• N&PD Moderators: Skorpio

((2-(3,4 dimethylphenyl)-N, i-dimethylethanamine)-2- one)

The nomenclature is all fucked up, but it looks like 3-Methylmephedrone or the N,N-Dimethylated version of that.
 
((2-(3,4 dimethylphenyl)-N, i-dimethylethanamine)-2- one)

methyl groups para and meta on the phenyl ring

methyl group on the amine

methyl group on the i (wtf?)

don't discount this possibility (if i is a typo for N):

imgsrv.fcgi
 
This is labled in the drug called Sub Coca and Neo Doves what is it?

A fake chemical name, made to sound like it could be a chemical name.

I suspect that's the product of the names of 3-5 drugs and copy/paste.

More bullshit branding.

Either that, or a horribly incorrect attempt at naming 3,4-DMMC
 
If the compound is meant to be active at all, "i" means 1; the term is properly written 2-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)-N,1-dimethyl-1-oxo-ethanamine, which is technically valid but frankly totally idiotic, and ought to be written 1-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)-2-methylamino-propanone.
 
If the compound is meant to be active at all, "i" means 1; the term is properly written 2-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)-N,1-dimethyl-1-oxo-ethanamine, which is technically valid but frankly totally idiotic, and ought to be written 1-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)-2-methylamino-propanone.

doesn't "oxo" signify an ether?
 
no. it's older terminology for ketone. a double bonded oxygen could be all sorts of things, including an amide, which isn't a ketone.
 
So in other words there is no recreational value to this chemical? Some loser tried to sell this to me in the form of neodoves which is a legal party pill. Glad I checked it out first, because Itd be equivalent paying 38$ for sawdust stuffed into capsules.
 
I don't think anyone said that. It's active and almost certainly a recreational stimulant. It's just the 3-methyl analogue of mephedrone (3,4,N-trimethylcathinone, or 3,4-dimethyl-methcathinone as it's more common referred to as).

The nomenclature is all fucked up, but it looks like 3-Methylmephedrone or the N,N-Dimethylated version of that.
Well, it's not that horribly screwed up. The "i" is the only real issue, and that's obviously meant to be "1"- using an I to equal one isn't that uncommon, it is the Roman numeral for it after all. I suppose it could possibly be a mistranslation of the alpha character, but that seems much less likely.
 
no. it's older terminology for ketone. a double bonded oxygen could be all sorts of things, including an amide, which isn't a ketone.

Oxo is used for ketones if a higher precedence group is present in the compound, eg 4,4-dimethyl-3-oxo-pentanal.
 
Top