• ✍️ WORDS ✍️

    Welcome Guest!

  • Words Moderators: Shambles

The meaning of life: A short story

dilated_pupils

Bluelighter
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
3,617
Location
Philly burbs, PA
(apologies if this has been posted but I believe it should be shared again even if it has been before)

Please read this with an open mind and an open heart :)

You were on your way home when you died.

It was a car accident. Nothing particularly remarkable, but fatal nonetheless. You left behind a wife and two children. It was a painless death. The EMTs tried their best to save you, but to no avail. Your body was so utterly shattered you were better off, trust me.

And that’s when you met me.

“What… what happened?” You asked. “Where am I?”

“You died,” I said, matter-of-factly. No point in mincing words.

“There was a… a truck and it was skidding…”

“Yup,” I said.

“I… I died?”

“Yup. But don’t feel bad about it. Everyone dies,” I said.

You looked around. There was nothingness. Just you and me. “What is this place?” You asked. “Is this the afterlife?”

“More or less,” I said.

“Are you god?” You asked.

“Yup,” I replied. “I’m God.”

“My kids… my wife,” you said.

“What about them?”

“Will they be all right?”

“That’s what I like to see,” I said. “You just died and your main concern is for your family. That’s good stuff right there.”

You looked at me with fascination. To you, I didn’t look like God. I just looked like some man. Or possibly a woman. Some vague authority figure, maybe. More of a grammar school teacher than the almighty.

“Don’t worry,” I said. “They’ll be fine. Your kids will remember you as perfect in every way. They didn’t have time to grow contempt for you. Your wife will cry on the outside, but will be secretly relieved. To be fair, your marriage was falling apart. If it’s any consolation, she’ll feel very guilty for feeling relieved.”

“Oh,” you said. “So what happens now? Do I go to heaven or hell or something?”

“Neither,” I said. “You’ll be reincarnated.”

“Ah,” you said. “So the Hindus were right,”

“All religions are right in their own way,” I said. “Walk with me.”

You followed along as we strode through the void. “Where are we going?”

“Nowhere in particular,” I said. “It’s just nice to walk while we talk.”

“So what’s the point, then?” You asked. “When I get reborn, I’ll just be a blank slate, right? A baby. So all my experiences and everything I did in this life won’t matter.”

“Not so!” I said. “You have within you all the knowledge and experiences of all your past lives. You just don’t remember them right now.”

I stopped walking and took you by the shoulders. “Your soul is more magnificent, beautiful, and gigantic than you can possibly imagine. A human mind can only contain a tiny fraction of what you are. It’s like sticking your finger in a glass of water to see if it’s hot or cold. You put a tiny part of yourself into the vessel, and when you bring it back out, you’ve gained all the experiences it had.

“You’ve been in a human for the last 48 years, so you haven’t stretched out yet and felt the rest of your immense consciousness. If we hung out here for long enough, you’d start remembering everything. But there’s no point to doing that between each life.”

“How many times have I been reincarnated, then?”

“Oh lots. Lots and lots. An in to lots of different lives.” I said. “This time around, you’ll be a Chinese peasant girl in 540 AD.”

“Wait, what?” You stammered. “You’re sending me back in time?”

“Well, I guess technically. Time, as you know it, only exists in your universe. Things are different where I come from.”

“Where you come from?” You said.

“Oh sure,” I explained “I come from somewhere. Somewhere else. And there are others like me. I know you’ll want to know what it’s like there, but honestly you wouldn’t understand.”

“Oh,” you said, a little let down. “But wait. If I get reincarnated to other places in time, I could have interacted with myself at some point.”

“Sure. Happens all the time. And with both lives only aware of their own lifespan you don’t even know it’s happening.”

“So what’s the point of it all?”

“Seriously?” I asked. “Seriously? You’re asking me for the meaning of life? Isn’t that a little stereotypical?”

“Well it’s a reasonable question,” you persisted.

I looked you in the eye. “The meaning of life, the reason I made this whole universe, is for you to mature.”

“You mean mankind? You want us to mature?”

“No, just you. I made this whole universe for you. With each new life you grow and mature and become a larger and greater intellect.”

“Just me? What about everyone else?”

“There is no one else,” I said. “In this universe, there’s just you and me.”

You stared blankly at me. “But all the people on earth…”

“All you. Different incarnations of you.”

“Wait. I’m everyone!?”

“Now you’re getting it,” I said, with a congratulatory slap on the back.

“I’m every human being who ever lived?”

“Or who will ever live, yes.”

“I’m Abraham Lincoln?”

“And you’re John Wilkes Booth, too,” I added.

“I’m Hitler?” You said, appalled.

“And you’re the millions he killed.”

“I’m Jesus?”

“And you’re everyone who followed him.”

You fell silent.

“Every time you victimized someone,” I said, “you were victimizing yourself. Every act of kindness you’ve done, you’ve done to yourself. Every happy and sad moment ever experienced by any human was, or will be, experienced by you.”

You thought for a long time.

“Why?” You asked me. “Why do all this?”

“Because someday, you will become like me. Because that’s what you are. You’re one of my kind. You’re my child.”

“Whoa,” you said, incredulous. “You mean I’m a god?”

“No. Not yet. You’re a fetus. You’re still growing. Once you’ve lived every human life throughout all time, you will have grown enough to be born.”

“So the whole universe,” you said, “it’s just…”

“An egg.” I answered. “Now it’s time for you to move on to your next life.”

And I sent you on your way.


Such a great story, and definitely worth the quick read. I always like sharing this story; always get good comments.

-dp
 
I really enjoyed this dp.

We can leave it in TDS for a little bit perhaps but, ultimately, this belongs in Words or Blogs.

Hope you understand
 
I really enjoyed this dp.

We can leave it in TDS for a little bit perhaps but, ultimately, this belongs in Words or Blogs.

Hope you understand

That's fine with me and I wouldn't ask for more. I just want people here in TDS to get a chance to read this, feel free to move it whenever you wish though.

And I'm glad you liked it :D

-dp
 
yep I really do believe in this! Awesome so everyone and me just needs to practice unconditional acceptance, forgiveness, love, and have a little patients. Don't panic! :)
 
yep I really do believe in this! Awesome so everyone and me just needs to practice unconditional acceptance, forgiveness, love, and have a little patients. Don't panic! :)

So true but unfortunately there is 2 sides to every coin (Yin/Yang) -- and each side has it's own conditions/variables.

I also believe this story except the person who is talking to the man who just died is also the man himself.

So basically...

Everything = Everything

Simplicity at its finest!

-dp
 
I'm sorry, its a nice thought but I think this may reinforce some people's thinking that ending this life will lead to a new beginning. that is not something I agree with.
 
someone else said:
I'm sorry, its a nice thought but I think this may reinforce some people's thinking that ending this life will lead to a new beginning. that is not something I agree with.

Death is a new beginning. You will literally become other things. Re-incarnation of the soul is what is questionable, not re-incarnation of matter. I too have a problem with the re-incarnation of the soul/consciousness. Anything that leads people to believe that their thoughts/they will still exist after they are dead is a problem, and that applies to this just as much as it does the Christian idea of heaven. Although, yes, we are part of a planet, we are as individuals mortal and understanding our own mortality, and our limitations, is part of life. The only way to contribute to the collective unconscious is to reproduce. If you die without having children you are not "transfered" into another body. That is just silly. DNA, on the other hand, does carry an enormous amount of information and it is feasible that it (the information) is updated and passed on generation to generation. That's pretty much evolution.

God said:
Well, I guess technically. Time, as you know it, only exists in your universe. Things are different where I come from.

So time is non-linear for God...

God said:
With each new life you grow and mature and become a larger and greater intellect.

But there is a linear progression of events strikingly similar in nature to the theory of evolution...

God said:
This time around, you’ll be a Chinese peasant girl in 540 AD.

The difference is that this version of evolution happens randomly throughout time. Human consciousness doesn't develop forwards for some reason... to be extra trippy I'd guess... 8)

I'm not getting why this is a great story. I read it with an open mind and an open heart and I thought it was poorly written and inconsistent.

You looked at me with fascination. To you, I didn’t look like God. I just looked like some man. Or possibly a woman. Some vague authority figure, maybe. More of a grammar school teacher than the almighty.

^This is probably the worst section. How fucking vague can you get? I don't know what kind of image other people are getting at this point of the story. He may look like some kind of man or woman. Genius.

Maybe I'm missing something but this story comes across like the sort of thing printed on fliers that Christians hand out, stuff that is just non-denominational enough to not offend anyone. A man dies, he meets God, and God conveniently explains everything to him. The general message is: we are God's children, there is life after death and love thy neighbor. The author does mention Jesus specifically, but don't worry it's just an arbitrary example like Abraham Lincoln.

8)

I'd honestly rather read the bible. At least the stories are well written (comparatively).

The main problem with this story in terms of being a piece of literature is it doesn't know what it is. The narrator is confused. It jumps backwards and forwards between making a general commentary about life after death (the 'you' being universal and pertaining to everyone) to being a specific re-telling of a particular man's life after death (the 'you' pertaining only to him). It should be general/ universal, not specific - particularly because the protagonist is everyone. The vagueness of this (and other) statements would then make sense:

God said:
You looked at me with fascination. To you, I didn’t look like God. I just looked like some man. Or possibly a woman. Some vague authority figure, maybe. More of a grammar school teacher than the almighty.
 
Last edited:
Death is a new beginning. You will literally become other things. :

I guess if you mean the physical body decays after death then yes, you become other things. However I consider that to be an ending rather than a second chance at a better life.

I'm not trying to push my atheistic beliefs on anyone; my objection was that in TDS, where this was first posted, some people are suicidal and I feared that the notion that my kid won't suffer, my spouse will be relieved, and I will immediatly be reincarnated could be comforting enough to rationalize ending their life prematurely
 
^That is perfectly reasonable. We basically agree, I think.

Re: the decay thing, though - there isn't just black and white. People seem to choose complete opposite sides of the argument. Either you go to heaven/ your soul is re-incarnated or you rot in the ground. But there is life after death. There is life everywhere. Your life isn't significant enough to have an end. It is not in itself a complete thing. You are part of something much greater. What continues after you is the next phase in that immense thing. The next phase is the new beginning. You are a small link in a massive chain. So am I. There is no second chance at a better life, but there is more life. To remove yourself from that chain and view yourself as an entirely independent and alone entity is to misunderstand your place in the universe, in my opinion. Everything is constantly dying and being reborn into something else, not literally reborn. It's karmic. I have eaten many animals in my life. One day, animals will eat me. I look forward to that day. Although I will not experience it as I understand experiencing things, I will return to nature. I have killed many things and one day I will die.

Accepting your mortality is not a bad thing, necessarily, although as I said I understand your concerns. What could potentially be mis-interpreted as an invitation to suicide shouldn't be posted in TDS, regardless of (what I'm sure were) the best intentions.
 
I agree that we agree on some level. Certainly life goes on after an individual ceases to be, and certainly my life is not significant in the grand scheme of things.

At one time I thought that my contributions to society were beneficial, but that was a long time ago and whatever those contributions were have been replaced by now.

I'm not sure I completly grasp the link in a chain analogy but within that context is it possible that there is more than one chain, perhaps a chain with a single link?
 
No I don't think you do grasp it. I'm not talking about your contribution to society. I'm talking about your physical contribution to the ever developing universe. Fuck society. One day, millions of years from now, society will be gone and you will still exist in some form, probably scattered across a galaxy. Life has been evolving and improving on itself for eternity. Society has existed for a fraction of that time. You are part of something far greater than society.

Why do you want to be a single link? You can convince yourself you are alone, but really you are related to everyone and everything. Not just people. Everything. Inanimate objects. Animals. Clouds. You cannot exist outside of that reality/environment - you are a product of it, just like a grain of sand on a beach (to be a little corny).
 
I guess on an atomic level my remains will exist for a long long time, just like water can fall to earth, be consumed, be excreted, evaporate, and then fall to earth again.

I don't necessarily want to be a single link, but unlike Jimmy Stewart's character in It's a Wonderful Life, I don't think the world has changed in any meaningful way for my having lived. I was just trying to fit what your were saying into my point of view.
 
Maybe in the end the planet Earth and it's inhabitants will perish - then, would all of our lives be pointless? What about a single cell in your body - or a thousand cells. They are only a small part of you. Are they all meaningless? If you want to assign purpose to people solely in terms of their physical achievements, then you are missing the point. We are the height of evolution. It has taken millions of years for us to exist. Hundreds of millions of years of evolution. Billions, actually. Billions of years from a single celled organism to you. That's what makes you significant. You're at the high end of the chain. Life is beautiful. There is beauty in simple things. Why do you have to make your stamp on the world and be written into history for life to be meaningful? Family is more important than accomplishment for example. I think in the end when you die, you'd probably be more likely to measure yourself on a personal level rather than a professional level. But then I don't know you. George Bailey did realize his life had purpose in the way I've just described. It is indeed a wonderful life. We are not water. We are the height of evolution, four billion years in the making and counting.
 
I liked the start of your criticism TheDeceased. I felt that you made a good point here:

So time is non-linear for God...

But there is a linear progression of events strikingly similar in nature to the theory of evolution...

And here:

TheDeceased said:
The difference is that this version of evolution happens randomly throughout time. Human consciousness doesn't develop forwards for some reason... to be extra trippy I'd guess... 8)

But you began to lose me:

TheDeceased said:
^This is probably the worst section. How fucking vague can you get? I don't know what kind of image other people are getting at this point of the story. He may look like some kind of man or woman. Genius.

"Vague" is hardly the problem. If the story had been more specific it would still be describing a person. The point was quite clearly that 'God looks like you and me'. But you wanted to know what his or her hairstyle was like, right? ;)

TheDeceased said:
A man dies, he meets God, and God conveniently explains everything to him. The general message is: we are God's children, there is life after death and love thy neighbor.

I could break the general message of your critique of the article down to: 'the story is inconsistent and vague'. But then something is lost, isn't it?

TheDeceased said:
The author does mention Jesus specifically, but don't worry it's just an arbitrary example like Abraham Lincoln.

8)

Arbitrary? No. The use of Jesus as one of the examples of reincarnated instances along with other famous figures in the story makes a claim against one of the key beliefs of Christianity. Meaning that your criticism of the article for being "just non-denominational enough not to offend anyone" would be unfounded. People who believe Jesus is the son of God and yadda yadda yadda may not agree with the claim that Jesus was merely another reincarnation of themselves.

TheDeceased said:
The main problem with this story in terms of being a piece of literature is it doesn't know what it is. The narrator is confused. It jumps backwards and forwards between making a general commentary about life after death (the 'you' being universal and pertaining to everyone) to being a specific re-telling of a particular man's life after death (the 'you' pertaining only to him).

It should be general/ universal, not specific - particularly because the protagonist is everyone. The vagueness of this (and other) statements would then make sense:

I disagree. One of the main points of the story, to me, seemed to be the unveiling of the 'meaning of life'. The unveiling of the meaning required a change from specific to general. The story can't just start off saying "everyone is the same person". It has much more impact if it starts off focusing on a single person, and their life, before becoming more general, and referring to everyone's life (which is still, their life, if you paid attention ;).)

Also, your use of the word "vagueness" is a loaded adjective, and hardly a subsitute for a reasoned criticism (you could have said "generality" or "broadness".)
 
I liked the start of your criticism TheDeceased.

Danke schön.

I could break the general message of your critique of the article down to: 'the story is inconsistent and vague'. But then something is lost, isn't it?

I was trying to illustrate a thin and all but unconvincing veil of bullshit. Your breakdown of my general message is incorrect. Despite, or perhaps emphasis on, the fact that the story specifically states in non-denominational standpoint - see: All religions were right, Son. Come with me. Or whatever the fuck... I looked it up:

“All religions are right in their own way,” I said. “Walk with me.”

Arbitrary? No. The use of Jesus as one of the examples of reincarnated instances along with other...

Don't be naive. Although Christians would have trouble equating themselves with Christ, the story is vague enough - and I do mean vague - to warrant suspicion.

I disagree. One of the main points of the story, to me, seemed to be the unveiling of the 'meaning of life'. The unveiling of the meaning required a change from specific to general. The story can't just start off saying "everyone is the same person". It has much more impact if it starts off focusing on a single person, and their life, before becoming more general, and referring to everyone's life

Okay, why did it "require a change to general"? It doesn't coherently shift as a narrative from one section to another. There is no "change to general"; it is ambiguous. The tone is not defined. ie. there is no clear transition from one narrative voice to another.
 
“All religions are right in their own way,” I said. “Walk with me.”

Ah ok. I didn't take much notice of that part when I read the story, but yes, I see now what you were addressing. It just doesn't bother me that much. If anything, I think it just makes it so the message of the story can be received with less hostility.

TheDeceased said:
Don't be naive. Although Christians would have trouble equating themselves with Christ, the story is vague enough - and I do mean vague - to warrant suspicion.

Suspicion of what?

TheDeceased said:
Okay, why did it "require a change to general"? It doesn't coherently shift as a narrative from one section to another. There is no "change to general"; it is ambiguous. The tone is not defined. ie. there is no clear transition from one narrative voice to another.

This is how I see the story: The guy died. He meets God. He starts asking God questions. It makes perfect sense to me that he would want to understand the circumstances of his death, and know whether his wife and kids will be ok. I also don't find it an awkward shift when they start talking about the meaning of life. The meaning of life in the story is to mature while living multiple lives through reincarnation, to then move on to the next stage, which is not expained (and is not supposed to be). Before the meaning of life can be revealed, the concept of reincarnation is first explained to the guy. It seems to progress in a sensible order to me.
 
Thanks for not flaming each other and dissecting each others view points respectfully guys.
As much as you may disagree with each other it's nice to see you challenge each other without name calling.
Apart from the gift of personal insights shared by fellow members whether it be in the form of prose or poetry, it's one of the things I enjoy most about this part of Bluelight. :)
 
^ I enjoy discussion for the sake of discussion. I find it cool that you found some enjoyment in following it. Rock on. :)
 
Top