• Psychedelic Drugs Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting RulesBluelight Rules
    PD's Best Threads Index
    Social ThreadSupport Bluelight
    Psychedelic Beginner's FAQ
  • PD Moderators: Esperighanto | JackARoe |

Jwh-122+210

raulb

Greenlighter
Joined
Jun 2, 2011
Messages
18
Do you think JWH-122+210 would be a good mix? Can anyone provide the effects of both of the research/cannabiniod, for example, is one more like a sativa or indica strain, and unique effects. how long they last, I was wondering about this JWH becuz thats all my vendor has from the JWH series :( and AM-2201 but i hate that shit, you need to read my other post about am-2201 to understand why.
 
They are a decent mix. I would say they are both pretty heady with 122 having the most body high out of the two. 210 lasts a long time. 122 is definitely shorter, and is similar to 018. I wouldn't really call them hallucinogens. 210 can be pretty psychedelic, but it doesn't compare to a normal psychedelic.

122 is more of a couch lock imo, but it's also shorter which can be desirable if you have things to do later that don't involve being high. 210 is a little more dynamic imo. A slightly fuller high than 122, although still not as good as cannabis. Mixing them is nice and will give you a mix of effects plus good length from the 210.
 
Last edited:
They are a decent mix. I would say they are both pretty heady with 122 having the most body high out of the two. 210 lasts a long time. 122 is definitely shorter, and is similar to 018. I wouldn't really call them hallucinogens. 210 can be pretty psychedelic, but it doesn't compare to a normal psychedelic.

122 is more of a couch lock imo, but it's also shorter which can be desirable if you have things to do later that don't involve being high. 210 is a little more dynamic imo. A slightly fuller high than 122, although still not as good as cannabis. Mixing them is nice and will give you a mix of effects plus good length from the 210.

Have you personally tried these JWH, or did you just do some research? Im probably not going to combine but make 100gs of herbs mix with 2g of Jwh-122 and JWH-210, so ill need 200G of herbs and 2g of jwh-122 n 210. I can just take puffs from both herbs or combine the druged herbs in bowls or joints.
 
I'm absolutely amazed that you got an answer to such a specific question (and relatively quickly).

Let's see if we can back this up with some scientific data.

JWH-122 : Ki(CB1)=0.69 nM ; Ki(CB2)=1.2 nM
JWH-210 : Ki(CB1)=0.46 nM ; Ki(CB2)=0.69 nM

No sorry, can't really make anything interesting out of this...
 
Last edited:
I'm absolutely amazed that you got an answer to such a specific question (and relatively quickly).

Let's see if we can back this up with some scientific data.

JWH-122 : Ki(CB1)=0.69 nM ; Ki(CB2)=1.2 nM
JWH-210 : Ki(CB1)=0.46 nM ; Ki(CB2)=0.69 nM

No sorry, can't really make anything interesting out of this...

Dude you dont make sense
 
Dude you dont make sense

Just because you're uneducated doesn't mean he doesn't make sense. TBH I don't know why you're on this forum, all you've done is ask for sourcing (which is against the rules) and been rude to two moderators. Dumbass.
 
Just because you're uneducated doesn't mean he doesn't make sense. TBH I don't know why you're on this forum, all you've done is ask for sourcing (which is against the rules) and been rude to two moderators. Dumbass.

*uncalled for rudeness* I apologized to them already, yeah GAFL, no ones what the fuck those numbers mean
 
Last edited by a moderator:
*uncalled for rudeness* I apologized to them already, yeah GAFL, no ones what the fuck those numbers mean

Well I think most people aware of the biological function of cannabinoids and synthetic cannibinoids could infer that CB1 and CB2 are references to cannabinoid recpetors (if I'm correct). But yea the rest of that doesn't help me much. Maybe you shouldve asked for clarification before declaring a MODERATOR didn't make sense lol. Is there really need for that kind of hostility? It's just a message board bud. Relax
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes keep your temper. Maybe I was not being entirely helpful with the numbers, but I looked them up to see if I could say anything understandable and useful about it, after I tried it turned out I couldn't and I let the numbers sit there.

You should still understand that you are asking questions about research chemicals, most of the scarce info there is on them is scientific data. Think about that the next time you expect a sensible answer about an advanced subject.
Otherwise the best thing we may be able to say about these JWH compounds is 'yeah dude it gets you high' or 'yeah it gets you stoned'.
 
Yes keep your temper. Maybe I was not being entirely helpful with the numbers, but I looked them up to see if I could say anything understandable and useful about it, after I tried it turned out I couldn't and I let the numbers sit there.

You should still understand that you are asking questions about research chemicals, most of the scarce info there is on them is scientific data. Think about that the next time you expect a sensible answer about an advanced subject.
Otherwise the best thing we may be able to say about these JWH compounds is 'yeah dude it gets you high' or 'yeah it gets you stoned'.

allright lets stop fighting then its pretty ridicules , damn i keep fighting with other MOD's, i didnt even know you were a MOD
 
next time see
<------------

for the bolded text that says "mod" :P

i'd imagine 122 + 210 would be alright but from what i've heard 210 is pretty damn good on its own
 
next time see
<------------

for the bolded text that says "mod" :P

i'd imagine 122 + 210 would be alright but from what i've heard 210 is pretty damn good on its own

yeah but my vendor seems to be selling JWH-122 a tad more then JWH-210, so i was just wondering if i should just mix both.
 
Some speculation on the theory of mixing such compounds:

It seems to me like there is a minimal structural difference between JWH-122, JWH-210 and JWH-182 being the 4-methylnaphthalene, 4-ethylnaphthalene and 4-propylnaphthalenes respectively.

Meaning they are almost the same but got a 1 carbon, 2 carbon and 3 carbon chain somewhere. Sometimes such a difference can be like night and day but at a lot of other times the change is just subtle.

The difference may be in potency, some of them being slightly stronger/weaker than others, or shorter/longer lasting. But apparently they are classified as analgesic, i.e. painkilling cannabinoids, I have no idea how stoning or psychedelic they would be.

Also no idea what the advantage would be of combining them but generally combinations have a factor of unpredictability that adds up, it can become harder to determine how high the dose has to be relative to each other. On the other hand, these cannabinoids tend to play well with each other, and you just have to find a new sweet spot with a mix. And because they seem to be so alike, the unpredictability risks would likely be just as minimal as the advantage.

There is one general advantage I can think of with synthetic cannabinoids and that is that ones that are quite different from each other can be combined to enrich each other, making it seem more like the broad spectrum palet you get from natural cannabis products.

In conclusion I don't think there is much use to combine them but also not a big risk to be expected. I can imagine how vendors would like to apply mixtures to herbal blends for the aforementioned reason that they can provide a wider array of cannabis-like effects.

That would also depend on whether you want most of all to emulate a generic cannabis high, or isolate a small part of the effects. But again: none of that seems to apply when the synthetics are very similar to begin with.
 
Well Solipsis, I think I remember any major dude talking about 210 specifically being unique its long duration and more "psychedelic" edge to it without the paranoia/anxiogenesis of something like 018... then several others in the thread chimed in saying it most closely resembled the real deal. For the JWH series at least, this length seems pretty unique to me (I think it was something like 4-6 hours vaped?) given that 122 and 250 for instance seem to be gone after an hour tops for me (well, especially 250, don't remember 122 as much because I foumnd it unextraordinary)
 
Top