<pyridinyl_30>
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2007
- Messages
- 404
Caffeine's LD50 in humans must be lower than previously estimated.
I'm not remorseful because he had access to the information that could have saved him. ANYONE has access to the internet in the 2010s, and therefore anyone has access to Bluelight. He lacked the competence to utilize the harm-reduction services available to him, and it ended his life. Even if he didn't have access to any information about the caffeine powder product, he could have done cautious low-dose initial testing.
I'm remorseful when someone is a fully capable and responsible victim of something out of their own control.
The only reason our species even exists is for the cold and hard reality of natural selection. You all should be thankful that Mother Nature didn't have any sympathy for the humans that didn't have the sharpest wit and the quickest reflexes.
By the way, my argument remains for a DMT overdose, irregardless of the higher status it has in my own life. I resent the accusation of being biased toward users of drugs that I personally hold in high regard.
not everyone is at bluelight's intellectual level yet2 spoons full of that and you go down.....no shi
You just know these same users would be saying what a tragedy it was if someone died from overdosing on an illegal drug.
The biases are kind of funny around these parts.
A lot of this is down to the 'Binge Culture' we seem to have in the UK: take as much as you can, whenever you can - whether it be food, money, drugs, alcohol, etc..
I don't like using the term, but it seem more prevalent with the lower-classes. It seems that, as they don't have as much in the way of material goods (or think they don't!) they develop a horde mentality where they take and consume everything they can get their hands on.
Slightly off topic, but there was a piece that links into this in NewScientist a few months ago. It suggests that because of the fact the average life-expectancy is shorter in deprived areas, people from these areas will feel that they have to get everything in life done quicker / faster / earlier. Hence the "I or this food/drug/etc might not be here for much longer, so must have it now!" attitude.
This is scarily close to home for me, I live like a 10 minute drive from forest town. This is prime fucking evidence of the kind of people I have to deal with on a day to day basis. >_<
You have a point, but if anyone took 32 pills in one go, or ingested 32g of amphetamine, I think most people here would have the same reaction.
Similarly, if this dude had taken just 1x, 2x or 4x the normal dose of caffeine, people would be a lot more sympathetic.
and the answer is legalization. if A) labelling on the package includes necessary information to avoid death, like dosing information and LD50 (which most people will probably take a look at) and B) there may be a class/test required to get a license to purchase from the rec drug store (teaching things like what to do in emergency situations, addiction signs); that way anybody doing drugs will either have been tested on this knowledge or, if he wasn't, is at least most likely using with somebody who has... then we'd have a lot less health problemsHow about this: he took £3 worth of a party drug he purchased on the Internet. Given that he might have spent considerably more on other plant fertilizers, water softeners, bath salts etc., he may have thought "I figure 3 quid's worth should be all right." After all, how many people buy an envelope of "bath salts" and do the whole thing in an evening, or even in a go? And while some of them come back with horror stories, not many of them end up vomiting blood.
I agree that the guy made a really stupid mistake - but it was no dumber than the mistakes made by thousands of "legal high" customers every weekend. One might argue that it made even more sense: after all, caffeine has a long history of use and its pharmacology is well understood, which is more than you can say for the contents of many party powders.