is there still a problem in the middle east?
in 2020 trump put his best man on the job of resolving the middle east conflict - jared kushner. in september that year, kushner claimed the work he was doing was responsible for the "beginning of the end of the Israel-Arab conflict." he went on to say, of the israeli-palestinian conflict that "Those issues aren’t as complicated as people have made them out to be."
so i naturally assumed this was all wrapped up by now...
alasdair
There was peace during that time, then we change to Biden and violence erupts. Coincidence? Or weakness on the world stage?
Obama, then Trump, wanted to pull out of Afghanistan but didn't because of the instability it would create. Biden pulls us out, badly. How has that fared for us since? Weakness on the world stage?
Putin invaded Ukraine under Obama and experienced no repurcussions. During Trump? No trouble out of Russia. Biden? Ukraine fucked again. Coincidence? Or weakness on the world stage?
You have such a hard on against Trump you are singlularly focsued to the exclusion of reality on some things. Bottom line is, the world was safer under Trump. Under Biden we have been fools losing power globally.
and many people who believe they are patriots support the wannabe autocrat responsible.
and they do it because, presumably, they believe he'll make things better for them when he demonstrably only gives a shit about himself.
they should stop to ask themselves why their "billionaire" messiah is in their texts and emails begging them for money.
Very simple question, how are you/we/theworld today vs 3y ago? Which has shown to be the better POTUS (since we seem stuck with these two retreads, but at least that provides some track record on each by which we can compare)?
Globally:
How many wars were we in under each? How many conflicts started up under each?
How much aid are we sending to other countries?
Domestic:
How was inflation running?
Were Americans concerned about the right priorities (cost of groceries, school indoctrination, educational debt, etc)? Somewhat subjective, as everyone has their own priorities, naturally. But for an average Joe or Jane, were they dealing with what was important to them, or having other people put 'other' priorities upon them to try and confront?
Personally (the American individual):
Where was general average Joe or Jane's level of anxiety? Confidence in their future?
Did young people feel they had a future? Or did they feel they'll never own a home, never get out of debt, never get the life they hoped for?
Personally (of the POTUS):
Did they represent the country in a way you felt was strong and positive?
Did they focus on priorities that needed to be addressed?
Bottom line - are you/we better off under one of these guys than the other? There is the personality that can rub soemone the wrong way; but are conditions better, or worse?
For those of you keeping score at home: Ali and I are good friends going way back. Neither of us really takes any of the back and forth as personal, but we do come at things from different perspectives. I appreciate his responses and views, it helps broaden my understanding. I hope I get him to expand his considerations as well. It isn't a mission to win, or convert the other, but more to ensure a variety of perspectives is brought to bear, leaving everyone involved to consider more than they might otherwise have been exposed to.