEA or other drug interception reports)

Another reason I say this is: It has been verified from extractions and tests performed by personal acquaintances on various sources of imported product. The method used is a modified version of the purity test developed by Travnikoff, then an isopropanol extraction (see posts by fastandbulbous & Le Junk), followed by Marquis, and other reagent tests, then another purity test on the cocaine.

In all reports, the separated product shows no meth by simons, but goes instant orange with Marquis and responds to the ninhydrin-hydrindantin primary amine test. I've also received what I regard as fairly reliable reports from friends O/S. Amphetamine is also what's been indicated.

However, I should have added that there have also been quite a few reports of ephedrine being found (removed via a similar process and verified using Simons, Marquis Mecke and Mandelin).

Le Junks posts should also add weight to these claims Le Junk.
 
One only needs to look at the purity of seized coke. While some might argue that low purity from SA countries might simply reflect the techniques used to manufacture the coke, as most coke seized is said to be percentage wise, in the mid-high 70's, I would say that in many instances, something has likely been added. (check DEA or other drug interception reports)

If amphetamines were added, wouldn't it have been mentioned in these reports?

Another reason I say this is: It has been verified from extractions and tests performed by personal acquaintances on various sources of imported product.

But we can't say for sure that what they were testing wasn't stepped on half a dozen times since it arrived in Australia.


In an unsuccessful attempt to add some spark back to overly mannitoled cocaine, amphetamines, ephedrine and psuedo-ephedrine are now being added. This is most likely being added at a very early stage, probably by the very large Mexican cartels that now run the U.S. cocaine trade.

Although I do accept that this is a possibility, I'm just a bit sceptical that this is happening on a production level. And even if this does happen with the Mexican cartels, I believe that this does not reflect on all the cocaine we receive.
 
rah said:
If amphetamines were added, wouldn't it have been mentioned in these reports?

Probably not. The DEA doesnt want to tell people they got 49kg of cocaine with 1kg of amp. They want to tell them they got 50kg of cocaine.

Just like when someone gets caught with a few points of meth, thats been cut to a couple of grams (for ease of snorting etc) by the end user. They get done for a couple of grams of meth. Not 3 points. Never mind that 90%+ is sugar; its a couple of grams of meth to them.



<DISCLAIMER> I've had a LONG day at work, and I'm tired. So what I say may not make sense... moreso then usual.
 
If amphetamines were added, wouldn't it have been mentioned in these reports?
If you check out the DEA's Microgram Bulletins, you will notice that they do give details on cocaine purity - but they are only in percentage of cocaine by mass, ie "Analysis determined 76% cocaine hydrochloride". They generally don't mention what the other 24% constituency was.

This is why phase suggested these reports as a source to support his claim; because most of the cocaine that DEA reports like Microgram discuss is intercepted at the import stage - usually via mail or sea/air freight - so it hasn't had a change to fall into the hands of resident dealers yet. Given that it is imported produce caught during conveyance (and usually traced back to a South American nation big ups to them), it must have been tainted at the point of shipping, by groups sophisticated enough to be organising exports in the tens of kilos, sometimes more.

The question is whether the other shit in there with the coke was added deliberately or whether it is the result of poor extraction/cleaning. Given that coke production is a relatively simple solvent extraction of plant material, I'd say it is more likely that the product was juiced up with an adulterant prior to export.

South Americans aren't silly, they know how to make an extra buck or two aswell.
 
don't waste your money on the "coke" in perth, the few times you do get decent coke here it's been flown in from EST.
 
Top