Agree, if you are looking for a literary stylist who con combine genre and narrative try michael chabons masterly "yiddish policemans union"I recently finished "Less Than Zero" by Brett Easton Ellis.
Bag of shite.
Sorry, but london is such a downer after paris.I'm just over halfway through George Orwell's - "Down and Out in Paris and London". Bloody good read so far!
that looks abit dirty. is it suitable for ladies? isn't he your man wote war and peace?
or maybe one of the h threads
Who art thou? What art thou? Thou dost consider thyself a wise man because thou couldst utter those blasphemous words, while thou art more foolish and artless than a little babe playing with the parts of a cunningly fashioned watch, and because he does not understand its use, dares to say he does not believe in the master who made it.
Recently finished reading a few of Irvine Welsh's new-er books -
Reheated Cabbage - not a bad little collection of stories (I think mostly republished short stories) with an excellent return to "Juice" Terry & Carl Ewart at the end (from Glue) featuring Blacky, the old school headmaster - very amusing..
If You Liked School You'll Love Work - collection of new short stories - some pretty good ones in there - the highlight is the last novella "The Kingdom of Fife" an incredibly witty new character with an amusing catch phrase - some lovely dark wit lies within.
Crime - his new novel - a follow on from Filth - definitely a step away from his other work, this book is more plot driven and based in America. A definite page turner and I think worth reading if you are a fan... not so much of the dark wit and in depth exploration of the main characters though...
So a summary of each for anyone who is interested... now reading Slaughterhouse 5 (Kurt Vonnegut), seems good so far...
Who art thou? What art thou? Thou dost consider thyself a wise man because thou couldst utter those blasphemous words, while thou art more foolish and artless than a little babe playing with the parts of a cunningly fashioned watch, and because he does not understand its use, dares to say he does not believe in the master who made it.
wikipedia said:There are three main arguments against the Watchmaker analogy. The first is that complex artifacts do not, in fact, require a designer, but can and do arise from "mindless" natural processes (as in the "Infinite Monkey Theorem"). The second argument is that the watch is a faulty analogy. The third argument is that the watchmaker is arguably a far more complex organism than the watch, and if complexity proves intelligent design, then the question arises: who designed such a complex designer?
which, without ruining it too much, is about a war over virtual heavens and hells running on sophisticated computer mainframes storing the dead of a multitude of technologically advanced societies, some of which think eternal damnation is a good idea and create virtual hells to punish those of their kind they think deserve it and others who think this the worst kind of torture and so go to war to prevent such attrocities from taking place even though it might not be any of their business.
*May have got the wrong end of the stick here. Perhaps you are an atheist? That would explain why this is your favorite atheism-refuting argument. Thinking about it now, it could well be mine too![]()
If that is your favorite of the atheist refuting arguments, the rest must be truely terrible;*
The watchmaker argument is old, easily refuted and as such has been discredited pretty thoroughly. Whenever it is mentioned in theological debate by deists, they are doing atheists a favour
one of my fave atheist-refuting quotes in it