• Select Your Topic Then Scroll Down
    Alcohol Bupe Benzos
    Cocaine Heroin Opioids
    RCs Stimulants Misc
    Harm Reduction All Topics Gabapentinoids
    Tired of your habit? Struggling to cope?
    Want to regain control or get sober?
    Visit our Recovery Support Forums

Opioids Experiment Thead - New Formulation Oxycodone Extraction

it said Just Kidding at the end of his post so I think he was just playing around.

So what is the consensus on the microwave/frozen method? Is it worth it, or is it not very effective?

He should have made that more clear, never mind the fact that it isn't much of a joke when so many people are taking this very serious, as well as investing resources and time.

Back to your question, yes it does work but calculations are that you lose just about 15-20% but it is eatable (even melts quickly under tongue) and with effort, snortable (and with an extra few steps it becomes easier to break up, trick is purging more of the wax). I don't recommend it and can not warn people enough against shooting it in this state, unless you don't mind playing Russian roulette, no "Jkbtw".

You would be surprised just how much sh@t is still retained after the microwave, sadly one wonders how many already had strokes after shooting this melted garbage. In the end, they will never release the harm & devastation that this so called "OP abuse solution" caused. I would bet that hundreds have already died or succumbed to permanent harm because of this OP formula.

washratt3 said:
Anyone's thoughts on throwing dry ice into the mix somewhere. Not as a solvent (obviously) but in the multiple freeze thaw cycle theory? The -20c can't possibly be good for those polymers.

Experiments with temps as low as -128. Post more on this later if you like.

washratt3 said:
brush up on ur acronyms bra!! The jkbtw at the end of the post wasn't a signature...thanks for playing though one less thing I have to try.
Like I said, not much of a joke "bra". ICCL to decipher a few meaningless letters, which for the world did appear to be his initials or signature.

When I have time, I will find a copy of cool net acronyms...

jkbtw
 
Last edited:
you folks are crazy......accept that the stuff has changed....file the pills and grind....put in coke and drink -- take all 10 of you 80s at once that way and I PROMISE you you will feel a buzz --- besides,those oxies tasted SO bad. I'm an addict of 30 years -- and for me, this is the best thing that could have happened..... I need to stop taking 800 mg of Oxy as well. Actually, just betwen you and me -- OXY SUX. neverliked it.Now I'm on a pain clnic and get it cheap -- butI still cant stand it.... methadone 250mg a day is my DOC.
 
Funny none the less. You have a good way about you SYSOP, and yes I'm interested in hearing what u have to say about the freeze thaw theories. The lowest I have access to is -70c. Lmk ;)
 
Microwave for 5 min, freeze for 2, grind it with a dremel, microwave it for another 5, then freeze for another 12 min. Works for me, i would recommend eating it but snortin it works as well

put powder on a tinfoil tray, set on top of a hot skillet, or griddle. Watch carefully, it will turn fast. When light golden brown, remove and put in freezer. Works better than microwave, can be alot more consistant, is not tacky at end, and can be ground between fingertips to a fine powder.
 
my method (h202, acetic acid, time, heat)

It requires the pill to be ground into a fine powder, preferably with a metal file. THE PILL CANNOT GET WET WHILE GRINDING. I am basing this off 40mg op that I have been experimenting with.

1. grind pill to powder
2.get container place 4cc's of h2o2(hydrogen peroxide) and 4cc's of white vinegar together, then mix.
3.place op powder into mixture.
4.swirl container containing solution to mix up.
5. leave container for hour it will completely break down. no goo like with the coke method.
6.Once broken down, you are not finish this mixture is not yet ingest-able. the hydrogen peroxide has to be broken down into its baser elements.
7.Heat the solution to 120f-150f or very low on a stove top.
8.As you do this the solution will slowly evaporate which is ideal as to not to destroy the oxycodone. The low heat breaks the bonds of the peroxide by turning it into its two harmless components water and hydrogen.
9.As you heat all of the solution away You will be left with your final product stuck to the bottom of the solution container.

NOTES: the ratio of dis-solvent to op has to be right so the process wont take too long.
Have fun!
 
To Antavio09

You think your method of extraction is much safer for those that would like to be able to iv the new op's?
 
The comments are very true about peudoephdrine being extracted in a very similar method. I remember when back in like 05 or maybe earlier that Suzy pills were changed to where they gelled and turned to a mess when added to water and pulverized. A similar an extraction was performed using an a/b extraction. When I first read about the new ops and their chemical list it made me think about my cousins who used to cook dope. And their problems trying to extract Suzy.
 
Over Thinking Maybe?

If we look at it simply, Pardue concerns are mainly with quick extraction . The stomach has to ba able to break it down or its worthless. How about an overnight soak in an acidic solution duplicating the stomach. Next day all has disolved in solution.....drink and enjoy.
Back when they first came out with Morphine SR everyone went through this. Till someone realized that if you heated that clump of gunk it would sweat. Drawing off this sweat produced a manner of getting the immediate release. This works I am telling you I have done it thousands of times. Has anyone tried this with OPs. Idea being that plastic melts and releases into water then water sweats out and is drawn up. I imagine that oxycodone turns to a gas in the 300-400 range. As long as you dont use a torch it might work.
Last, in my younger days I made a few drugs I am not proud of but there was an extraction method where you shook it in acetone or ether. Then shook it in one part acetone or ether and one part water. When you were done shaking the two would almost immediately separate. Then draw off the water. It would depend greatly on which it was more readily soluble in. Would the oxycodone shift from the acetone to the water. Or visa versa.
I am going to try an overnight soak in a simple acetic acid solution(vinegar) and see what I get.
 
Other concerns

Another thing that worries me about this acetone extraction is number one.....its highly flammable. How long till someone blows themselves up. Two is expediance, one day someone who is into shootin is going to have a manhatten size jones and is going to speed the process and be putting levels of acetone in their veins.
The best answer is to try and get the 15 or 30mg instants and move on. I have seen this many times over the years and many drugs have changed since the 70s. I started using opiates in 1976 and am still doing them today. I was on methadone for awhile and found that although strong it lacks in the beloved euphoria. Plus methadone has some nasty long term affects. One is what I call the methadone moan. I know many guys that have been on this stuff over twenty years and they all developed a sort of groan or moan that they didnt even know they were doing. When I started doing it after seven years I got off it. I like a buzz as much as the next guy but I know that the hey day is over.
I would like to suggest a drug that many have never tried is levodromoran or levos as we used to call them. They come in only 10mg tabs. Its the longest acting naturally derived opiate and is still being manufactured. Providing a buzz that will neatly roll your socks down.
 
Sorry. I don't know why this site infuriates me so. In truth, I don't think I have ever, in 10 years of posting, posted such a mean post. I am generally a very likeable guy. I think I am just out of my element here...that and I didn't even remember posting...4mg alprazalam and too many drinks and a can somehow (still a mystery to me as I am generally a very polite individual). Here's what I did that DID work and then I am leaving.

To the method of choice:

There are others but this one I knew would work right off the bat. I used large amounts of distilled water to overwhelm the gelatin effects. I used a liter of water and simply let the solvent (water) extract for a day (well, day and night...24 hours). Filtered. Made solution ~5% NaOH solution by adding 50 grams of NaOH. Shook the whole solution in a 4 liter separatory funnel with toluene and separated. Kept the toluene/free-base oxycodone solution. Extracted two (2) more times as per industry standard. Pooled the three (3) extracts and washed once with saturated NaCl solution (probably not necessary). Stripped the solvent off under vacuum (you can just evaporate it but striping it off with a vacuum was faster for me). The free-base oxycodone was dissolved in 50ml acetone (I am sure many solvents will work but I used this one because it kept showing up in literature for forming the hydrochloride salt of oxycodone). Generally in this situation I would generate anhydrous (dry) hydrogen chloride gas but opiates have an epoxide ring and acids are good for cleaving this ring so I chose to titrate carefully with 31% hydrochloric acid dripwise until the pH was ~6.5 (error towards greater than 6.5 rather than lower but the solution must only become lower than 7 in pH). Acetone was evaporated off leaving ~760mg of oxycodone hydrochloride from ten (10) 80mg oxycodone 80mg Op tablets.

If you all are looking for a solvent to simply extract by recrystallization (solvent extraction poured through a filter to leave the undissolved material behind in the filter) I'd look into polar aprotic solvents. I have dimethylformamide, tetrahydrofuran, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). I didn't try it in these. I tried a polar protic solvent, methanol, and got poor results. Polyethylene glycol 400 is soluble in alcohols like methanol but residual water content might have caused this as well (most store bought solvents contain way more water than one might imagine). Anyway, if I were to try methanol again it would be dried with magnesium sulfate or calcium chloride first). Anyway, DMSO would be an excellent choice but it has a high boiling point meaning anyone that uses this needs distillation equipment and a vacuum pump. Not ideal for most.

There are pseudoephedrine formulations that have very similar adulterants (PEG 400, hypromellose...many also contain candilla and/or carnuba wax). I only extracted pseudoephedrine from one of these formulations once but the method I used was from pseudoephedrine pills that had ALL the same contaminates in the tablets (they also had PEG 400, methylhydroxy propylcellulose (hypromellose), magnesium sterate and I believe BHT).

1. For 20 tablets containing 120mg of pseudoephedrine hydrochloride was ground in a coffee grinder with added:
- 4 grams dried epsom salts (magnesium sulfate)
- 2 grams NaCl (non-iodized table salt).

2. Then 70ml of isopropyl alcohol were added (it was 91% that was dried with dried epsom salts) and 70ml naptha and the NaCl, MgSO4 (epsom salts), powderized tablets were heated to boil for a few minutes

3. The mixture was filtered while still hot

4. 50ml xylene was added and brought to ~105C to liberate the solution of isopropyl alcohol

5. Once gone it is allowed to cool but not until room temperature and filtered

The naptha and residual xylene were removed by pouring some M.E.K. over the filter containing the pseudoephedrine (acetone might work but I think oxycodone hydrochloride has some solubility in acetone).

6. M.E.K. was evaporated leaving very clean powdery (like powdered sugar) pseudoephedrine hydrochloride.

This worked for pseudoephedrine tablets with all the same adulterants and a few more. It's a good analogy as the same adulterants were used for the exact same purpose. On large scale extractions it'll work exactly the same.

Anyway, it's a little involved but will work.

The acid/base extraction I did with large amounts of water worked even better and for OP tablets but that's a little involved. I am going to leave this site now with an open apology to you all for my behavior and out of shear embarrassment. Good luck.

Moriarty

P.S. A detailed methodology for the extraction came from the rhodium archives and the article was called "Straight to E". I used it with the adaptions some short cuts years ago pretty close to exactly how I said above with excellent results.


Moriarity,

I can certainly understand your frustration..... This thread has gotten so junked up with ignorance, it's not even funny.

Hopefully one of the mods will be willing to "prune" the garbage posts for us, and get things back on topic.

Personally, I'm really in to learning new things, and learning basic chemistry is my new hobby.

Anyways, I hope you change your mind and stick around. I thin k you sold yourself short as far as interest in your posts goes. There's a few of us here that are highly interested in what you have to offer.

Thanks, ~ Oxy
 
I have a problem.....I think this is BS

Ok, first off I dont want to step on any toes. Jaystyle you didnt have a lot to work with but I have a few very basic problems with this acetone extraction. I have worked with acetone for dissolving plastics for years. The plastic disolves in the acetone and cannot be filtered out. If you do not move the oxycodone from the acetone to another fluid such as water then the plastic will just reappear when evaporated. My concerns are also with the amount your experimenting with.
My results using 10- 60mg OP formulation
I milled down the tablets with a pedifile and started soaking in acetone w approximately 1 oz of acetone. Constant agitation for 15 min.Then additional hour soak. I immediately noticed what I have seen with other plastics. If you put your finger in it you could feel the plastic in the acetone. If you draw off this acetone and or pour it off this will simply still be in the acetone. I did a simple test tube shake down with 2 oz water. Then will make sure all acetone is out of fluid and drink it. When I did the shake down I left the gelatinuos mass with it. I seen three layers two distinced and one not so. Gelatin material on top then acetone layer then water. I scraped as much of the gelatin off as I could collecting it on a plate. As the acetone evaporated it got harder and harder. I think this is our beloved plastic. Now I am going to drink half of this water. It seems to have a slippery consistancy. Feels like water mixed with something like corn starch. I think this is some sort of binding material. The plastic I don't think would be so readily soluble in water, maintaining its consistancy even after two hours to see if it would settle out. I also have photos but no URL to post. The gelatin material seem to also have some collections of a buffer material....................now imagine Jeopardy Music........................................Well I ate the same amount of unmolested milligrams yesterday to establish baseline. So on with the results. The remaining liquid like I said had this strange slippery feel, so I heated it.....this is an experiment, isn't it. I kept temp low not to damage the opiate. Right away the remaining gelatin material rose to the top and I collected by skimming. I could smell no acetone. Upon taste the remaining water was very bitter and still a tinge of acetone taste. Consistancy was of plain water. By now this glob of material collected has really solidified. I am concerned about consuming trace amounts of acetone. I have to say that many of the experiments I read about were hipothised and never actually tried. I added a tblsp of sugar to ease the pain of slamming the liquid.
15 mins: no apperant results
30mins: I definetly am starting to feel better, noticing a slight dizzy feeling and wondering about traces of acetone. I keep thinking that if I would have heated the original solution that gelatin material would have probably all rose. I just tasted it and it has no taste at all. Not bitter just no taste. It is about the consistancy of cloudy jello
45mins: definetly feeling the opiate now......feel like cleaning something or building something. Dizzy feeling only a couple minutes. Compared to yesterday, I definetly got more of a oxycodone buzz. Leaving them alone the day before, they trickled into my system so slow, I never really got anything out of it.

Summary:
Gosh guys I really dont think it was worth all the work. I still have this glob of tasteless stuff that I wish I could test. One has to wonder, if any opiate was destroyed in the heating process. Having no bitter taste the gelatin mass you would think is void of oxycodone.
The FDA summary states that some of the time release properties were intact. When just crushing them and eating
The word" some "is the operative word here. My next experiment will be a simple stomach acid duplication. I will let you know how it goes but I'm sorry Jaystyle. I dont think we have found it yet. Id be surprised if I had better than a 50% extraction and if that can be acheived by soaking over night in an acidic solution then I am for that. I would feel much better about consumption too.
 
My Experience...

My DOC is normally roxicodone...but the other day I could not find any so i FINALLY got my hands on the Green 80 OP oxy...I was advised to not wet or crush it..then how the hell am i supposed to do this?...Well the only thing I can say is PED-EGG
1. First I took a razor and scraped off the green coating...more like peeling an apple Time:5-10 mins for 2 pills
2.After all the Green was off I then proceeded to take the pill and grind it against the PED-EGG until I was left with a fine dust..Now it does take some patience and when your "sick" it feels like an eternity!! Time:15-20 mins for 2 pills
3.Normally I prefer to IV...But since i didnt want to risk what I had left after all that hard work!! I decided to snort it....
4.After snorting the pills I found that I was left with Mozzarella Cheese Stick nose...I mean it was gross...But it got the job done!!!
IMO: If you can get the regular OC's...DONT WASTE UR TIME W THE OPANAS!!!
 
From http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Adviso...feSupportDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM187082.pdf

FDA Report on the new time-release formula, I read the 200 page report. Here's what you all need to know. This is an excerpt from the Purdue chemists on quality control- namely how far they had to push the experimentation to make their product fail. Earlier they noted that: Under 10% of the population of drug abusers of oxycontin would experiment with ways to further abuse the drug. This 10% had extremely complex methods- even from a biological standpoint. When increasing the difficulty to defeat the time release, less of this 10% would continue tinkering, as most users wanted the best high, in the lowest time. The figured to make the formula more effective, it simply needed to be HARDER to defeat, thus lowering the amount of people WANTING to defeat it. Keep trying is what they meant.

"But to make it fail, we had to cover environmental things, like high temperature, low temperature, the possibility of freezing, what happens in a microwave, all sorts of things.
We extended the time frame way out beyond 12 hours. Virtually all the experiments went almost to 24 hours or more."
 
What about the same thing that was done for the Opana ER? where soaking it in rubbing alcohol and then filtering with alcohol swab? That worked for the opana ER for iv. and they gelled up really bad.
 
Last edited:
Has anyone plugged the op's?
if so please report on how it compares to eating them.
secondly,
is eating them still the only/best way so far?
 
Re: my method (h202, acetic acid, time, heat)

Swim overheard this very post being discussed on the bus the other day, and thought of sharing the comments on it that swim overheard:
2.get container place 4cc's of h2o2(hydrogen peroxide) and 4cc's of white vinegar together, then mix.
Is swiy talking about pure h2o2? or a solution of h2o2 in water?

5. leave container for hour it will completely break down. no goo like with the coke method.
Won't swiy be starting with goo as soon as swiy mixes the powder with the water in the vinegar and/or the h2o2 solution?

6.Once broken down, you are not finish this mixture is not yet ingest-able. the hydrogen peroxide has to be broken down into its baser elements.
What about getting rid of the acetic acid? That's got to burn the sinuses.

The folks on the bus, not understanding why swiy won't have goo, suggested that swiy might spread the goo evenly on a sheet of Reynolds non-stick aluminum foil (using the non-stick side) and heat it slowly in a warm (not hot) oven until evaporation changes it from being a white goo to being a light brown solid film that can be easily scraped from the non stick surface (self-crumbling as it's scraped off!) with the edge of a credit card .

--------
Seen on an ingredients list in a health food store: "dehydrated organic cane juice". Isn't using that phrase to refer to "raw sugar" a bit like using "dihydrogen oxide" to refer to water?
 
^please for the LOVE OF GOD, don't use SWIM or any derivations of such. It is heavily discouraged here.
 
I have noticed that a number of people have been writing about trying to deal with the PEG 400 and hypromellose (HPMC) ingredients.

I think that this may (or may not, but more likely may) be a red herring.

After all, the old OC tablets had both ingredients, but did not gel up.

A similar argument holds for the hydroxypropyl cellulose that are in 10's and 80's in both formulations

A while back, I posted a side by side comparison table of the ingredients of both formulations. You might find it convenient to print out and keep on your desk. I'd include it here, but this version of the bulletin board software does not support either tables or html. You can find it at: Comparison

Just to show that the PEG 400 and HPMC in the old formula did not cause a problem, here is how (I have heard) one could have gotten a talc free powder from the old OC's:

Definitions:

Inverter microwave: With some microwaves, you do not get true power settings. Instead, for example, 50% power means that the oven alternates being on for 10 seconds with being off for 10 seconds. In such a microwave, you cannot simmer soup. Instead, the soup boils for a few seconds, then does nothing, then boils again, then does nothing, etc.

In an Inverter microwave, power levels are accomplished by turning the oven on and off hundreds of times per second, so it seems like continuous low power. An inverter microwave is essential for this method. "Inverter" is Panasonic's term for this functionality. Other brands that have it may use different terms. I've owned Panasonics that do this, and Sharps that do not, although this does not necessarily mean that no Sharps can do it.

API: "Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient"

Open-Air siphon: A less wasteful and more efficient method than using coffee filters. There is a (perhaps too) detailed writeup on open-air siphons at: open air siphons


Method:

Do not try this without an inverter microwave!

  • powderize 10 80's and place in a medium (1.25" x 3") pill bottle,
  • add 6 ml of water to medium bottle
  • boil briefly at power level 3 in an "inverter" microwave
  • let cool,
  • use an open-air siphon to remove the clear liquid (without the solids) into a new, separate small (3/4" x 3") pill bottle.
  • loosen up the solids in the medium bottle to prepare for going back to step B.
  • goto step B, unless you already have 5 or 6 bottles of clear liquid (each containing less API than the previous one).

    The first two bottles are the strongest, and the remaining ones, when added together, have a little less API than the second.

  • check bottles 1 and 2, if not very clear, use an open-air siphon to purify them.
  • If you needed to purify in the previous step, rinse the siphon string in the liquid from bottles 3, 4, 5... in succession, so you don't waste any API.
  • Set bottles 1 and 2 aside.
  • pour remaining bottles into a large pill bottle, like 5" tall with 2.5" base.
  • boil tall bottle at level 5 in an inverter microwave until there is only about 3 ml left.
  • pour tall bottle into a new small bottle. Call this bottle 3. Use 3 ml of hot water to wash remainder of API from large bottle, and add to the 3ml already in bottle 3. It will look like there are tiny fibers suspended in bottle 3. Stir, and allow to sediment, as it cools.
  • Use open-air siphon to obtain clear liquid from bottle 3.
  • Preheat cookie pan in 250 degree oven. You can use a lower temperature, but not less than 212 degrees, or it will take a long time.
  • Fashion a small flat bottom pan from Reynolds "no-stick" foil. Check that it is watertight.
  • Put foil pan onto cookie pan and add contents of bottles 1 and 2. When it starts to bubble you are almost done. Before it hardens, add contents of bottle 3 on top.

    It should harden evenly and have a clear to slightly golden clear color. It contains lactose as well as the API. Keep watching it, and remove from the oven when the liquid has stopped evaporating. If you let it go too long, the lactose may burn.

  • Let the tray and it's contents cool, peel the contents from the non-stick surface, crush and powder as fine as you choose.

Note 1: The higher the power setting of the microwave, the wider the base of your medium or large bottle needs to be to keep from "erupting". The first time you do this, make sure that your oven is absolutely clean in case you get an eruption and have to salvage API from the microwave walls! It is safest to use the lowest microwave setting that works until you get the hang of it. (although at higher levels, the excipients may melt together better resulting in an easier to siphon (or filter, if you must go that way) quickly liquid.)

Note 2: Some people choose to mix the three bottles together, divide back into three bottles and then evaporate each separately, iso tat they won't worry about making a mistake with one or more of them. If you do this, add some water to the bottles when done, so you can drink any residue.

Note 3: All bottles should be transparent so you can see inside.

Note 4: Some people choose to use plastic trays like the ones that Stoufer's single serving lasagna comes in instead of foil trays, but if you do this, make sure that the plastic won't melt at the temperature you have chosen. Some trays can't be used a second time at the same temperature!

Note 5: Whatever kind of tray you use, use appropriate caution when hendling it while it is hot!
 
Last edited:
^please for the LOVE OF GOD, don't use SWIM or any derivations of such. It is heavily discouraged here.

OD Guidelines*OD Posting Standards*Have Chronic Pain?*Filter Your Shots!

Thanks for the heads up! I looked in the Guidelines and Standards that you referenced and saw no mention of it. Is there somewhere else from where I should have learned that it's use was discouraged before going ahead and using it?
 
I tried sending this as a private message to another poster, but my attempt was rejected with a message saying that I could not do so until reaching bluelighter status.

Hopefully some of the knowledgeable folk on this board can provide some good answers.

I was wondering if you could answer some questions I had about the use of epsom salts to purify ethanol for dealing with PEO .

I came up with the following after looking up the molecular weight of epsom salts before and after hydration, and was wondering what comments anyone might have:

Given that the molecular weight of MgSO4.7H2O is 246.4564 and the molecular weight of 7 H20 molecules is 126.105, if one were to heat 246.4564 grams (8.7 oz) of the heptahydrate at 500F, one would get 120.3514 grams of the sulfate after heating.

If one were then to place the 120.3514 grams of sulfate in 252.210 grams of 100 proof vodka, should doing so result in having the original 246.4564 grams (8.7 oz) of heptahydrate sitting in 126.105 grams of pure ethanol? Or is there something that I'm not taking into account?

How quickly might the anhydrous form grab moisture back from the air?
Must it be used very quickly before it becomes ineffective for drying alcohol?

It would seem obvious that the water and ethanol would have different molecular weights. How might that throw off the above calculations?

One thing worrisome: I saw a suggestion somewhere that Polyox can be chemically bound to opiate salts in a manner such that if one were to dissolve the PolyOx in ethanol, the opiate would come along with it, being both bound to the polyox and insoluble in water until something breaks the bond. In other words, the polyox functions as though it were water to the normally water soluble opiate salt, such that you might have an equivalent of a saturated solution of oxycodone (dissolved in polyox, not water). Before the oxy can dissolve in water, it's bound to the polyox must be broken. Wierd, and a bit scary if true.
 
Last edited:
Top