N&PD Moderators: Skorpio
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.4'-Chlorodeschloroalprazolam,
pcplease
Bluelighter
it is apparently available somewhere, and by a search has appeared a few years ago. if good, I figure would've become popular. I would be hesitant to try because of 4'-Chlorodiazepam and Diclazepam; drastically different safety profiles.Deleted member 81238
Bluelighter
izo
Bluelighter
4DQSAR
Bluelighter
But without an 8 substituent, central activity would be a surprise. Unless the image mistakenly lacks an 8 substitient. Otherwise I would expect peroperal activity to be all it is - but I'm quite happy to be proven wrong.
TPSO agonists tend to be anxiolytic as they mobilize cholesterol transport into the mitochondria, and promote the synthesis of GABAergic neurosteroids like allopregnanolone.
But without an 8 substituent, central activity would be a surprise. Unless the image mistakenly lacks an 8 substitient. Otherwise I would expect peroperal activity to be all it is - but I'm quite happy to be proven wrong.
4DQSAR
Bluelighter
Ah - so someone may have come across a paper showing the compound to demonstrate anxiolytic properties in animal models? That would make some sort of sense.
But kinds of worrying that vendors don't understand their products. I mentioned elsewhere that a few rip-off sites were offering opioids with apparently crazy potencies. Yeah, turns out they are duel-target ligands. Some MOP/KOP, some MOP/NOP. I didn't detail specific compounds but the papers are there if you want them.
I don’t have access (via scihub) but here is one that touches on how TSPO leads to the production of neurosteroids.
But kinds of worrying that vendors don't understand their products. I mentioned elsewhere that a few rip-off sites were offering opioids with apparently crazy potencies. Yeah, turns out they are duel-target ligands. Some MOP/KOP, some MOP/NOP. I didn't detail specific compounds but the papers are there if you want them.
Anecdotally, I am familiar with the cholesterol transport enzyme STAR protein, and how its (activating) phosphorylation leads to cholesterol import to the mitochondria and increases in corticosteroid biosynthesis.
I meant to include the link. Being absentminded I guess.
Translocator Protein Ligands as Promising Therapeutic Tools for Anxiety Disorders
4DQSAR
Bluelighter
Translocator Protein Ligands as Promising Therapeutic Tools for Anxiety Disorders
Weird, the scihub.se mirror did me wrong on that one.
Thanks!4DQSAR
Bluelighter
Thanks!
Wrong DOI so found by title.
Ah, good work. That paper references a review on a key point and I haven’t yet tried to dig into it for the primary source, I really hope it’s not some futile citogenesis cycle.4DQSAR
Bluelighter
Even something as common as oxycodone has gone from people saying that the oxymorphone metabolite isn't significant to some peopl;e suggesting it's responsible for the majority of the analgesic activity. I tested the theory with an inhibitor and for me at least, it seems the oxymorphine is significant.pcplease
Bluelighter
the person who asked originally said "it will test as alprazolam but the chlorine is on the other ring". which confused me as to how that would test as alprazolam so I told him to ask about CAS number, full chemical name , and to clarify "so a non-thieno deschloroClotizolam" to which the source apparently said no, and provided 4-chlorodeschloroalp name and CAS.
But without an 8 substituent, central activity would be a surprise. Unless the image mistakenly lacks an 8 substitient. Otherwise I would expect peroperal activity to be all it is - but I'm quite happy to be proven wrong.
i assume the main purpose of this is just to test as alprazolam if sent to a lab, and rip off potential bulk buyers, and CNS activity is not a concern at all4DQSAR
Bluelighter
i assume the main purpose of this is just to test as alprazolam if sent to a lab, and rip off potential bulk buyers, and CNS activity is not a concern at all
Yeah - presumtive testing likely wouldn't catch it. In fact, I'm not sure if GC-MS would catch it but NMR WOULD. That is why I always insisted on the extra cost of having both.
I've had shady suppliers offering the positional isomer of K with the -Cl at the para position. Even when I sent the NMR the response was not what I expected. They just offered it at a lower price. Given that nobody knows much about those positional isomers, we said no - but I expect SOMEONE said yes.