Nowhere to go? How about one way tickets to Saudi Arabia or Turkey, they are wealthy countries that can accomodate their lifestyle better than Vienna.
Hopefully others thinking of coming to Europe see this and think of other potential destinations.
Daily Mail.
Hahaha![]()
No, the second article link didnt work for me.
The first one was pure cynical welfare-bashing cynicism from the sort of creeps that make a career out of peddling such trash.
Bash the source? You bet. It's crap.
If you want to talk about unfair, have a look at australia's barbaric treatment of refugees - it is an international disgrace, but presumably more to your liking - rape, torture, gagging of press freedom.Exposing a scheme where housing benefit claimaints sublet propertoes for upwards of $4,000 a week is "welfare bashing"?
Or is it a bit unfair for these "asylum seekers" to make 4 times the UK average salary while not gaving to do a single minute of work ?
If you want to talk about unfair, have a look at australia's barbaric treatment of refugees - it is an international disgrace, but presumably more to your liking - rape, torture, gagging of press freedom.
Consider the horror from which these people are fleeing.
Or the roor cause of the circumstances that led to them leaving their homelands (such as...the US/UK led invasion of Iraq). You think the UK doesnt have some responsibility to help these people?
You only need to glance over the article you've posted to see that you're picking a fight with pregant women.
How dignified of you.
The Kurds were attacked with chemical weapons by Saddam when Iraq were still supported by the US during the Iraq-Iran war.
The instability in the region is without question caused by the 2003 invasion; as is the rise of ISIS.
Britain is a signatory to various international treaties on stateless people seeking asylum.
I cant be bothered elaborating any further on your reactionary baiting. Take it to Stormfront.
Note the massive distinction between "migrants" and "asylum seekers".
Read the OP - this thread is about 71 innocent people suffocating to death.
Your whining is noted, but getting a fucking grip pal.
Another decade another culture forced into living as refugees for the "locals" to fear monger against.
The irony is today's refugee legislation exists because there was a need to deal with the millions forced out of Europe following WW2. Back then it were the Germans, Italians, Greeks and even British subjects who were encouraged to transverse the globe, settling in far removed lands with differing cultures. The "Wogs" were accused of all being criminals, their food stank and they didn't want to play the same sports as the locals. However within a generation these immigrant kids were absorbed into the nation, while their strang foods and customs were eventually accepted as something exotic and exciting, rather than something distasteful. Come the 70's the mantle was passed onto the poor Vietnamese families, fleeing wars for a life with no guarantees other than less of a threat of being shot. Today there wouldn't be a community who doesn't have at least one Nguyen family who support the local football team and employ other locals in hard working businesses.
To fear a sudden influx of now Arab refugees is silly. They will eventually assimilate into your community no less than any other culture over the past 100 years. Wars create enemies, but time eventually removes entrenched xenophobia. In 20 years time Mohammed will run the best Persian restaurant in the city, while is son will star for the local team. They may still worship a different God but history shows us they are more likely to be converted to the local culture than they are of changing it adversely.
This is spoken by a migrant.
Can't think of a single 7/7, Madrid bombing, Charlie Hebdo style attack from any Europeans following the war. We are given the justification of these attacks because "we" went to war with afghanistan and iraq. You would think at least one japenese, german or italian immigrant would be pissed their family or friends were killed by allied forces and do terror attack in usa or britain but it never seemed to happen. The situations are vastly different.
What about every single attack during the war? Just because you want the battle field to be on another continent doesn't mean your enemies will not choose to attack you back.
Call me naive but Isis with all those millions of dollars generated by oil and criminal means could surely afford a plane ticket for a foot soldier rather than force them onto a leaking boat with no guarantee of survival
If you can't think of any reasons why stateless individuals wouldn't have "travel documents", you're not trying very hard.