• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: Tronica

News: 'Legal highs': the lowdown on a law enforcer's nightmare

bit_pattern

Ex-Bluelighter
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
8,127
NEWS
ASHER MOSES
July 21, 2010 - 12:15PM

legalhighsmain-420x0.jpg

Examples of some of the "legal highs" sold online. Photo: Craig Sillitoe

Internet sellers of illicit substances and so-called "legal highs" are undercutting street drug dealers by mailing their wares direct to homes, circumventing drug controls.

Australian Customs and Border protection is battling to stay abreast of the online trade and said Australian customers - which it said included children - may be unwittingly breaking the law as drugs marketed by online pharmacies as "legal highs" contain ingredients that are illegal to import to Australia.

The drugs, sold as substitutes to more common illegal substances such as ecstasy and marijuana, are sold under names including Giggle, Diablo, Hardcore, Spice and e-Blast, "plus many others", Customs said.

legalhighs2main-420x0.jpg

Mephedrone, street name "Miaow Miaow", is sold online as an amphetamine substitute.

According to Customs, some are simply caffeine-based while others have controlled ingredients like ephedrine, one of the precursors of methamphetamine. They are sent through the post and Customs says "many packages are opened and assessed each day", but it cannot screen them all.

An Australian website has been set up dedicated to reviewing these "legal highs", called gethigh.com.au. Its methods are far from scientific.

Diablo sells online for $16 for a two pack but none of the sellers list the ingredients, other than describing them as "herbal". By comparison, ecstasy tablets sell on the street for about $30 each. Diablo is described on gethigh.com.au as "one of the strongest legal highs in pill form on the market".

Another drug identified by Customs as being sold online as a legal high is mephedrone, which is known on the street as "meow meow". Users of the drug, which costs $100 a gram compared to $300 for a gram of MDMA, say its effects are similar to the euhporia experienced on ecstasy.

The synthetic compound is usually swallowed in capsules or snorted and is based on cathinone compounds found in khat, the east African plant that is chewed for an amphetamine-like stimulant effect.

With mephedrone now illegal in many countries, including Australia, sellers have moved to a new amphetamine-like substance, naphyrone, sold online as NRG-1.

Names and ingredients of drugs sold online change weekly, making them difficult to detect and ban, and while seizure figures were unavailable, Customs said "detections are common".

Paul Dillon, founder of Drug and Alcohol Research and Training Australia, said sellers of the drugs were using methods such as Facebook to promote them and it was difficult to gauge the health effects because the substances kept changing to avoid the law.

"Customs and law enforcement really just can't keep up with it because they have no idea what's going on," he said in a phone interview, adding it was "luck of the draw" as to whether packages were intercepted by Customs.

Alex Wodak, director of the alcohol and drug service at St Vincent's Hospital, said in a phone interview that some of the substances ordered online would be safe while others were very dangerous, but it was impossible to know for sure as there has been little scientific testing.

"For me this is just another illustration of the futility of drug prohibition ... and if criminalising drugs hasn't worked, what you need to do is treat drugs as a health and social phenomenon," he said.

The Wall Street Journal reported that the so-called "legal highs" had been blamed for the deaths of two young people in Britain and Sweden and British authorities said they may have contributed to as many as 30 deaths.

The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction identified 24 new "psychoactive substances" last year, almost double the number reported in 2008.

Customs does not have the legal authority to shut down online sites selling the drugs but said it had forced some to include warnings of Australian import restrictions.

"Many products advertised as legal highs contain only legal ingredients such as caffeine, while others have been identified as having controlled ingredients such as ephedrine and are not legal to import without permission," Customs said in a statement.

"However it is nearly impossible to produce lists of those products that are legal and those that are controlled as the ingredients often vary between samples of the same product, or are changed over time."

In a submission to the Parliamentary Joint Select Committee on Cyber-Safety, Customs said it had come into contact with a number of minors who had used the internet to attempt to import the prohibited items.

It cited the International Narcotics Control Board saying "illicit sales of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances through websites has risen, making the internet a major source of drugs for drug abusers".

Source: smh.com.au
 
Why are they so desperate to stop people getting high?

In regards to the reference to NRG-1, I got an email from what I consider to be a reputable source claiming the contents were analysed and found to contain MDPV as opposed to naphyrone.
 
^Fuck knows... They could worry about the growing meth epidemic, and the rising costs causing physical and financial ruin to users and try quell that industry, but instead they hit up RCs and Empathogens.. It's ridiculous.

Which truly causes more harm?

Their war on the RC market, for each new banned chem, another name pops up - and they sell off their old stock as "bullshit-1", and get a new chem that circumvents the law.

Soon we'll see a universal UN law banning all analogues in all UN countries, or blanket bans on all psychoactive, or possibly psychoactive recreational substances.
 
Soon we'll see a universal UN law banning all analogues in all UN countries, or blanket bans on all psychoactive, or possibly psychoactive recreational substances.

A blanket ban on every psychoactive drug, known or unknown would be the only way to make some legal progress in this situation.

For so many obscure and unknown chemicals to "maybe have contributed to" 30 deaths is a god send and they still try to demonize this easy target. Mephedrone was banned after they made out that it had killed people. Toxicology reports later proved that it alone hasn't killed anyone...

They'll never stop this market. Not even the best customs in the world has the ability to check every package that enters the country and most packages wouldn't even raise an eyebrow as they only contain tiny amounts.

These chemicals will continue to kick prohibition in the nuts for years to comes and I can see it getting worse before it gets any better.

Go China! I can't help but think this is pay back for the west forcing them into the opium trade many years ago. How ironic :)
 
Why are they so desperate to stop people getting high?
I think we can go even further and ask, why do people want to get high? The list could truly go on forever but at least we know the primary reasons as to why individuals do consume these psychoactive substances. Why is this such a bad thing? What's the difference between the detrimental health effects of these research chemicals and classical compounds and why is the former legal?

From what I've read over the past years with respect to classical compounds (cannabis, MDMA, etc.) it seems as if prohibition's focal point relies primarily on bad quality substances in which the effects are completely unknown to the user (e.g buying ecstasy and consuming piperazines instead of MDMA). The government has effectively created this problem through heavily restricting MDMA consumption and production leaving a demand that can't be for filled which to some degree effectively feeds the research chemical market, these chemicals are of high quality with generally all information being anecdotal. Where is the logic in that? Going from chemicals which have been tested through time and to a point in scientific research as well compared to compounds which come fresh off the truck every couple of months with no information whatsoever? I mean MDMA could be harmful (not according to Peroutka 1990) despite the whole argument but the message which is being conveyed is that MDMA isn't bad but the impurities and other drugs namely these research chemicals which are added are, yet they are still legal?

Peroutka, SJ 1990, Ecstasy: the clinical, pharmacological, and neurotoxicological effects of the drug MDMA, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts.
 
They may figure out a way to have every single package screened in future. I'm sure they're working on something right now just because such packages are making a mockery out of customs and prohibition.

People are always going to get high. You stop one source and another (usually more dangerous) way of getting high will surface.

Prohibition doesn't work. It never has and it never will. It is a floored concept perpetuated by people who have a hard time accepting the facts.

Stop us from using imported chemicals and we will go back to nature.

The unwinnable war continues to waste tax payers money and give non-violent people criminal records while making vendors and dealers filthy rich.

What a beautiful free country we live in :\
 
Mankind has sought to alter his conciousness since the dawn of time, nothing new here.

Banning what we've done for millions of years is pointless. We'll keep trying.
 
I donno why they even bother. Every year there are literally multiple dozens if not hundreds of new RCs. Legal high are shit anyway. They are either have crap effects, make u sick or have really bad side effects which mite come out in the future. I just dont understand why is Australia so harsh with the laws? If we are licking America and Englands ass then why dont we follow them?
 
yeah the christian lobby has this country by the balls boys. A hand in all the major parties back pockets... you can't vote liberal or labor, and probably greens too without the christian lobby getting a nice share of the pie.
 
All these laws are backwards and have only been around for a fraction of human existence. Less than a hundred years in fact.

Funny how religion most likely started with the use of psychoactive substances and today some religious groups demonize drug use. In my home town I would always see the bible bashers picking up anti depressants and benzo's at the chemist. It's all good if it comes from a doctor who is bribed by big drug companies to prescribe their products :\

The South American tribes got it right and were murdered for their beliefs.
 
Last edited:
I think these substances are the first step towards governments realising that the human need to get seriously fucked up will always find a way ;)

Just need to wait a few decades for the baby boomers to kick off and the new generation of politicians to catch on.
 
yeah the christian lobby has this country by the balls boys. A hand in all the major parties back pockets... you can't vote liberal or labor, and probably greens too without the christian lobby getting a nice share of the pie.

Truth brother!

One only has to look at the internet filter for proof. The stupidity of christianity (and *most* religions) is a reflection of the stupidity of man. Man created religion for those that can't accept the simple truth of life; that is all a big mistake. There is no greater being, no one creator. Spirituality with the aid of psychaedelics, now there is something worth believing in <3

The kind of people that do not except the fact that the universe and our whole existance is nothing more than a coincedance are the same kind of people that don't accept mankinds use of psychoactive substances. I say let them wallow in their own stupidity and fear of reality, just don't force your believes upon others like they currently do.

Greens are about the least religiously influenced of the *major* parties in Australia. Unfortunately there is just far too many religious voters out there. It will be interesting so see the shift in Australia's spiritual and religious beliefs in the next 20-30 years. I can see Australia becoming a lot more left-wing in this regard as the elder generation dies out. We can only hope 8)
 
democrats seem to be the only party willing to put forward harm minimisation as a policy.

What else i find laughable is, some hard ass anti-recreational drug person will pipe up and say "well we need penalties like *insert SE Asian country here* where you get whipped or 10 years in jail for drugs, while for one reason or another, not even realise METH and a lot of other drugs are manufactured in these countries and also not mention that these same countries are rife with corruption.


The stupidity and plain ignorance of government is just crazy, if the government was a legitimate company, just about all their employees would be getting the sack for comming up with the current policies
 
I love the "V Pocket Rocket" in the top right hand of the picture. Althought I'd much rather have a couple of those than any of the others pictured.
 
Top