2c-c vs 25C-NBOMe

[Pars101]

2c-c is meant to be more visual and colorful while the other more dissociative.

 

[IamMe90]

I don't understand the point of this thread. Are you asking a question?

I disagree at any rate, 25c is highly visual and it takes a much higher relative 2cc dose to get to the same point. The visuals are also of a different nature. I don't think 25c is dissociative at all, and haven't heard people say this. Both are pretty clean as far as the body goes.

 

[rocknroll702]

the nbome are analogs of 2c-x family and have little no research/side effects on humans - where as the 2c-x family has been around with positive results for a long time -

 

[Pars101]

Which one is more colourful and fun?

 

[rocknroll702]

well i would recommend the 2c- only because if you dont have a super expensive scale and even if you do weighing out the 25i could be potentially dangerous.. its ridiculous how small the doses are - it would be better to eat some lsd 25 and or 2c- than worry aobut measuring a dose of half a mg or even 1mg.. its insanely stupid to risk that - however if you want to try something so new with little to no research done on it yet thats up to you -- you decide

 

[kah8]

2c-c is my fav 2c-x, is very funny and euphoric, but the body load could be uncomfortable, with 25C i've almost no body load.

 

[ebola?]

It makes little sense to use 2Cxs as jumping off points for comparison with nBOMe-2Cxs; they are fundamentally dissimilar.

ebola

 

[Thorns Have Roses]

Indeed, the 25x-nbomes are comparable to their own as the normal 2c-x are. For example, if you were curious about 4-subbed tryptamine, you would compare it to another 4-subbed tryptamine rather than the simple tryptamine it was based off of, no? Likewise the 3-methoxy arylcyclohexylamines are akin to each other more than their PCx bases. Etc. Etc.

In other words, this thread hasn't a leg to stand on, and I am closing it.

Also, no what should I take threads.