• Neuroscience & Pharmacology Discussion Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Recent Journal Articles Chemistry Mega-Thread
    FREE Chemistry Databases! Self-Education Guide

  • N&PD Moderators: Skorpio

Rti-126

One of these days when I'm really bored I'll set up a facebook page for crack cocaine and send friend requests to everyone I ever met.
 
Jamshyd said:
Wow, it appears to have its very own facebook page...

What the fuck are these vendors up to this time?
Click to expand...

That's an auto-generated page made by Facebook, using public domain material from Wikipedia. So you can blame Facebook, it has nothing to do with a vendor or anyone else. There's even Facebook pages for "screwdrivers" and "candy canes", so go knock yourself out. :)
 
I am fucking pissed off with seeing threads that go on the lines of "coming soon to a vendor..."
or "a vendor has...."
this serves no useful purpose whatsoever beyond advertising some substance and the vendor and I don't think Bluelight should provide a place for vendors to build product hype in order to rip people off, see the APB debacle.

it is extremely unlikely RTI 126 will ever be available especially to the kind of vendor that uses facebook to hype their products, simple economics applies here. I would expect this to be some random mixture of crap unrelated to RTI 126, or if it is a related compound it is a phenylpiperidine.

the one truth in all of this is that a fool and their money is easily parted.
 
i have to agree with vecktor here...

i bet if you order this you will get a nice ammount of dimethocaine or some other crappy substance
 
So why don't we - or better you - establish an adequate rule here in ADD? Would be the best solution to educate people. Personally, I can't see anything good coming from the so-called RC vendors. Their just accelerators of prohibition. Most of them are quite unethical, too... :|

Or to put it with FnB's words:
No more threads with vendor names
Click to expand...
Word!


- Murphy
 
It's not being advertised on facebook. the only place outside of here it was ever mentioned was that it's available for preorders from a bulk supplier. And I've said far too much already, so I'll just shut my yapper.

Vendors do some dumb shit, but y'all are tilting at windmills this time.
 
Well shit, started quite a mess here. Wasn't trying to endorse anyone, just hoping to find out a little about the stuff, seeing as it seems likely to be showing up in human test subjects soon. To that point, does anyone know anything beyond 5x the potency of cocaine? That figure comes from wiki, not the supplier. Which doesn't make it reliable of course, and tells you nothing of it's recreational value. Napthylrone is potent, but that doesn't mean I'd buy the stuff.

Is there some reason to believe this difficult stuff to synth? Not asking how mind you, just wondering if there is some reason beyond not having seen it before to think it won't be/
 
Last edited:
fryingsquirrel said:
Is there some reason to believe this difficult stuff to synth? Not asking how mind you, just wondering if there is some reason beyond not having seen it before to think it won't be/
Click to expand...

Well, it's got a tropane and an oxadiazole in the same molecule, both of which are a lot more complicated than something like a JWH. Plus, the obvious precursor is ecgonine, which is tightly controlled.
 
atara said:
Well, it's got a tropane and an oxadiazole in the same molecule, both of which are a lot more complicated than something like a JWH. Plus, the obvious precursor is ecgonine, which is tightly controlled.
Click to expand...
I realize cocaine analogs will be a much more complex syth than JWH, I really meant compared to dimethocaine. Is that a much simpler (no details) synth than other cocaine analogs? If it isn't I wonder why it is so common since it is worthless by all acounts I've read.
 
I haven't heard dimethocaine described as worthless; at the least it beat the hell out of diclofensine and naphyrone. I know it's highly cardiotoxic at effective doses, though.

It is much simpler to make, and from significantly cheaper precursors, yes.
 
well it seems the OP could be right. very interesting news, but most likely some other substance. What should we know regards to harm reduction if we assume it is rti-126
 
RTI-126 seems like an obvious scam to me, because the most likely synthetic route proceeds via an intermediate which is stronger than RTI-126 itself...why would anyone in their right mind go to all the trouble of synthesising the first compound and then go through extra steps just to make it weaker again? Unless they have a whole bunch of different phenyltropanes for sale of which this is just one, then they are almost certainly scammers, or onsellers who have been deceived by their supplier themselves...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top