3-FMC vs 4-FMC

[Xamkou]

3-fluoromethcathinone (once an ingredient in legal high "Charge") vs 4-fluoromethcathinone (Flephedrone)

Which would you say is best for recreational use?

 

[DynoSpec]

this same thread is on this page still.

id imagine its apples and oranges

 

[xtcnation]

one is more toxic than the other, i believe 4-FMC is more toxic than 3-FMC

 

[xtcnation]

and to add to that 4-FMC is more available.....

 

[Cface]

From the little i've read (sorry can't remember sources atm) 4-FMC tends to be somewhat better, but haven't tried either (will be trying 4-FMC soon though).

I'm still wondering if 4-FMC is comparable to cocaine at all.

also the average nasal and oral dosages...

And IMO i don't think it matters, if you're going to do a stim you're pretty well guaranteed to have some kind of toxicity... excluding the special kids like MDAI. Methinks crystal meth is still most destructive to yer noggin'.

 

[TheAzo]

3-FMC is a non-remarkable straight stimulant. It's my understanding that 4-FMC is a bit more recreational (probably because that 4-substituent gives it a touch of serotonergic activity).

Neither of them are anything worth calling home about.


Cface:
No, 4-FMC is not on the level of cocaine.

Crystal meth is the king of stimulants, with a ceiling in the stratosphere, a duration that forces you to redose to meet work obligations the next day, and is generally ridiculously potent. Cathinones get nastier in terms of peripheral sideffects faster if you binge, also. Meth is probably no worse (quite possibly more benign) with equivalent "intensity of use", but it lends itself to much heavier use.

 

[Cface]

Thanks for the answer TheAzo.