Jabberwocky
Frumious Bandersnatch
There's a SAR for 1-methyl-psilocin that posits functional affinity for 5HT2C over 5HT2A. Psilocin itself is a mixed agonist at ht2a/c. If you're interested in this study search google for 1-methyl-psilocin and you can download it from a UK drug forum.
Agonism at 5HT2A is somehow linked to inhibitory signals to the visual cortex (edge detection, depth perception, etc). This accounts for the visuals experienced under psilocin intoxication.
If 1-methyl-psilocin does not target 5HT2A, would it then not cause visuals of the nature experienced on psilocin? What would the subjective quality of 1-methyl-psilocin be like (or in other words, what would agonism at HT2C be like)?
Does 1-methyl-psilocin have greater advantage over psilocin for use in treatment of headaches, OCD, etc (due to not mediating visual effects)?
I'm interested in these questions...maybe someone can methylate some psilocin and find out what this drug is like?
Agonism at 5HT2A is somehow linked to inhibitory signals to the visual cortex (edge detection, depth perception, etc). This accounts for the visuals experienced under psilocin intoxication.
If 1-methyl-psilocin does not target 5HT2A, would it then not cause visuals of the nature experienced on psilocin? What would the subjective quality of 1-methyl-psilocin be like (or in other words, what would agonism at HT2C be like)?
Does 1-methyl-psilocin have greater advantage over psilocin for use in treatment of headaches, OCD, etc (due to not mediating visual effects)?
I'm interested in these questions...maybe someone can methylate some psilocin and find out what this drug is like?

Maybe some vendor trying to hype ?
) - if so they'd be interesting to try (& legal in the UK