• N&PD Moderators: Skorpio

2c i isomers1?

sackynut

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 14, 2009
Messages
376
Location
Southern Mordor
Im just grasping exactly how analogues work and trying to completely grasp isomers and racemic mixtures. Does 2ci or any of the 2c drugs have isomers? I have not heard anything on this subject and would just like to be enlightened! Thanks! -sacky
 
Sackynut should Wiki's definition for the term "isomer".

Are you asking for conformational, constitutional or configurational isomers? These terms sound all quite similar, don't they?


Peace! - Murphy
 
I'm pretty sure he means stereoisomers (dextro/levo, R/S, +/-). If that is the case, then no 2ci has none, like atara said.
 
An enantiomer is a 50/50 mix of R/S stereoisomers at a single carbon. 2ci cannot exist in as an enantiomer.
 
That should say a racemic mixture is a 50/50 mix of enantiomers. 2ci cannot exist as a racemic mixture of enantiomers.
 
Diastereoisomers are not the same thing.

But anyway, the 2c compounds don't seem to have these isomers neither.
 
sorry i took a little road trip for a few days. yeah I guess I meant stereoisomers, R, S etc. I dont quite fully understand the spacial aspects of molecules yet really and Im just finally completely grapsing how two chemicals can be considered analogues. I appreciate the responses thanks.

Do the 2c drugs (besides t-17 and g-5) not have stereoisomers because they cant exist stably, or because its just impossible to flip the molecule? thanks. I tried Wiki-ing isomers (long before I posted this thread) and it made sense but at the same time, the "rules" (if THAT makes sense) of molecular spaciality [haha] I did not understand.

Interesting stuff I love chemistry!
 
Do the 2c drugs (besides t-17 and g-5) not have stereoisomers because they cant exist stably, or because its just impossible to flip the molecule? thanks. I tried Wiki-ing isomers (long before I posted this thread) and it made sense but at the same time, the "rules" (if THAT makes sense) of molecular spaciality [haha] I did not understand.

They don't have stereoisomers because they are symmetrical - ie. there is no chiral center - which is what makes chiral compounds asymmetrical, thus able to exist as two mirror images (stereoisomers.)

When you add the alpha-methyl group, giving a DOx compound, the molecule becomes asymmetric because the alpha-carbon becomes a chiral center. Let's look at the alpha-carbon specifically: in a 2C, it is connected to the amine nitrogen, the beta carbon, and two hydrogens. The two hydrogens being the same, it has a symmetry - even if you swap the hydrogens with each other, the structure stays the same. Now in DOx, one of those hydrogens is replaced with a methyl group. Naturally, you have two distinct places where you can stick that methyl on, therefore, you have two stereoisomers of the same compound.


As for the two 2C-compounds that are chiral: both 2C-T-17 and 2C-G-5 are chiral because their para-substitution (or 3,4-disubstitution in case of G5) contains a chiral center.
 
Top