• N&PD Moderators: Skorpio

(MDMA) Loss of Magic = Loss of Neurons? (or, How to Prevent MDMA Neurotoxicity)

thelearner

Bluelighter
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
Messages
78
So there's always an ongoing debate about MDMA neurotoxicity and whether it actually exists, but there have been SO MANY that show neurotoxicity (at least in rats, mice, and non-human primates) of pure MDMA that in my opinion a user is much better off assuming toxicity and taking the appropriate steps to try and mitigate it.

We still aren't clear on how the brain recovers from neuron loss, and all the data we have so far seems to point to the fact that while neurons can be recovered, the reinnervation pattern isn't the same as before. I don't know about you, but I like my neurons right where they are. :)

In addition, virtually everyone who uses MDMA repeatedly / regularly eventually reports a "loss of magic" -- that the subjective effects of the experience are there, but qualitatively just not quite right. Based on the knowledge that MDMA is neurotoxic, it makes sense that it's the destruction of the very neurons critical to the perception of the "full" MDMA experience that causes the "loss of magic." If this is true, by focusing on preventing neurotoxicity, we could also potentially allow users to keep the magic forever, even when dosing more frequently! What a wonderful scenario that would be!

I've based these guesses on an incredibly comprehensive research paper that discusses how and why MDMA is neurotoxic:

http://www.mediafire.com/?wh43mqqle92vimq

I've been meaning to do a post on a proposed methodolgy for PREVENTING neurotoxicity due to MDMA based on info in that article, so here's a brief summary of how we think neurotoxicity happens in lay terms, then I'll talk about means to prevent neurotoxicity. (This is GROSSLY oversimplified -- correct me as needed).

1. MDMA causes a powerful release of Serotonin (5-HT) and Dopamine (DA) (and norepinephrine and some other stuff, which doesn't appear to play a role in toxicity), leaving 5-HT containing cells "empty."

2. As the body metabolizes MDMA, 5-HT, and DA, toxic metabolites and free radicals are created. In particular, it appears that the metabolism (breakdown) of DA by the enzyme MAO-B is a very important part of neurotoxicity for reasons not well understood.

3. Because serotonin "cells" are "empty," and some of the metabolites and free radicals have an affinity for these areas, they are drawn into these areas and cause damage to mitochondria, DNA, etc. causing cell death, i.e. neurotoxicity.

Other factors:

MDMA raises body temperature. Higher body temp causes a more powerful release of 5-HT and DA and greater production of damaging free radicals.

So, in theory, if we can do the following, we can largely prevent neurotoxicity:

(Please note I am NOT an expert, just relaying what I've learned in lay terms. I may get some terms / specifics wrong. This is very much a work in progress and input, suggestions, changes, etc. from those with a stronger background and understanding than I have are certainly welcome. That said, I think we should try to avoid absolutist comments about MAO inhibition / SSRI use and the like -- it is clear there are some risks, and I think all would be best served by an elucidation of those risks in more detail than suggesting it has no place in the prevention of neurotoxicity.)

Those looking to use this to prevent neurotoxicity -- BE FUCKING CAREFUL AND USE AT YOUR OWN RISK!)

1. Temporarily prevent the breakdown of DA via inhibition of MAO-B using low-dose Deprenyl. As mentioned above, breakdown of DA is an important part of neurotoxicity, and prevention of that breakdown through MAO-B inhibition is highly neuroprotective.

(Would 2.5mg to 5mg 2 hours before MDMA consumption be appropriate dose?). This carries some risk as in high enough doses (multiple doses in week leading up to MDMA use or 15mg+), Deprenyl also inhibits the enzyme MAO-A, which is responsible for the breakdown of 5-HT, leading to a high risk of Serotonin Syndrome.

Because DA breakdown is inhibited, there is also an increased risk of speed psychosis and cardiac events, so MDMA doses should probably start much lower and be more moderate to prevent this (start with 1/2 of usual dose and work up SLOWLY, being SURE to avoid "binging" with a 12+ hour session).

In other words, this strategy balances one risk with another -- reduced risk of neurotoxicity with increased risk of speed psychosis / cardiac events. It is, however, my personal OPINION that if used carefully, this could be the cornerstone of preventing neurotoxicity, at least if studies on rats are accurate (they show up to 85% reduction in 5-HT loss using Deprenyl as described!)

WARNING FOR WOMEN: Deprenyl works synergistically with birth control and is roughly 20-30x more potent when taken by someone on birth control. DO NOT use this method if you are on birth control as MAO-A inhibition is almost guaranteed to happen, putting you at incredibly high risk for Serotonin Syndrome.

2. Prevent free radicals created by MDMA metabolism from doing damage using free radical scavengers. This is already well understood and many are doing it by taking antioxidants, though I would guess in amounts that aren't high enough to provide sufficient protection.

Basically, MDMA causes production of reactive molecules with a negative charge. Since molecules want to be neutral (without a charge), they react with other molecules, often destroying them. Sometimes these molecules are part of DNA, cell membranes, mitochondria, etc. and damage to these things causes cell death. However, if we can give these free radicals something to react with instead of, y'know, our BRAINS, then we can prevent a lot of damage.

Free radical scavengers (aka. antioxidants) which have been scientifically proven to reduce neurotoxicity in rats and should should be consumed with MDMA:
  • Sodium Ascorbate (Vitamin C)
  • N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine
  • Alpha-Lipoic-Acid
  • Acetyl-L-Carnitine
I am honestly unsure of dosages / timing on these because I am unfamiliar with how they are metabolized, how long they last, etc. It IS, however, clear that these should be taken in HIGH doses to be effective and reasonably near to consumption of MDMA. Until someone suggests otherwise, I'd suggest taking 2-3x the suggested dose on the bottle 1-2x during the course of the evening to insure that high levels of antioxidants are available to "gobble up" any roving reactive metabolites that want to get in a fight with one's serotonin neurons.

3. Prevent uptake of MDMA & metabolites into neurons. Basically, there are transporters on the surface of neurons that transport (reuptake) 5-HT into the cells. However, when MDMA is taken, it and its toxic metabolites have an affinity for these transporters and are also taken into the cell. If we can prevent this, we can prevent toxicity. It's well documented that taking an SSRI (fluoxetine aka Prozac) with MDMA prevents serotonergic neurotoxicity (but maybe not to other parts of the brain).

Unfortunately, doing so also blunts or entirely prevents the subjective effects of MDMA (aka ROLLIN' BALLZ, BABY!) So, it's not really an option to take it with the MDMA. However, a couple of studies have shown (at least in rats) that taking it 4-6 hours after MDMA prevents or significantly reduces serotonergic neurotoxicity!

So, my suggestion would be to take a low dose Prozac (10-20mg?) at the end of a roll, keeping in mind one should limit the duration of the "roll" to 6h from start to finish (i.e. taking the pill / MDMA to come down). Be aware that taking a Prozac WILL end one's roll, and I am completely unsure of risks / interactions with the low dose Deprenyl suggested above. If someone smarter than me cares to elaborate, it would be appreciated.

4. Reduce or maintain a lower body temperature. This is a tough one. It's been proven that a higher body temperature causes a more powerful release of 5-HT and DA, therefore delivering a stronger "roll." But it also appears to encourage the production of free radicals discussed above and may affect toxicity in other ways not fully understood. It's also pretty damn impractical to prevent body temp increases when you're dancing like a seizure victim in a throbbing mass of 10,000 of your new best friends to the most ecstatic, phenomenal music you've ever heard -- and you're doing it while being rubbed on by some anonymous hottie.

So, attempting to avoid suggestions that would lessen one's experience, I suggest the following:
  • Avoid caffeine (Coke, energy drinks, etc.). Caffeine is known to encourage increases in body temp and increase neurotoxicity of MDMA. Besides, you're rolling -- you shouldn't need it! If you need something besides water (stay hydrated!) to nourish you, I'd suggest uncaffeinated soda, orange juice, etc.
  • Get naked! :P Seriously, wear as little as possible. Seems simple, but the elimination of clothes will help your sweaty ass cool off faster. Ladies, this means a thong and pasties! ;)
  • Have that sexy guy / girl rub ice on you. Besides, it's orgasmic.
That's all folks. Hope that helps!

In case there are some wondering how to obtain Deprenyl / Prozac without a prescription, well, a Google search will yield dividends. (I can see it now: "Yeah, hey doc, I'm not depressed and I don't have Parkinson's, but love ROLLING MY FUCKING ASS OFF but don't want to damage my brain. Can I get 'script for Deprenyl and Prozac?")

Last, but not least, I'd appreciate a review of the above for safety (any suggestions on dosages, etc. especially) so I can plan accordingly for my next big event. Those in SoCal, see you at Monster Massive. Find me at The Glitch Mob set! YEEEEHAW! ;)
 
Loss of magic has nothing to do with neurotoxiticy but is caused by receptor downregulation.
 
Loss of magic has nothing to do with neurotoxiticy but is caused by receptor downregulation.

While not clinically demonstrated, I'm tempted to agree.

Neurotoxicity is almost by definition irreversible. Loss of magic is more often than not reversible.

Also cocaine is an effective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, arguably easier to get than prozac. Deprenyl is available from at least one RC site (It's known as 'selegiline', fwiw). Kava is a MAO-B inhibitor but also a very powerful sedative.
 
Loss of magic has nothing to do with neurotoxiticy but is caused by receptor downregulation.
As I understand it, this is unproven one way or another. If you have some studies that point to receptor downregulation being the root of Loss of Magic (or seem to), I would really love to read them.

Since many report the return of magic after long breaks from MDMA, this may point to the extended periods of time it takes for regeneration of lost neurons, rather than the (as I understand it) shorter period it takes for receptors to upregulate back to former levels.

In addition, many report the loss of this magic almost regardless of dose. It would stand to reason (I am, of course, oversimplifying things since the brain is an incredibly complex, non-linear system, but in the absence of other info or insight, I have to make guesses) that if it was ONLY downregulation at play, a larger dose would eventually yield the same result as a smaller dose previously did -- but users consistently report otherwise.

Perhaps this is because MDMA causes uneven neuron loss in different areas of the brain, "limiting" the experience qualitatively in some way because the receptors are now gone in an uneven pattern, giving a different "color" to the MDMA experience. To be fair, however, some users have reported success in "returning the magic" with SJW therapy, but I feel like it's such an uncontrolled experiment (varying strength of pills, set, setting, mood, etc.) it's really difficult to give merit to this as "proof" one way or another. I've had sober nights rivaling that of a mild roll. If I was in an amazing mood, really stoked to see my favorite band, it would take only a modest "boost" to give me an epic "roll."

In any case, as far as I'm concerned, preventing neuron loss, regardless of whether or not it's at the root of "Loss of Magic" (LOM) is a worthwhile cause. I say we continue the discussion on whether it's at the root of LOM, but strive to hone and improve a strategy for preventing while we're at it.

atara: Can you help me understand how / why neurotoxicity is irreversible? My understanding is that serotonergic reinnervation does occur, but with a highly irregular pattern. While this isn't exactly "reversal" of damage done, it is some sort of reversion back towards the original state of the brain, no?

As for using cocaine, seems like if the user was also using Deprenyl, the RI of DA would be risky, increasing the likelihood of speed psychosis even more? Also, it's difficult to know purity and manage dosing. With Prozac you can get exact dosing and get a feel for what seems to work / doesn't for you and then repeat that. Very difficult with cocaine.

WRT availability, hope this isn't considered vendor discussion (mods, if it is, please feel free to edit as needed), but a quick Google search yielded a site where I could buy Prozac online for U.S. delivery from Canada, no prescription. Same thing for Deprenyl, only from the UK. Ordered a couple days ago, so who knows if I got scammed, but I get the feeling items ordered will show without issue. Both sites seemed very stand up.

EDIT: Oh, and they threw in a few Cialis free so I won't have speed-dick next time I roll. :D
 
atara: Can you help me understand how / why neurotoxicity is irreversible? My understanding is that serotonergic reinnervation does occur, but with a highly irregular pattern. While this isn't exactly "reversal" of damage done, it is some sort of reversion back towards the original state of the brain, no?

I'm honestly not sure.

http://www.maps.org/news/nicholstestimony.html

There have been many studies of the effects of high doses of MDMA on brain cells in both rats and monkeys. The commission has been told that MDMA kills brain cells. That statement is incorrect. I shall use an analogy between a brain cell and a tree. In this analogy, the roots of the tree correspond to the brain cell itself and the branches of the tree correspond to the fiber connections called axons that go out from the brain cells in various directions. Killing a brain cell would be analogous to killing the roots of the tree, and thus permanently destroying it. What MDMA does is more like trimming back the branches of the tree. In laboratory animals large doses of MDMA are known to cause the degeneration of brain serotonin axons. Depending on the dose of MDMA given, these axons, like the branches of the tree, can resprout and grow back. Animals given large doses of MDMA to produce this effect show behavior that essentially resembles normal untreated rats.

Hence my constant wavering back-and-forth about the whole thing. Neuronal death is irreversible, is what I was getting at. Cells don't come back to life.

Axon degeneration is different from receptor downregulation; it is not equivalent to killing neurons. Taking Nichols at his word, a break is all that should be needed to reverse toxicity.

"Neurotoxicity" in this context is a loaded word. I think it'd be better if we restrict the usage of the word "neurotoxicity" to killing neurons and instead talk about "axon degeneration" with MDMA.
 
Every drug of abuse has tolerance issues, this has nothing to do with neurotoxiticy, besides that have some ppl found succes with st johns worth (wich upregulates several serotonine receptors) to completely bring back the magic to MDMA.

The neurotoxiticy on humans is also minimal, and wont be a concern regarding tolerance.
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;193(4):289-96.
Neurotoxic effects of ecstasy on the thalamus.
de Win MM, Jager G, Booij J, Reneman L, Schilt T, Lavini C, Olabarriaga SD, Ramsey NF, Heeten GJ, van den Brink W.
The most interesting finding is that different imaging techniques all showed a specific effect of ecstasy on the thalamus. Even after adjustment for amphetamine, cocaine, cannabis and other relevant potential confounders, a significant effect of ecstasy, and no effects of any of the other drugs, was found on [123I]β-CIT binding (reduced), fractional anisotropy (reduced) and rrCBV (increased) in the thalamus. As [123I]β-CIT SPECT was previously validated to assess in vivo binding to serotonin transporters, the finding of decreased [123I]β-CIT binding probably reflects lower serotonin transporter densities in ecstasy users. Moreover, the thalamus is a serotonin transporter-rich area and previous studies showed that [123I]β-CIT binding in the thalamus is mainly related to transporter binding, although the thalamus also contains noradrenaline transporters. Diffusion tensor imaging measures diffusional motion of water molecules in the brain which is normally restricted in amplitude and direction by cellular structures such as axons. When axons are damaged, extracellular water content increases and fractional anisotropy decreases. Therefore, it is likely that the observed decreased fractional anisotropy is related to ecstasy-induced axonal injury.
Brain. 2008 Nov;131(Pt 11):2936-45. Epub 2008 Oct 7.
Sustained effects of ecstasy on the human brain: a prospective neuroimaging study in novel users.
de Win MM, Jager G, Booij J, Reneman L, Schilt T, Lavini C, Olabarriaga SD, den Heeten GJ, van den Brink W.
Decreased FA and increased ADC in the thalamus may reflect ecstasy-induced axonal damage, because axonal cell membranes are known to be responsible for most of the restriction of water diffusion and axonal damage lead to decreased FA and increased ADC. This finding of ecstasy-induced brain pathology in the thalamus corroborates findings from previous studies showing decreased thalamic SERT densities in (heavy) ecstasy users, most probably reflecting damage to terminals of serotonergic axons...As the thalamus is important for neurocognitive processes, one can speculate that ecstasy-induced thalamic damage is (partly) responsible for decreased verbal memory performance frequently reported in heavy ecstasy users and recently also shown in the current prospective cohort of low-dose ecstasy users (Schilt et al., 2007).
 
I was completely tolerant to MDMA to the point of only feeling shitty effects of taking 10 pills with 120mg MDMA, lower doses didnt work, higher doses caused paranoia, complete tolerance.

I have yet to try mdma again since then (was back in 2008 ) but i'm very sensitive to MDAI or other serotonine releasers, i feel their full effects, and trust me, if tolerance was toxiticy i would have had dramatic neuron loss and that cant reverse in 2 years.
 
On the subject of SSRIs post roll (T+4-6), would escitalopram (lexapro) work much better than a comparative dose of prozac? Escitalopram has a really high affinity for SERT, so it theory it should work just as good, if not better?

Would serotonin syndrome not be an issue since most of it has been dumped out of the vesicle and destroyed by MAO-A? Basically since MDMA produces an acute tolerence, you still have most of the toxic metabolites in your blood when the subjective effects have ceased. So an SSRI would "override" MDMAs metabolites in SERT since they (SSRIs) have a higher affinity, which should protect against neuron damage?
 
Taking SSRI's for neurotoxiticy is stupid, the longer you wait to take them the less they work, but sooner they will kill your roll yada yada.

There are far better options.
 
Taking SSRI's for neurotoxiticy is stupid, the longer you wait to take them the less they work, but sooner they will kill your roll yada yada.

There are far better options.

Really? That one study showed that prozac was just as effective at T+0 as it was at T+4. Like I said earlier in my post, you don't hit peak plasma concentrations until T+6-8, so SSRIs should still be fairly effective for that time frame.

Better options such as? I know ALCAR and ALA both show that they work well.
 
Really? That one study showed that prozac was just as effective at T+0 as it was at T+4. Like I said earlier in my post, you don't hit peak plasma concentrations until T+6-8, so SSRIs should still be fairly effective for that time frame.

Better options such as? I know ALCAR and ALA both show that they work well.

ALA and alcar look good for that, atleast in rodents its all gueswork wheter they can effectively counteract toxiticy in humans.
 
We also have to keep in mind that some antioxidants or neuroprotectives can exarbuate damage in too high doses like deprenyl (wich increases mortality and reduces the antioxidant enzymes in high doses) and curcumin wich normally acts as an antioxidant but can generate more ros in excess doses.
 
As I understand it, this is unproven one way or another. If you have some studies that point to receptor downregulation being the root of Loss of Magic (or seem to), I would really love to read them.

Since many report the return of magic after long breaks from MDMA, this may point to the extended periods of time it takes for regeneration of lost neurons, rather than the (as I understand it) shorter period it takes for receptors to upregulate back to former levels.

In addition, many report the loss of this magic almost regardless of dose. It would stand to reason (I am, of course, oversimplifying things since the brain is an incredibly complex, non-linear system, but in the absence of other info or insight, I have to make guesses) that if it was ONLY downregulation at play, a larger dose would eventually yield the same result as a smaller dose previously did -- but users consistently report otherwise.

Perhaps this is because MDMA causes uneven neuron loss in different areas of the brain, "limiting" the experience qualitatively in some way because the receptors are now gone in an uneven pattern, giving a different "color" to the MDMA experience. To be fair, however, some users have reported success in "returning the magic" with SJW therapy, but I feel like it's such an uncontrolled experiment (varying strength of pills, set, setting, mood, etc.) it's really difficult to give merit to this as "proof" one way or another. I've had sober nights rivaling that of a mild roll. If I was in an amazing mood, really stoked to see my favorite band, it would take only a modest "boost" to give me an epic "roll."

In any case, as far as I'm concerned, preventing neuron loss, regardless of whether or not it's at the root of "Loss of Magic" (LOM) is a worthwhile cause. I say we continue the discussion on whether it's at the root of LOM, but strive to hone and improve a strategy for preventing while we're at it.

atara: Can you help me understand how / why neurotoxicity is irreversible? My understanding is that serotonergic reinnervation does occur, but with a highly irregular pattern. While this isn't exactly "reversal" of damage done, it is some sort of reversion back towards the original state of the brain, no?

As for using cocaine, seems like if the user was also using Deprenyl, the RI of DA would be risky, increasing the likelihood of speed psychosis even more? Also, it's difficult to know purity and manage dosing. With Prozac you can get exact dosing and get a feel for what seems to work / doesn't for you and then repeat that. Very difficult with cocaine.

WRT availability, hope this isn't considered vendor discussion (mods, if it is, please feel free to edit as needed), but a quick Google search yielded a site where I could buy Prozac online for U.S. delivery from Canada, no prescription. Same thing for Deprenyl, only from the UK. Ordered a couple days ago, so who knows if I got scammed, but I get the feeling items ordered will show without issue. Both sites seemed very stand up.

EDIT: Oh, and they threw in a few Cialis free so I won't have speed-dick next time I roll. :D




I think that your idea of what you wanna get from this thread it's very weird.:\8)

Maybe you should take a big look at Basic Drug Discussion room, or even the papers about MDMA that you can get in both MAPS and Erowid sites.=D

I think you are moving on basic questions (at least at this level, or maybe it's the problem mentioned above: your post it's not too clear on expression, or it's full of mixed ideas :!that make more difficult to keep the track 8oof where you wanna go... dunno:| ) and that you will find more proper answers in that other room: Basic Drug Discussion or digging a bit in Drug Studies or in Drug Culture maybe if having a nice chat is what you are looking for mixed at the same time with some info about drugs.
 
On the subject of SSRIs post roll (T+4-6), would escitalopram (lexapro) work much better than a comparative dose of prozac? Escitalopram has a really high affinity for SERT, so it theory it should work just as good, if not better?
I can't say -- but maybe someone with a neuroscience background could. This would be very interesting to know. I suggested Prozac because it's known to work (at least in rats).
Would serotonin syndrome not be an issue since most of it has been dumped out of the vesicle and destroyed by MAO-A? Basically since MDMA produces an acute tolerence, you still have most of the toxic metabolites in your blood when the subjective effects have ceased. So an SSRI would "override" MDMAs metabolites in SERT since they (SSRIs) have a higher affinity, which should protect against neuron damage?
If I understand correctly, exactly -- because serotonin is mostly broken down at 4-6 hours, we would achieve protective effects from toxic metabolites due to the SSRI's higher affinity for SERT than those metabolites. And without a major risk of SS since it's largely broken down by MAO-A.
 
I think that your idea of what you wanna get from this thread it's very weird.:\8)

Maybe you should take a big look at Basic Drug Discussion room, or even the papers about MDMA that you can get in both MAPS and Erowid sites.=D

I think you are moving on basic questions (at least at this level, or maybe it's the problem mentioned above: your post it's not too clear on expression, or it's full of mixed ideas :!that make more difficult to keep the track 8oof where you wanna go... dunno:| ) and that you will find more proper answers in that other room: Basic Drug Discussion or digging a bit in Drug Studies or in Drug Culture maybe if having a nice chat is what you are looking for mixed at the same time with some info about drugs.
Actually, I feel the topic is quite appropriate right where it is. I think moderators would agree that suggesting the use of drugs that carry the risk of speed psychosis / serotonin syndrome when used in combination with MDMA is beyond the understand of most in the basic drug discussion area and should be kept in an area where it's understood and implied that untested, theoretical concepts which carry risks are being discussed.

As for the "drug culture" bit -- my apologies for having a bit of fun with it. Next time I'll be sure to keep all my attempts at informative / conceptual posts dirt dry with no character or joy to them whatsoever. God forbid we should have fun while we discuss these topics! :p
 
I'm honestly not sure.

http://www.maps.org/news/nicholstestimony.html

Hence my constant wavering back-and-forth about the whole thing. Neuronal death is irreversible, is what I was getting at. Cells don't come back to life.

Axon degeneration is different from receptor downregulation; it is not equivalent to killing neurons. Taking Nichols at his word, a break is all that should be needed to reverse toxicity.

"Neurotoxicity" in this context is a loaded word. I think it'd be better if we restrict the usage of the word "neurotoxicity" to killing neurons and instead talk about "axon degeneration" with MDMA.
Ahhh, this makes a lot more sense and this is a "concept" I hadn't run across. My understanding of brain structure, etc. is somewhat limited, so clearly there are some mistakes in my original post and proposal above. When I have the time, I'll go back and edit it to clarify this difference and make it more clear that we aren't talking about true neurotoxicity, but instead axon loss.

So,perhaps the thread title should read: "Loss of Magic = Loss of Axons?"

STILL, as you mentioned in the other thread about LSD, if receptor downregulation is quickly reversible (i.e. 7 days or less if I understand correctly), then it seems VERY likely that axon loss / degeneration plays at least some role in the development of tolerance / loss of magic. And for reasons beyond wanting to enjoy MDMA to the fullest on the smallest possible dose, the development of axon-protective strategies is sensible to me.

Do you have any more specific papers / info on receptor downregulation / upregulation and how quickly things return to baseline? For example, are you aware of any work by Nichols et. al. showing receptor downregulation due to SSRA's like MDAI and a timeline for their return to baseline? That would be REALLY interesting info since it would give a sense for just how important a role axon degeneration might play in the reduced subjective effects of MDMA.
 
We also have to keep in mind that some antioxidants or neuroprotectives can exarbuate damage in too high doses like deprenyl (wich increases mortality and reduces the antioxidant enzymes in high doses) and curcumin wich normally acts as an antioxidant but can generate more ros in excess doses.
Absolutely. That's why in the post I made I asked that those with a greater understanding make some practical suggestions and point out any issues with the amounts / combinations / etc. I'm not saying what I've posted should be followed to a T. It is a theoretical post with a proposal suggesting several ways to reduce axon degeneration (thanks atara for clarifying!) and it needs fleshing out.
 
What are the thoughts about abstaining for long periods causing a loss of "magic"?
This is the most common approach, but many report it failing to work and resort to things like Saint John's Wort regimens to increase receptor sensitivity.

IF (and this is a big if) LoM is caused by axon degeneration, then abstaining would be giving axons time to regrow and reinnervate the rest of the brain, although maybe in an abnormal pattern. One could argue that perhaps this is why some never "regain the magic" -- the axon loss was dramatic, and the way they grew back was abnormal causing a qualitative change the experience.
 
Top