• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

2024 Paris Summer Olympics

i'm loving it.

i binged on badminton and ping pong yesterday. the level of play is, as i would expect, amazing.

i also watched a load of swimming yesterday - watching marchand crush the 400m im was incredible.

can't wait for track and field to start.

alasdair
 
-=SS=- said:
After that opening ceremony bullshit? Nah.
Click to expand...

Lol are you pissed about the drag queens? Personally i could give 2 fucks about the Olympics but if it makes a few right wingers get triggered then i am all for it. This thread is not fair though they should have put triggered warnings on it for you right wingers. As a mod i may have to report this. Cant have you guys getting all emo can we?

I may have to make a thread in the dive about the drag queens cause my god it sure does upset you lot
 
paranoid android said:
Lol are you pissed about the drag queens? Personally i could give 2 fucks about the Olympics but if it makes a few right wingers get triggered then i am all for it.
Click to expand...
You sound like the British establishment right now. "Anyone who doesn't agree with our ideological direction is right-wing REEEEE".

I wouldn't have watched it anyway. I think the Olympics is ghey, just a bunch of robots, who probably were robbed of what they really wanted to do in life by their parents, competing for peanuts whilst the organizers pocket billions. Couldn't give a fuck about it.

But putting on a tranny show which is going to be seen by children all over the world, yeah I object to that. What the fuck has any of that got to do with sport at all? Nothing. Fire an arrow into a giant cauldron or something. No one wants to see the perverted ideology of some tosser, keep your twisted bullshit to yourself and fuck off.
 
someguyontheinternet said:
Its funny how people who claim not to be right wing somehow have all the right wing talking points and love right wing policy what's up with that 🤔
Click to expand...
Not wanting to have sexual ideology shoved in front of the minds of children is neither left nor right-wing thinking. Political leaning has nothing to do with it, it is a matter of psychological health.

It is the establishment that has deliberately conflated wanting to not degenerate the psychology of children, or psychology generally, with the 'right-wing'. They have done that to obfuscate the fact that they are attempting to confuse and degenerate our psychology, for various reasons.

50 years ago not wanting your children to see explicit content was a psychological/moral issue that concerned the parents, it had absolutely nothing to do with political leaning. As it should be. Politics has absolutely no business being in the business of attempting to manipulate the psychology of people in that way, least of all children. That's not their province.
 
someguyontheinternet said:
As if straight sexual ideology isn't shoved in front of people day in and day out?
Click to expand...
Heterosexuality is the default, it's not an ideology, it doesn't require conceptualization, it is biological reality that the whole of nature demands if life is to be.
someguyontheinternet said:
People dressing in drag is also not sexual, you're the one thinking of it that way
Click to expand...
It is sexual, what are you talking about. Nudity is not a requirement for something being sexual. Wanting to dress and exhibit ones self in the opposite sex clothing clearly has sexual motivation behind it.
 
-=SS=- said:
Heterosexuality is the default, it's not an ideology, it doesn't require conceptualization, it is biological reality that the whole of nature demands if life is to be.

It is sexual, what are you talking about. Nudity is not a requirement for something being sexual. Wanting to dress and exhibit ones self in the opposite sex clothing clearly has sexual motivation behind it.
Click to expand...
Heterosexuality:
This statement assumes that heterosexuality is the "default" sexual orientation. While heterosexuality is statistically more common, it is not accurate to describe it as a universal default. Human sexuality is diverse, and various sexual orientations exist across all cultures and societies.

The concept of a "default" orientation dismisses the validity and existence of other sexual orientations like homosexuality, bisexuality, and asexuality, which are natural variations of human sexuality.

The argument that heterosexuality is a biological reality required by nature for life to continue is based on reproduction. However, sexual orientation and the capacity for reproduction are not the same. Not all heterosexual relationships result in procreation, and many individuals who identify as non-heterosexual can and do contribute to societal continuity in various ways, including through adoption and other means of parenting.

Nature itself shows a diversity of sexual behaviors and orientations among different species, indicating that heteronormativity is not the sole "natural" order.

Claiming that heterosexuality is not an ideology ignores the cultural and societal structures that promote heterosexual norms. Heteronormativity, the assumption that heterosexuality is the default or normal sexual orientation, is indeed an ideological construct that influences laws, policies, media, and social expectations.

The idea that heterosexuality "doesn't require conceptualization" neglects the extensive cultural narratives and institutions that sustain and promote heterosexual norms.

Drag:
Drag is a form of performance art where individuals, often but not exclusively men, dress in exaggerated clothing and makeup typically associated with the opposite gender. The primary motivation for drag is artistic expression, entertainment, and social commentary, rather than sexual arousal or expression.

Drag can be a critique of gender norms and a celebration of gender diversity, and many drag performances focus on humor, satire, and theatricality rather than sexuality.

The statement conflates gender expression with sexual motivation. Dressing in clothing traditionally associated with another gender is not inherently sexual. Gender expression refers to how individuals present themselves and is separate from sexual orientation or motivation.

Many people who participate in drag do not do so out of sexual desire but rather to explore different aspects of identity, challenge societal norms, or engage in creative performance.

Drag encompasses a wide range of expressions and purposes. While some drag performances might incorporate sexual elements, many do not. Assuming that all drag is sexual reduces the complexity of drag culture and ignores the non-sexual motivations behind it.

Drag shows often include themes of empowerment, political activism, and cultural commentary, further demonstrating that the motivation behind drag is multifaceted and not solely or even primarily sexual.
 
someguyontheinternet said:
This statement assumes that heterosexuality is the "default" sexual orientation. While heterosexuality is statistically more common, it is not accurate to describe it as a universal default.
Click to expand...
Nice chatGPT nonsense there pal. I'm not reading the rest of it, and in regards to this opening statement.. lol.. just lol. Heterosexuality is the default. By definition it is. Without it, none of us would be here.
 
someguyontheinternet said:
Frankly the response isn't for you, I know you don't care to read. Its for the people who might come by and think you actually have a point
Click to expand...
I'd read it if I thought you actually wrote it and weren't just copy-pasting from ideologically bent AI models.

It's cute though, that you feel the need to ferociously defend degenerate corporate media, pushing degenerate ideology.. whilst also using psychologically degenerating AI models. And you think you're so smart :rolleyes:
 
if parents don't want their children seeing a flamboyant homosexual or transexual person on the telly, they should not allow their kids to see it. it's called taking responsibility and, while you are definitely not right-wing, right-wingers generally are all about it :)

alasdair
 
alasdairm said:
if parents don't want their children seeing a flamboyant homosexual or transexual person on the telly, they should not allow their kids to see it.
Click to expand...
Or, how about the opening ceremony of a sports event actually have something to do with sports, and not be a completely irrelevant ideological presentation seeking to exploit the fact their would be a guaranteed audience of millions.

They should get their own lame show where they can be as flamboyant as they like, one where people have the option of tuning in as opposed to having this degeneracy sprung on them.
 
lol - you had the option of tuning in to the olympics too.

and how many olympic opening ceremonies have you watched? they're never just about sports.

lots of people did and, apparently, instead of deciding that some of the content wasn't for them and changing the station or turning off, they kept watching so they had something to me outraged by...

alasdair
 
Who said I tuned in? I told you, I couldn't give a toss about the olympics. I saw commentary on it.

Yes, the opening ceremonies have always been a display of batshit mentalism masquerading as art, but this one was egregious. One of the guys had his nutsack out, come on.

Don't tell me you believe they don't know exactly what they were doing. Bunch of damaged people getting off on exhibiting themselves and mocking other peoples beliefs - but whom are unable to take it themselves and hide behind the enforcement of political correctness.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top