• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

2024 US Presidential Election

There's a huge difference between:

"Let's focus on the more serious issues before we address the smaller ones"

And actively telling someone that a destructive habit is "perfectly okay".

So yes, let's focus on not letting Trump be president again. But also, let's not lie and say bad things about Kamala aren't bad.
The problem with that is that saying bad things about Harris *only* is going to let Trump be President again.
It basically communicates that your preference is Trump if you only mention bad about Harris.
It is an election and a significant amount of Americans are low information voters.
The only proper way to do it before an election would be to give bad comments proportionately to the evil of the candidate. So, a page or two on Trump for every neg on Harris.
 
It's about what we want to focus on.

Thomas Jefferson owned slaves.
Gandhi was racist toward Africans.
Winston Churchill was a drunk.
MLKjr condemned homosexuality.

While all of the above statements are true, they are not the primary things I think of when I think of those guys.
Nor should they be.
 
The quicker we admit the video of Kamala/Hilliary purposely changing their accents is not ok, the quicker we can move past it. Trying to come up with endless non-analogies doesn't help.
 
The quicker we admit the video of Kamala/Hilliary purposely changing their accents is not ok, the quicker we can move past it. Trying to come up with endless non-analogies doesn't help.
I forgot about that. I thought we were speaking in general now. I'm not overly concerned if she did do it purposely.
 
It's just so interesting to me that we criticize the MAGAs for never ever saying anything critical of Trump no matter what, and now you guys are doing basically the exact same thing.
 
It's just so interesting to me that we criticize the MAGAs for never ever saying anything critical of Trump no matter what, and now you guys are doing basically the exact same thing.
I think the big difference would be that it's during an election cycle. I've talked trash about Biden's Israel policy for years. People that protest it now, I remind that Trump would be worse and now is not the time.
 
It's just so interesting to me that we criticize the MAGAs for never ever saying anything critical of Trump no matter what, and now you guys are doing basically the exact same thing.
OK, to be clear it really is a non-issue for me. No, I wouldn't care if a Republican did it either. I seriously doubt that anyone was actually misled and I doubt even more that anyone changed their mind about her even if they were.

Furthermore, the comparison of her changing her accent in a couple of speeches to the long list of crimes that sociopathic retarded clown has committed is preposterous.

If this were a normal election between a generic Republican and a generic Democrat I wouldn't even have commented on it.

But this is not a normal election-- it is monumental and unprecedented in its importance for this nation. And right now the race is an excruciatingly close one. So I feel strongly that now is not the time to nitpick about her speech patterns. Trump routinely spews word salad but that is the least of my concerns about him.

Once Harris is in office, I'll eviscerate the bitch if I think she deserves it. But at the moment I am rejoicing the fact that she even exists.
 
There's already a lot of recent evidence that Silicon Valley is moving rightward, but here's more

 
Isn't the more pertinent question: if there was an easy way to decrease bird fatalities caused by wind turbines, shouldn't we do it?
In the proposed example going after the windmill part of the equation is just poor economic decision making. The cost benefit analysis shows that every dollar spent on cats killing bird outweighs every dollar spent on windmills by a factor of 1000+
 
The quicker we admit the video of Kamala/Hilliary purposely changing their accents is not ok, the quicker we can move past it. Trying to come up with endless non-analogies doesn't help.
This is a really weird distraction from actual issues. Why on earth does this matter so much?

People change the way they talk, we adapt to our environment through imitation. Its a completely normal behavior
 
There's already a lot of recent evidence that Silicon Valley is moving rightward, but here's more


Zuckerberg? Lol. He's supported Trump for years.

Ohio "news"

and news


Now that the mass shootings are on highways instead of in schools, we'll see I guess.

Whatsamatta eatin' pussy?
 
Last edited:
I don’t trust ha (her)
Oh I was just reading some of your guys other posts, that doesn’t mean I trust Trump either lol

But nah, I do not trust this woman, for a number of reasons. Too bad, could have gone with a better contender … way better contender. It’s confusing when I seen some people all fawning all over her?
 
Oh I was just reading some of your guys other posts, that doesn’t mean I trust Trump either lol

But nah, I do not trust this woman, for a number of reasons. Too bad, could have gone with a better contender … way better contender. It’s confusing when I seen some people all fawning all over her?
Since they can't make people like Trump, their only tactic is to make you hate her. They would do that with whoever,
Me? I would love to see Elizabeth Warren as President, but I can imagine what they would do with her as candidate.
 
In the proposed example going after the windmill part of the equation is just poor economic decision making. The cost benefit analysis shows that every dollar spent on cats killing bird outweighs every dollar spent on windmills by a factor of 1000+

It would have been extremely cost efficient to address the less significant issue head on when first presented with it. Then you are freed up and have good moral standing to go after the much bigger issues.

This is a really weird distraction from actual issues. Why on earth does this matter so much?

People change the way they talk, we adapt to our environment through imitation. Its a completely normal behavior

It matters because it is basically lying. Falseness. Manipulation. Whatever you want to call it. Saying it's natural imitation is pure cope and you know it. For the reasons I've already been over.

Being presented with a thing that's clearly wrong-- then spending days and days coming up with bad analogies and rationalizations instead of just saying 'yeah that was stupid, she shouldn't have done it" and moving on -- that's on you guys, not me.
 
It would have been extremely cost efficient to address the less significant issue head on when first presented with it. Then you are freed up and have good moral standing to go after the much bigger issues.



It matters because it is basically lying. Falseness. Manipulation. Whatever you want to call it. Saying it's natural imitation is pure cope and you know it. For the reasons I've already been over.

Being presented with a thing that's clearly wrong-- then spending days and days coming up with bad analogies and rationalizations instead of just saying 'yeah that was stupid, she shouldn't have done it" and moving on -- that's on you guys, not me.
It isn't lying and manipulation because it is a normal human behavior to enhance communication
 
113202156.jpg

trump.jpeg

89460455-13831005-An_AI_generated_image_shows_a_fictitious_Donald_Trump_acting_as_-a-26_1725913854683.jpg


And weird


I like this one.

853343_071515-cc-Trump-Cat.jpg
 
Since they can't make people like Trump, their only tactic is to make you hate her.
lol I don’t hate her, I guess that would make my opinion seem less valid. And no one ‘made me’ not trust her, that was on her … felt that for a while.

Imagine lol “oh my my … my little brain, ‘they’ made me think that since I can’t think for myself” … and for shame right … I’m not doing what I’m supposed to as a woman and a minority :cool:
 
Top