carbonhalo
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2015
- Messages
- 158
I'd hate to alienate my US friends but from several decades of observing the world I gathered the following observations.
Most political systems devolve into a two party race... With the right (conservative) and left (progressive) both descending into polar opposites. Conservatives (by their very name) want things to stay the same and progressives call for adaptation and change. The left want to fix what's broken, the right want to preserve what is working. On the surface both perspectives are valid.
But consider who has the most to gain. The right want to stabilise a vastly complicated and patently inequality laden structure.
Those with the left want a more balanced and fairer system.
Surely the vast majority would lean left unless they already possessed money/power?
Not if those on top can convince enough people that they stand to lose something in the rebalanced system (or the transition to it).
To this end conservatives have always discredited, demonised, deceived and distracted.
The progressives appear to perpetually fight fire with fire, making both views equally disagreeable.
What I find astonishing is when a public figure can make an obviously blatant lie AND THEN BELIEVE IT THEMSELVES.
Politicians on both sides seem equally capable of the lie but, looking at the world today, self-deception seems a predominantly conservative trait. (Along with an inability to generate one's own gnoses.... But let's not go there.)
I don't understand blind faith in any humans ability to determine correctness for someone else.
Consequently I tend to disbelieve ANY politician before dissecting their acquired and innate goals.
If their words in any way attempt to create "us" and "them", I stop listening.
If they want to tear something down without starting something better, I stop listening.
To those voting in the coming US elections I plead,
Don't vote on who...vote on what!
Don't automatically believe what they say...look between the lines and between the sides and from THAT perspective decide who is best suited to represent YOUR interests without disadvantaging as many as possible.
I'll stop with a question.
If there is an American Taliban....who would they vote for?
Most political systems devolve into a two party race... With the right (conservative) and left (progressive) both descending into polar opposites. Conservatives (by their very name) want things to stay the same and progressives call for adaptation and change. The left want to fix what's broken, the right want to preserve what is working. On the surface both perspectives are valid.
But consider who has the most to gain. The right want to stabilise a vastly complicated and patently inequality laden structure.
Those with the left want a more balanced and fairer system.
Surely the vast majority would lean left unless they already possessed money/power?
Not if those on top can convince enough people that they stand to lose something in the rebalanced system (or the transition to it).
To this end conservatives have always discredited, demonised, deceived and distracted.
The progressives appear to perpetually fight fire with fire, making both views equally disagreeable.
What I find astonishing is when a public figure can make an obviously blatant lie AND THEN BELIEVE IT THEMSELVES.
Politicians on both sides seem equally capable of the lie but, looking at the world today, self-deception seems a predominantly conservative trait. (Along with an inability to generate one's own gnoses.... But let's not go there.)
I don't understand blind faith in any humans ability to determine correctness for someone else.
Consequently I tend to disbelieve ANY politician before dissecting their acquired and innate goals.
If their words in any way attempt to create "us" and "them", I stop listening.
If they want to tear something down without starting something better, I stop listening.
To those voting in the coming US elections I plead,
Don't vote on who...vote on what!
Don't automatically believe what they say...look between the lines and between the sides and from THAT perspective decide who is best suited to represent YOUR interests without disadvantaging as many as possible.
I'll stop with a question.
If there is an American Taliban....who would they vote for?