I have not tried 4-ho-dmt, its harder to get a hold of than its acetoxy counterpart (obviously), but it seems like the 4-ho-xxx tryptamines (4-subbed psilocin homologues/analogs) are more "in-your-face" whereas, psilacetin seems to be friendly and more inviting and comfortable, but still has most of psilocin's "shattering" effects, but they are def. less harsh IMO. I would guess 4-aco-dmt is better, but again, this is based off things like 4-ho-mipt and other 4-ho derivatives vs 4-aco-dmt. It doesnt have that same "edginess" that miprocin has. What I wonder is: does every acetoxy-substituted psilocin analog (4-ho-dipt, mipt, det, met, etc) vs their aco counterpart essentially have the same feel, but a more "friendly" onset? This has been my observation and I wonder if anyone feels the same way