• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: tryptakid | Foreigner

71 dead found in a truck abandoned in Austria

A bit late in this thread, but IMO the main reason Christianity doesn't have the same problem with Islam in regards to violence or terrorism is because it hasn't evolved with the times, at least as far as in the Middle East. When you're dealing with people that are destitute and held back from the rest of the modern world I think that makes them extremely susceptible to be drawn in by terrorists organizations. That being said, I think the majority of Muslims throughout the world are peaceful, it's just the extremists that give it a bad rap. I mean there's what? 2 billion or so practicing Muslims in the world?

I think you've summed it up really accurately nutty. :)

I also think a lot of the Muslim world has sufferred more from terrible political leaders then through some inherent depravity due to their faith.

If this invasion was carried out like the beach of Normandy surely Europe's military would repel it. But it is 70 people in this truck, 100 people here, 1,000 on this boat, slowly but surely making their way into Europe, establishing their territory as we see in the video of London and trying to subversively detract native Europeans to their cause like this naive Danish girl.

You are simply inventing things. You are making claims about things that you fear will happen. It seems that your fear is causing you to be irrational and to imagine things. Its impossible to argue with you because of your propensity for assumption and invention. There is no way that you can have knowledge of the future that is anything but a guess.

You cannot make a judgment upon millions of individuals based on the actions of a few. You are from the US, I think? Should I be frightened of you because people get shot in the US at a higher rate then some other places? I certainly don't; I find you guys to be really amicable and pleasant. You too may surprise yourself. :D

This is not an invasion; saying so is conspiratorial nonsense. This is an exodus. A lot of the long-term plans of these asylum seekers is to return home when it is safe. Some will choose to stay, that is true. As has happened since time immemorial, these immigrants will just become another facet to their new society. Your myth has never happened whereas my narrative has happened for thousands upon thousands of years. The world will keep spinning.
 
this isn't exactly isolated. or limited to Syrians, or just people looking for temporary accommodations. Europeans are committing demographic suicide.
 
their greater ethnicity (European Peoples), as long as people keep coming, and reproducing, while natives (those with thousands of years heritage in the region), because of different culture, have been producing less, will be (their people) a minority at some point. That is a very real possibility.
not just about ethnicity either but entire culture(s).
 
Last edited:
Today i write to you as young Iraqi woman. Considering gender and race are sicial constructs I pick a choice of races and genders in a hat and thats what I identify as today.

There wasn't 100k murdered in Iraq. Murder is a very specific term. Unlawful preditated killing.

If you were perhaps a lawyer or even educated beyond Rachel Maddow or your far left college prpfessors you'd understand the disticnction.

I counted 6 misspelled words in this short statement...just an observation, professor.

Anyhoo, fine. Where does Jesus say "Go kill (but like, totally not murder) 100,000 people? I guess "turn the other cheek" doesn't exactly apply when we invade a country that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11, even.

How many suicide bombings were there in Iraq before 2003? Take a guess.

NSFW:
the answer is zero


Since 2003 there have been nearly 2,000. What event occurred in 2003 that could have sparked such an increase in mass death?

When your in a foriegn country and all of a sudden are met with a barrage of bullets and return fire thats not murder. There may be 100,000 jilled there but not murdered.

There are plenty of well documented war crimes in which soldiers are either serving time in jail for or the military has looked the other way. Besides, I think bombs and drone missiles aren't in much danger of small arms fire.
 
Last edited:
In the end Iraq was a massive failure. Obama pissed on the graves of thousands of our boys. We elimimated Saddam and we eliminated Osama. In the end though we maintain military bases in Italy and Germany and for what reason? While we withdraw from Iraq and ISIS takes over. The Afghans and Iraqs we trained ended up running at the first sign of trouble and giving their weapons and equipment to terrorists.

Hindsight is 20/20...I can safely say though I remember 9/11 like it was yesterday and you can bet I wanted blood and I wanted it bad.

You can give me statistics all you qant of suicide bombings after 2003? I say how much bombongs before we were attacked? Suicide bombins aren't a symptom of war, just martydom religious extremism.

Cant blame us for them still blowing themselves up.
 
their greater ethnicity (European Peoples), as long as people keep coming, and reproducing, while natives (those with thousands of years heritage in the region), because of different culture, have been producing less, will be (their people) a minority at some point. That is a very real possibility.
not just about ethnicity either but entire culture(s).
lol there is no "european ethnicity". and even if there was, what exactly is the danger in "diluting" it?
 
Well, "White". I know the terminology isn't perfect. Because diluting it on this level would possibly destroy it. Not that you care. You're probably without identity with a people.
 
There is no European ethnicity. There is a European identity, what used to be called "Christendom," although that is no longer really an appropriate term in the religious sense, although culturally perhaps it remains relevant. Either way we can well speak of a European identity, forged in shared history and culture (not to diminish the cultural differences within that region and identity, but there is much shared.) That is what the identitarians in this thread are worried about diluting.
 
have you ever lived in europe or spent a lot of time here?

this european identity evolved with the european union and is about freedom to move, speak and think. and true european spirit isn't about excluding people (but as you can see, the EU commission is on a good way to fuck that up right now). before the EU, there wasn't such a thing as a european identity. and this identity has nothing to do with christianity, which will become more and more unimportant (thankfully).

before this european movement (which began after WWII), we had one war after another and nations despised each other (much more than nowadays), which lead to some of the biggest atrocities and catastrophies of mankind.

and to be honest, those who are against immigration and for closed borders are nationalists and right-wing bastards, who want less EU. only if the EU manages to deal with this mass immigration from the middle east (and africa) in a reasonable and humane way, europe will thrive. if we decide to be selfish and close the borders even more, everything "Europe" and the EU stands for is at stake.

also, the EU features some of the most wealthy nations world wide, and there are enough ressources to face this problem. the only reason why it doesn't happen is (in my opinion) structural racism. couple decades ago, Austria had much more refugees from Hungary and Czechoslovakia, and suprisingly this wasn't a problem back then. but these were times when the Social Democrats could actually be considered "socialist", and probably because people could relate more to their neighbor ethnicities than people from syria (disgusting thought).

Europe has faced the dangers of racism, nationalism and fascism much more than the USA, and even those who never witnessed these times are (or should be) very aware of what this new rise in right-wing thinking might bring.
 
Last edited:
Well, "White". I know the terminology isn't perfect. Because diluting it on this level would possibly destroy it. Not that you care. You're probably without identity with a people.


This whole diluting of white people thing sickens me. I am half Arab and my white side basically disowned my mother for reproducing with an A-rab. I am a half-breed and the future generation of a muddled brown people. This is straight up supremacist bull shit. I identify as white but I also identify with people that have blue eyes. Maybe I don't have a people, but maybe we'd all be better off if we moved past skin pigmentation.
 
Do you think that there is more trust or less trust in societies that are really ethnically diverse?
 
Last edited:
have you ever lived in europe or spent a lot of time here?

Lived for an extended period of time, as in had my own place, a job, etc., no, spent significant time, yes, have pretty extensive collegiate and post-collegiate education in European history and politics, yes. Have a diametrically opposed ideology and historiography to your own, definitely. Ignorant on the subject, not to toot my own horn, no way.

this european identity evolved with the european union and is about freedom to move, speak and think. and true european spirit isn't about excluding people (but as you can see, the EU commission is on a good way to fuck that up right now).

before the EU, there wasn't such a thing as a european identity ... before this european movement (which began after WWII), we had one war after another and nations despised each other (much more than nowadays).

Ahistorical nonsense. Look beyond the last century. The European identity evolved with about a thousand years plus before the E.U., the Church, the Crusades, and so forth, yes there was intra-European warfare but there was still a concept of Christendom, which degenerated when the various schisms in the Church, culminating in the Protestant Reformation, damaged the European identity. This lead to an avalanche setting off the the rise of organic nationalism in the 18th centuries further fractured things and in turn lead to the series of wars which culminated in the World Wars of the 20th century, which lead to the modern "European project," a radical reaction to the unfortunate events of the 20th century, which is proving itself to be foul tree bearing rotten fruit, and which is what a poster above described as the "demographic suicide" of Europe. The nationalist reaction is already coming and the old guard leftists are dying out. There is a lot of potential for change in this century, thank God, hopefully it comes soon enough before we find ourselves with literal barbarians at the gates in a modern day Tours or Lepanto.

... and this identity has nothing to do with christianity, which will become more and more unimportant (thankfully) ...

And you have the gall to accuse others of prejudice?

and to be honest, those who are against immigration and for closed borders are nationalists and right-wing bastards, who want less EU. only if the EU manages to deal with this mass immigration from the middle east (and africa) in a reasonable and humane way, europe will thrive. if we decide to be selfish and close the borders even more, everything "Europe" and the EU stands for is at stake.

I'm absolutely a right-wing bastard, if you want to call me that, and if I were a European, I would probably be considered a nationalist, well, perhaps not in the traditional sense, but an identitarian, but in the way I see things American nationalism is a contradiction as America is not really a "nation" in the classical nationalist sense. And I want less EU, although I don't have skin in the game in the sense that I live there, I still feel a tremendous cultural affinity for the land of my ancestors, and it breaks my heart to see it's integrity threatened. The primary reason I want to see less EU is because the EU tends to push a leftist and frankly totalitarian agenda. I would like to see some sort of pan-European nationalist project that still allowed some national autonomy but still worked together in the common interests of the European people.

You don't believe in national or European identity, myself and the other posters disagreeing with you do, that's the crux of it, and I doubt we'll convince one another.
 
Last edited:
Ahistorical nonsense. Look beyond the last century. The European identity evolved with about a thousand years plus before the E.U., the Church, the Crusades, and so forth, yes there was intra-European warfare but there was still a concept of Christendom,
yet this concept didn't prevent Europeans from starting wars against each other on a regular basis. not to mention the crimes commited in the name of church. I still fail to see the European identity before installment of the EU as a project of peace and economical wealth. Europe was packed with some huge nations who always longed for domination and power (Austria-Hungary, France, Germany, Italy, England...). you had the 30 year war, napoleon, etc. where is this European identity you talk about rooted in Christendom? because even with the same religion, nationalism and war was abundant. I like this new, modern, secular approach to Europe much better to be honest.
And you have the gall to accuse others of prejudice?
what I know about history tells me that organized religion should not have a place in politics. the fact that the catholic church has massive tax benefits here in Austria makes me cringe. I am not against religion, but I am against people using religion to manipulate people and making politics.

ps Europe has always been multi-cultural. what exactly is being threatened?

You don't believe in national or European identity, myself and the other posters disagreeing with you do, that's the crux of it, and I doubt we'll convince one another.
that's right, because I believe that a "Nation" is a concept which only seperates people from each other. a border is a concept, not a real thing. and I hope that there will be a time when borders become obsolete.
 
yet this concept didn't prevent Europeans from starting wars against each other on a regular basis. not to mention the crimes commited in the name of church. I still fail to see the European identity before installment of the EU as a project of peace and economical wealth. Europe was packed with some huge nations who always longed for domination and power (Austria-Hungary, France, Germany, Italy, England...). you had the 30 year war, napoleon, etc. where is this European identity you talk about rooted in Christendom? because even with the same religion, nationalism and war was abundant. I like this new, modern, secular approach to Europe much better to be honest.

I think we're talking at cross purposes here. Crimes committed by the church have no bearing. Nothing about having a European identity (Christendom) precludes intra-European conflict, mostly over land or economics, in the case of the 30 years war, religion but also of course the usual land and economics. Humans are warlike creatures, and fratricidal wars have been going on since time immemorial. You seem to equate "European identity" with utopian ideals. I don't. I'm just speaking of cultural fundamentals that are shared.

what I know about history tells me that organized religion should not have a place in politics. the fact that the catholic church has massive tax benefits here in Austria makes me cringe. I am not against religion, but I am against people using religion to manipulate people and making politics.

ps Europe has always been multi-cultural. what exactly is being threatened?

Above I said cultural fundamentals. Europe has always been "multicutural" as in the differences between Britons, Italians, Hungarians, etc., which are pretty significant, pale in comparison to the differences between Africans and Middle Easterners. And yes, Islamic history in Spain, Turkey, etc. has been a part of European history and had a lasting impact, but it has nothing in comparison to a mass influx of radically culturally alien displaced persons. And wars were fought at these intersections of Christendom and Islam. When I speak of a European identity I mean this in a larger sense than just geography, but shared fundamental cultures, values, history, this even including the history of wars. All of these things define a culture. When we invite others who do not share this culture en masse, we destabilize that culture. I believe that culture is worth preserving, you seem not to. Colonial and postcolonial European intervention in other parts of the world damaged those cultures, which is some sort of irony as now refugees from conflicts that are to some extent rooted in this damage now threaten European culture. But a sense of guilt does not obligate us (I include the U.S.) to open our borders and fundamentally change our demographic makeup and hence our cultural heritage.

that's right, because I believe that a "Nation" is a concept which only seperates people from each other. a border is a concept, not a real thing. and I hope that there will be a time when borders become obsolete.

People are separate from one another. This is a natural thing.

This is naive and idealistic. Borders becoming obsolete would cause absolute chaos because of cultural and economic differences between countries, unless you're talking about some kind of totalitarian, socialistic world government, which is a nightmare.

And again, I've asked this several times, never to a real answer, why is it only Europe and the U.S. who are asked to open their borders? Why is Japan, for instance, allowed to maintain a monocultural identity?
 
idealism. without a lot of base.

Europe has always been multicultural. I'm multicultural. But this is potentially very different. Pardon me, but how are all of these refugees of multiple ethnicities pouring into Europe going to help the indigenous population? Will they carry it's culture? Not that I want to preserve everything, or that I identify with everything. But I doubt these things. I doubt continued mass immigration is good for Indigenous Europe, on this scale. I doubt they will give a shit about the local culture/customs, a lot of them. Are the no-go zones of Sweden good things? People tend to use the now as an indicator of what will be. Right now, these people are minorities. When Islam has majority in places, a civil vote of sorts like the hoax-or-not? petition to ban Oktoberfest in Germany, might bring a lot more votes. Old culture will be destroyed. I don't see why people are even fucking around with Muslims.
Unless they want to be Muslims... Or their lands to be Islamic lands at some point.
 
multicultural in a sense that there has been always migration in Europe. and culture is worth preserving, but culture will always evolve. thinking you can stay at the status quo forever is just naive. I also still don't see how refugees and immigrants destroy "our" culture. please explain it to me.

Colonial and postcolonial European intervention in other parts of the world damaged those cultures, which is some sort of irony as now refugees from conflicts that are to some extent rooted in this damage now threaten European culture. But a sense of guilt does not obligate us (I include the U.S.) to open our borders and fundamentally change our demographic makeup and hence our cultural heritage.
actually I think it does obligate us to take action. the western world has been exploiting the rest of the world for a long time. don't you think there is some sort of responsibility?

and, as a last statement, if you think that believing in peace, humanity, solidarity and such things is naive, okay then. I believe in these things. and I also believe that these ideals will win (allthough I probably won't be witnessing that).
 
This whole diluting of white people thing sickens me. I am half Arab and my white side basically disowned my mother for reproducing with an A-rab. I am a half-breed and the future generation of a muddled brown people. This is straight up supremacist bull shit. I identify as white but I also identify with people that have blue eyes. Maybe I don't have a people, but maybe we'd all be better off if we moved past skin pigmentation.

Has nothing to do with skin pigmentation and everything to do with cultural and other differences between groups. "It's only skin deep/about color" is a superficial, thought-terminating cliché of a way to dismiss these very real differences.

Do you think that there is more trust or less trust in societies that are really ethnically diverse?

Beyond a doubt.
 
Top