atrollappears
Bluelighter
Hey, I was wondering if anyone with a better knowledge of neurochemistry than me has looked into, or at least thought about, the likelihood that 4-FA causes damage to dopaminergic cells in the striatum similarly to (meth)amphetamine. We know 4-FA does not deplete serotonin, but what does that say about it's likelihood to deplete dopamine? And if it is likely to do so, then to what extent?
Thus far, I've been inclined to think that it would be relatively safe also in this respect. I figure that as it doesn't seem to be oxidized with para-hydroxylation, and so does not form metabolites that are responsible for 5-HT toxicity, the absence of that initial step likely blocks the formation of oxidative byproducts that may account for DA toxicity in other amphetamines. But, is the formation of such metabolites a necessary step in DA toxicity? If so, is para-hydroxylation a necessary step in the formation of such metabolites?
Just think, if it doesn't display monoaminergic neurotoxicity (or 5-HT2B agonism) then it could be used as a "safer" amphetamine, probably substituting adequately for most of amphetamine's therapeutic and recreational uses.
Thus far, I've been inclined to think that it would be relatively safe also in this respect. I figure that as it doesn't seem to be oxidized with para-hydroxylation, and so does not form metabolites that are responsible for 5-HT toxicity, the absence of that initial step likely blocks the formation of oxidative byproducts that may account for DA toxicity in other amphetamines. But, is the formation of such metabolites a necessary step in DA toxicity? If so, is para-hydroxylation a necessary step in the formation of such metabolites?
Just think, if it doesn't display monoaminergic neurotoxicity (or 5-HT2B agonism) then it could be used as a "safer" amphetamine, probably substituting adequately for most of amphetamine's therapeutic and recreational uses.
