• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: Tronica

NEWS: SMH - 15/09/10 'Keneally acts on injecting room'

hoptis

Bluelight Crew
Joined
May 1, 2002
Messages
11,081
Location
Melbourne

Keneally acts on injecting room
Sean Nicholls
September 15, 2010

The NSW government plans to make the heroin injecting room in Sydney's Kings Cross a permanent fixture.

After almost 10 years of the medically supervised injecting centre at Kings Cross operating on a trial basis, the state government will move to make it a permanent fixture.

The Premier, Kristina Keneally, and the Deputy Premier and Minister for Health, Carmel Tebbutt, are set to announce the decision this morning, following approval by cabinet yesterday.

Legislation to lift the centre's trial status, to be introduced by Ms Tebbutt, will also ensure continued monitoring of the centre and confirm that it will remain the only injecting centre in NSW.

The establishment of the centre has divided public opinion since it was granted a licence to open as a trial in 2001, following a recommendation of the NSW Drug Summit under the former premier Bob Carr.

Its licence, which must be reconsidered every four years, was due for renewal on October 31 next year, after the state election in March. It has also been subject to repeated statutory reviews by the NSW Department of Health to assess if it is achieving its objectives.

There have been repeated calls from medical experts and its operator, Uniting Care, to make the centre permanent.

Up to the end of April, more than 3500 overdoses had been managed at the centre without a fatality.

In June, the Herald revealed that NSW Health had commissioned an extraordinary review of the operation by the consultants KPMG. It is believed the report was received by Ms Tebbutt this month but is yet to be released.

Ms Keneally said the decision had been taken to provide certainty for the facility. ''The centre has referred thousands of people for help, distributed hundreds of thousands of needles and reduced instances of public injecting,'' she said.

However, Ms Keneally said she recognised there were ''strong views'' about the injecting room and would ensure that the police commissioner and director-general of NSW Health retained their oversight of the centre.

The medical director of the centre, Marianne Jauncey, said the decision recognised its value.

''As a doctor and researcher, the word trial sends the image that we don't know whether or not it's working, when it very clearly is,'' she said. ''Constantly having our ability to open our doors linked to State Parliament means the inevitable politicisation and media focus, which we would welcome an end to.''

Dr Jauncey said the centre catered for about 200 injections a day, which otherwise would take place on the streets.

The founder of Family Drug Support, Tony Trimingham, praised the decision: ''I'm really, really pleased and particularly grateful to the state government for taking what is a brave step,'' he said. ''This is the culmination of a long journey.''

Mr Trimingham's son Damien died in 1997 following an overdose in a Surry Hills lane barely a kilometre from where the centre now operates.

''We would rather there wasn't a need for these places,'' he said. ''But reality says there is.''

The Opposition Leader, Barry O'Farrell, has said any vote on the future of the centre would be a conscience vote. However, he recently told the Herald he wanted to see ''hard data'' that it was helping addicts shake their drug dependency before considering calls to make it permanent.



Sydney Morning Herald

Last month's development
 
Good news, it would of been a shame if they caved to certain pressures and didn't continue with this. The truth is, the results of programs like this speak for themselves and all those who oppose them can really do is hide behind the ridiculous argument that drug use is inherently immoral and that programs like this increase or encourage it.
 
Up to the end of April, more than 3500 overdoses had been managed at the centre without a fatality.

Kind of says it all doesnt it? :\

Although the last tid bit from Barry O'Farrell irks me a little bit.

The center cant really help in terms of dependancy, its just there to give those who could otherwise be ODing alone, away from help, a place to take their gear where they will be looked after if and when required.
 
It's great to see that common sense and factual reality has for once overridden the scaremongering and fear tactics all so common in Australian society. A glimpse of the near future I hope ;)

Barry O'Farrell is an absolute and utter tool. I'd rate a carrott's ramblings over his.
 
:\ no real surprise...

Injecting centre approval fails to quell controversy

Australia is set to have its first drug injecting centre following the announcement that a trial facility in Sydney will be made permanent.

The New South Wales Government has announced plans to make a centre in Kings Cross, which opened in 2001, an official part of the state's health system.

But even after its nine-year trial, the injecting centre remains clouded in controversy, with some applauding its work and others accusing it of doing more harm than good.

Police, politicians, health authorities, local business owners and drug users themselves are among those to have welcomed the Government's decision.

The centre's founding director, Dr Ingrid Van Beek, says she cannot believe the news.

"It's been so long coming that I was almost in a state of suspended disbelief," she said.

"I am very excited and pleased that after all this time, finally this decision has been made."

Others are also in disbelief, but for different reasons.

Drug Free Australia secretary Gary Christian has been evaluating the Kings Cross centre since it opened in May 2001.

Mr Christian, along with his team of researchers, says the centre has no positive effects and that the millions of dollars spent on its development would be better invested in rehab facilities.

He says the centre has failed to achieve its objectives - to save lives, improve public amenity and refer drug users on for treatment.

"It has only saved four lives over the $23 million that has been spent since it opened," he said.

"If that money is put into rehab, getting people off drugs rather than maintaining people in their drug use, that would be more than 3,000 rehab places in New South Wales."

He says while there are less needles on the streets, less people injecting publicly and less overdoses being reported, this is all attributed to a heroin drought in Australia, not the Kings Cross injecting centre.

"There are less needles everywhere in Australia because of the heroin drought, which started six months before the injecting room opened," he said.

"The heroin drought reduced drug deaths in Australia by 70 per cent, so of course there was less heroin being used in Kings Cross, of course there was less public injecting, of course there was less needles on the streets.

"The injecting room doesn't mention this in its evaluations ... it glosses over the heroin drought ... now that's just being deceptive."

Mr Christian says not only is the centre failing to fulfil its purpose, it is perpetuating drug problems in the community.

He says unprecedented amounts of drug users are overdosing in the centre because they see it as a safe haven for them to experiment.

"In 2007 I taped recordings with drug users ... the two users I spoke to were ex-clients in rehab," he said.

"They said, 'we go in there to experiment with higher amounts of heroin, we go in there to get the hit of our life, and we know if something goes wrong and we're going to drop, then staff are going to bring us around'."

Zero-tolerance advocate

But Dr Van Beek says Mr Christian is a "zero-tolerance advocate" who would "rather see people dying in the backstreets because of his fundamentalist views".

She says the centre has successfully managed more than 3,000 overdoses and helped 12,000 drug users while receiving about 200 visits a day.

Dr Van Beek says there are too many faults in Mr Christian's calculations to list.

"Gary has very successfully confused all of the data that has been produced by the country's top researchers in this area, and I have over the years explained each and every one of those allegations that he has put forward, explaining how he has misinterpreted the data," she said.

"While I respect his views, I would hope no right-thinking politician would accept those views and let them inform their decision in this regard. I would find that very scary."

She says she acknowledges the effects of the heroin drought, but insists the injecting centre has still been successful.

Dr Van Beek says the number of ambulance call-outs to overdose deaths in Kings Cross has dropped by 80 per cent since the heroin shortage compared to 45 per cent in the neighbouring suburb of Surry Hills where there is no centre.

"The same drug market supplies Surry Hills as Kings Cross," she said.

"For there to have been so much more of a dramatic reduction in Kings Cross than Surry Hills, there is no other explanation than the injecting centre."

Moreover, she says the centre is saving lives, and that this was her motive for setting it up in the 1990s.

"I worked a lot at St Vincent's [Hospital] during the 1970s and '80s. At the frontline there I saw too many people die," she said.

"I think it was that exposure to what was a growing and significant problem, and yet not being armed with the appropriate services to deal with it, that led to me wanting to fill that gap.

"Before the injecting centre it was not unusual for someone you were working with to die, so our frustration was that we just weren't getting to people soon enough with our drug treatment - dead drug users don't get into rehabilitation.

"As doctors we try to keep people alive regardless of their lifestyle and we just hope that people can be given extra time and be able to address their lifestyles and live a long and more fruitful life."

Dr Van Beek says there is no evidence that drug users abuse the centre as a means of overdosing safely.

'Wake-up call'

Mark is a heroin user who lives in Kings Cross and visits the centre on a regular basis.

He has been injecting almost daily for the past eight years and says some of his friends would still be alive if they had a facility like the one in Kings Cross in their suburb.

"I've had friends die since the centre has been opened. They wouldn't have died if they were in the injecting room," he said.

"I think there is an idea that it [the centre] enables people - lets them overdose, saves them and then lets them go on their merry way - but when you overdose it's a real wake-up call for people.

"It's not a nice feeling and generally it is a time that people can take stock of their lives, and I think if you overdose in a place like that and you live through it there is also an opportunity to talk to someone straight away about what you can do about this."

There are 90 injecting centres around the world.

Dr Van Beek says the New South Wales Government should be proud of its decision to take the lead in Australia.

She says she would support the development of more injecting centres around the country, but that they must be founded from a grassroots level.

"It really has to be a local community decision," she said.

"In areas where you have a high level of street-based injecting, high levels of overdose, HIV, Hep C, amenity problems, I think it should be one of the things that you would consider, but only if it is acceptable to the local community."

But Mr Christian says more injecting centres would be a waste of money.
 

Why the safe injecting room is here to stay
by Carmel Tebbutt
16 Sep 05:55am

I can still remember the hope and optimism of the delegates to the Carr Government’s 1999 Drug Summit.


People with widely divergent views came together to find better ways to deal with drug addiction and the problems it brings. On much there was agreement, but the resolution to trial a medically supervised injecting centre was the subject of heated debate.


It was of little surprise that yesterday’s announcement by the NSW Government to end the “trial” status of the Medically Supervised Injecting Centre in Kings Cross again triggered serious discussion. Our decision was not taken lightly.

Neither was the decision in 2001 to introduce the centre following the Drug Summit. Through the 1990s, the seriousness of the drug problem had intensified. Kings Cross had become a particular hotspot, as the area with the highest concentration of overdose deaths in the country.

The Government recognised a new approach was needed to reach marginalised and long term-injecting drug users, many who had never sought treatment before.

Put simply, the Government had to deal with the world as it was, rather than as we would like it to be.

The centre gave users a supervised location where they could access emergency help, medical advice, and support and counseling services.

From the outset the centre has been bound by strict objectives, and rigorously evaluated against those objectives.

These objectives are that the centre decrease drug overdose deaths; provide a gateway into treatment and counseling; reduce the problem of discarded needles and users injecting in public places; and help reduce the spread of diseases like HIV and Hepatitis C.

Our announcement yesterday to introduce legislation to remove the trial status reflects the centre’s overwhelming success against these objectives.

After nine years of successful trials and extensive monitoring, we can say clearly that this is a facility that saves lives, helps drug users with their addiction and improves living conditions for local residents.

Among many findings, the most recent independent evaluation of the centre found that it had successfully managed 3,426 overdoses, referred more than 8,500 drug users for help, including 3,870 to drug treatment, and helped reduce the proportion of local residents who report seeing public injecting from 55 per cent in 2000 to 27 per cent in 2010.

Yesterday at the centre I met Kings Cross Local Area Commander, Superintendent Tony Crandell, who described how his officers had encountered far fewer cases of drug overdoses in the backlanes of Kings Cross since the centre started operating.

The evidence stacks up, and the time is right to make this centre a recurrent health program.

Many supporters of the centre have asked why the decision has taken so long. Given the weight of evidence, it’s a reasonable question.

The Government has taken a considered approach. The injecting centre is not one that falls within the usual definitions of treatment, and it has been prudent to allow the centre to demonstrate its effectiveness over a longer period of time.

The removal of the trial status now means the future of the centre won’t repeatedly be a political football.

The centre will still be subject to stringent monitoring. There will continue to be regular statutory evaluations every five years, an independent evaluation after four years, and NSW Health will continue to conduct routine inspections of the centre.

Staff at the Medically Supervised Injecting Centre do a tough job under difficult circumstances. They are saving the lives of some of the most marginalised people in the state – helping them get treatment and, for some, turning lives around.

The decision will give the centre greater certainty about its future, and allow it to attract and retain quality staff, and continue to reach out to people in need.

I look forward to introducing the legislation to the parliament in coming weeks.


The Punch
 
Shazza says:
10:14am | 16/09/10

I have worked in drug treatment for close to a decade, and so whilst some of the opinions above do not surprise me as such, I continue to be disheartened that the simplistic and one dimensional understanding of drug users as “low lifes” and “junkies” still prevails. I will not regale you with amazing tales of triumph against all the odds, my continued amazement at the strength and resilience of the human spirit and people’s desire to improve themselves even in the face of societal hostility and revulsion because there is not room here.

What I will say is that those who believe we should allow drug users to die in the gutter whilst more “productive” members of society are cared for, can I remind readers that drug users don’t exist in isolation: they are the mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, husbands, wives, sons and daughters of other people who love them, even if the behaviour of drug users takes it toll on them over the months and years.

Drug use is an incredibly complex social and health problem and for it to be reduced to “dealing drugs is criminal, therefore supporting drug users to continue to use props up crime” is reminiscent of the argument that we should let asylum seekers drown at sea because we don’t want to encourage the scourge of people smuggling. Anything that keeps people (for they are people, remember) alive and disease free is a successful public health initiative and I just hope we open a safe injecting site in Melbourne soon.

Good to hear. :)
 
This is great news and a baby step in a better direction. What saddens me is to read some of the ignorance posted on many of the news articles from people who clearly have not read a word of the article or understood at all what the article says. Just zero tolerance kill every junkie scum piece of shit druggie and that will solve the problem. You can almost guarantee that if somebody says the word 'druggie' that whatever follows will be garbage. I know its not really a representative sample of the population but that anybody can be so callous towards another human being because they choose to do drugs is a reflection of how good propaganda and fear mongering can be.
 
Top