If you could find one person in the 831 that knows about any RC, you're a champ. Mostly its just weed around here.
I should also note that I haven't binged on this, and my doses haven't exceeded 10 mg at a time or 50 mg total over about 6 hours and at least 4 days between uses. I'm sure I could make it bad by pushing it harder. I do agree that its easy to cross the line from pleasure to pain with pv.
Everyone I know says MDPV is very panicky and not very recreational. Like all the tweeky aspects of meth without the euphoria. But they could be lying to me.
I'm uncomfortable hearing someone say they agree with the DEA about public safety. I'm not sure that public safety is the DEAs true mandate.
I'm being a little selfish, I guess. I wanna keep my drugs. I use as responsibly as a recreational user can. Exhaustive research, start extremely small and work up, I don't sell them or even let them leave the house for that matter, no driving while high...all the stuff that I feel MOST of us do.
I'm not evil. If there is something that is hurting people who aren't abusing it then, by all means, get that shit off the street. I honestly don't wanna see anyone hurt. I'm even rooting for bathsalt to realize he should be a little more informed about what he ingests. But to say the DEA should make more bans because garbage can druggies are abusing whatever drug doesn't sit well.
If they ban RCs altogether I bet bathsalt will find something new to abuse at the pharmacy, hardware store, gas station....then will we call for the government to bring more bans or regulations against gas and spray paint or cough medicine? I hope not.
^ You should really put some more thought into that.
If you agree with banning ANY drug, then you agree that the government should be able to control what we put into our bodies. Thats inherent to agreeing with ANY ban of a substance meant for personal consumption. You can't agree with banning 'just some things', because guess who gets to decide what things those are? not you, its the DEA/government.
The rational standpoint (imo) is to be opposed to ANY and ALL prohibition, and instead support EDUCATION which will minimize the damage caused by reckless abuse of things like 'bath salts'. In fact, if there was no prohibition, there would be no bath salts, only the pure chemicals that come inside them.
Education only helps to a certain extent. From what I've witnessed with many "addicts" rational thinking goes out the window completely once addiction sets in. Most people that use drugs are fully aware of negative health effects substances can potentially have. Addiction will almost always get the best of people. I think the best example is heroin granted I do not know a lot of people by any means that use dope on a regular basis. Almost everyone that I've known that has used heroin has almost lost complete control. I just do not see how legalizing everything would benefit society in general. I enjoy many substances in moderation and I fully support harm reduction. I just do not think that is remotely practical. As far as "bath salts" go it really makes not sense to me within a few mins on google you can many domestic vendors selling relatively "pure" product.
I think the best example is heroin granted I do not know a lot of people by any means that use dope on a regular basis. Almost everyone that I've known that has used heroin has almost lost complete control. I just do not see how legalizing everything would benefit society in general.