• LAVA Moderator: streaM Freak

College in America

Well, back in the day, to get a nice, cozy office job, all you needed was a High School diploma. Now it seems an undergraduate degree is needed. But I'm sure there's a limit to this. I can't imagine that there will come a day when multiple PhD's are needed to be an office drone.


If there's one society out there that does it right, it's the Amish. None of them have any education, and yet they're all happy working on the farm. That, folks, is the way it should be.
 
You don't need to be amish to understand why their labour model works. When your "economy" is finite and sustainable, you can manage resources much better. It's also interesting to note that in this ideal labour model, capitalism would be eliminated by design.
 
Well, back in the day, to get a nice, cozy office job, all you needed was a High School diploma. Now it seems an undergraduate degree is needed. But I'm sure there's a limit to this. I can't imagine that there will come a day when multiple PhD's are needed to be an office drone.

Well this isn't back in the day. The labour market has changed enormously over the past forty years. High school diplomas (and, incidentally, degrees) are worth less than they once were. Saying that education is a waste of time is stupid and blind. If you want to be more than an office drone you need a degree.

If there's one society out there that does it right, it's the Amish. None of them have any education, and yet they're all happy working on the farm. That, folks, is the way it should be.

Again, willful ignorance dressed up as insight. Education isn't just about getting a job. It is about coming into contact with new ways of understanding the world. It enhances your appreciation of the world around you and gives you new and critical ways of interrogating concepts and processes. While it may come as a surprise to you, a social science degree gives you a better understand of how (gasp) society works, and I am better off for having done one.

On the difficulty issue, when I was an undergraduate the most difficult courses I ever took were in analytical philosophy and contemporary social theory. They were definitely more difficult than, for example, the neuroscience courses that I took as part of my other major.
 
Well... I agree that a degree, period, is worthwhile.

I also agree that many students, being very young, squander the expensive opportunities they're being given.

I also agree that social sciences and humanities at the undergraduate level (with the possible exception of economics) are generally easier than hard sciences.

Finally, I agree that French social theorists generally should only be read by English majors.

Kidding about that last one. Sorry satricon.
 
satricion, I think you misunderstand rant*n*rave. She's essentially saying that social science degrees require a bit more ingenuity when choosing an angle with which to approach the job market, than hard science degrees do. I've seldom met a hard science major who didn't have at least somewhat of an idea what kind of job, or future education, their degree program was likely to lead to. I've met PLENTY of humanities majors, on the other hand, who didn't have a clue what they would, or COULD, do with their degree.

satricion, you're correct that humanities majors CAN make one an attractive candidate for many fine, stable jobs. But this requires that the student has had the required flash of zen-like inspiration and realized that the real jewels her course of study is bestowing upon her are outside-the-box thinking skills, and networking, rather than knowledge of obscure facts. She will need to make ample use of both outside the box thinking skills and networking if she wants any hope of convincing someone she's a proper fit for a job far more prestigious than a retail manager. And no one is going to tell her or teach her these two things in a classroom -- this is something you're just supposed to 'get' on your own.

I know I didn't 'get' it. I majored in Chinese, with minors in Japanese and film studies. I never gave much thought to what I wanted to do with them. I just assumed something good and fitting will come along, so long as I have two major world languages under my belt. I didn't notice that most of my fellow east Asian language majors were also co-majoring in either business or International Politics and Economics, and never gave much consideration to the fact that I had no taste for either business or government work. I was living in another time, and wrongly assumed I was on an escalator. I tried translation and teaching. I was poorly suited to both.

I was, however (once I 'got it') able to convince the admissions committee of one medical school that my above average verbal chops would serve me well in learning the new language of the human body. :)

If I could give one piece of advice to a teenager of mine, it's to not apply to college until you have a very clear idea of what you want to study, what kind of job you're headed towards, and how that field of study can best prepare you for that job. Without a clear idea of these, I'd rather a kid of mine take a couple years off and work, and see firsthand how the real world works, and how he or she will need to prepare to survive in it. College is not a right of passage, or 'just what you do when you're 18.' It's job training, and should be treated as such.

It always amazed me to see the international students from the third world at my undergraduate college. They had a work ethic that was extraordinary. They partied only after big projects were completed, if even then. They sat alone in study rooms and studied, when no one else did. They talked of going home and working alongside the elite of their home nations. They just had a much greater appreciation for what it means to be able to attend college!

Times were that undergraduate education was indeed an escalator to the white-collar work world. So few people in our parents and grandparents' generations even had degrees, that yes, there was literally a decent job waiting for anyone with with one, no matter what they studied. But now that a bachelor's degree is the new high school diploma, students had better give some serious thought as to how they can sell themselves to employers (or graduate schools) better than Joe Schmo English Major.

Hard science programs are more likely to attract practical people, and practical people are more likely to have given serious thought early on as to how they'll make their livelihoods.
 
It is very difficult to plan for the future in this way. There are a few reasons for this. The first is that we live in a period of rapid social change. Often, the places that give young people get information about what degree to get and what job to get are not in step with the realities of the job market (this is particularly true for many parents with higher educated children than themselves). Even if you do have a good idea of what you're going to do after university, putting all your eggs in one basket (so to speak) is not a good idea since the job market is difficult and unstable for new graduates. The second is that there are many jobs which do not have a direct fit with a particular degree. The vast majority of degrees don't lead you straight into a job. The kind of reflection that you're describing is required of all graduates, not just social science grads. Keep in mind that having an undergraduate degree majoring in biology doesn't make you a "biologist" any more than having a politics degree makes you a political scientist. But the knowledge that these degrees give you is transferable across a variety of different jobs. This is important in order to deal with a changing labour market, as well as marketing yourself as the "kind" of person suited to jobs which require critical and analytical thinking, as well as the ability to express yourself well. There are people with economics and sociology degrees working in consulting firms, people with politics and history degrees working for state health departments, and people with science or business degrees working for NGOs, none of whome are "economists" or "sociologists" or "political scientists" or "biologists" or whatever.

Everybody needs to be reflective and active in the current job market, not just humanities graduates. The thing is that they do. People with degrees do better. People with communications degrees don't work at cafes for long. A degree is not an instant passport to a job, but it is extremely important if you want decent, stable, rewarding work.

The fact is that the vast majority of graduates of any discipline wind up in white collar jobs. This is a function of the contemporary labour market, which is increasingly split into white collar "knowledge" jobs held by people with degrees, and the services sector, which tends to be lower paid, more unstable, and full of people without degrees. This is not specific to graduates of any discipline.
 
College is not a right of passage, or 'just what you do when you're 18.' It's job training, and should be treated as such.

I'm back in school because it beats working at any of my previous jobs. Hopefully it opens doors to jobs that beat going to school. When it does, school will no longer be as appealing as work.

Still, it's highly subjective. I see nothing wrong with going to school to experience academia, enjoy the structure and meritocracy, meet people with similar interests, or just stave off working. I find your analysis of school to be rather grim.

Hard science programs are more likely to attract practical people, and practical people are more likely to have given serious thought early on as to how they'll make their livelihoods.

I must be an anomaly then. I enjoy science because it's challenging and fascinating. I discovered my love for science when I was 25; a few years ago.
 
If I could give one piece of advice to a teenager of mine, it's to not apply to college until you have a very clear idea of what you want to study, what kind of job you're headed towards, and how that field of study can best prepare you for that job. Without a clear idea of these, I'd rather a kid of mine take a couple years off and work, and see firsthand how the real world works, and how he or she will need to prepare to survive in it. College is not a right of passage, or 'just what you do when you're 18.' It's job training, and should be treated as such.


This.

This, this, and this

I am attending a specialty engineering school, and looking around me I can say that 90% of the people who attend my school KNOW what they want to do. Compartively, my best friend attends Providence College (a great liberal arts school). He called me up last year laughing because his school, after 2 years of him being "undeclared", had forced him to pick a major. He took a look through the catalog, compared it to what classes he had taken, and picked "accounting". Just like that. Hell, he even got a bit of a kick out of it.

I will also say however, that in my opinion the degree you get is more of a door opener than anything. I know a LOT of adults who are in fields completely unrelated to their major. Take me for example. I am majoring in chemical engineering, and while I would not mind working as an engineer for a bit (stable high-paying job out of college) is it something I'm truly passionate about and love to death? No. My ideal dream would be to own a business. However, I first need experience, money, and connections in the real world. I enjoy science, and while engineering isn't quite what I love most about it, it isn't bad and it has a pretty stable future for me, where eventually I could do something that I REALLY love.
 
MDAO got it pretty much right.

But to elaborate, unless a degree gives you a specific knowledge or skill set, all it is is a piece of paper that proves you can work hard for 4 years and have some level of intelligence. And yes, that WILL get you a job, especially if you're being compared to someone without that piece of paper, but I object to this notion that having a degree somehow makes you a better employee or that the degree has some intrinsic worth beyond proving that you can work reasonably hard to a reasonable standard of quality - lots of people can work hard with high standards, and there are lots of other ways to prove that beyond a 4-year degree. If two people apply for an accounting job, one with an English degree, one with a biochemistry degree, who gets the job? The degree has done nothing. And I'd personally rather hire someone with no degree that had worked in an accounting firm for a year as an intern...

I hate to put on my "math and science are better hat," but what the hell are the thousands of business and communications majors in my graduating class gonna do with their degrees? Do they know? I know what I'll be doing with my BS in biochemistry... There's nothing wrong with getting a business or communications degree, but it's stupid to get one without an end in mind. I shiver when I think about how many people go to college just to go... I honestly think it's fucking up the job market. A lot of people just default into the humanities because they really don't have any ideas - it's not that the majors are bad, but they have become a proxy classification for people that should not be in college...
 
I'd say whether or not an applicant has a 4 year degree is a questionable measure of his work ethic, at best. And I think a 45 min IQ test would be a better measure of his intellect. But, who knows. IQ tests have fallen out of favor among employeers, so maybe they know something I don't.
 
Binge Artist, IQ tests are highly controversial. They're at least as controversial as personality tests when it comes to assessing people for job placement. They may be useful as a rough guide for the clueless job seeker to get a better 'look in the mirror', so to speak, at his own capabilities and talents. But I'd not work for any employer that used either one as an official applicant screening step.

Like it or not, having a 4-year degree is now an established standard benchmark of a person's aptitude for jobs that require critical thinking and accomplishment of long-term goals. Having one basically proves that you will voluntarily devote a very large amount of time, money, and energy to a long term project, and actually see it though to the end. Of course there are many people who are up to such a challenge but haven't had the opportunity to complete a bachelor's degree. But such people will have a harder road ahead of them in convincing employers that they're good investments, who are intellectually up to the job and WON'T QUIT when the going gets tough.

At least, that's how it used to be. Nowadays if I were an employer hiring for a position that was mentally demanding and required deft long-term planning, I'd consider an applicant with no degree but some solid work experience in the field (with proof of accomplishments, i.e. a solid portfolio), over a college grad with a fluff major from a college who accepts anyone with a pulse, who took seven years to get his degree, dropped out once or twice, and graduated with straight Cs.

So I'm still with satricion on recommending that anyone who wants a quality job get a bachelor's degree, simply because it's so standard and universally recognized. But on the other hand, don't be so naive (as I was) to think that ANY bachelor's degree is an automatic key to great jobs.

Remember, all any employer cares about is what you can do for them. All that you do, say, or write in pursuit of a job should be directed squarely at convincing potential employers that they'd be fools not to invest in you, for their sake.
 
If two people apply for an accounting job, one with an English degree, one with a biochemistry degree, who gets the job? The degree has done nothing. And I'd personally rather hire someone with no degree that had worked in an accounting firm for a year as an intern...

Let's hope that employers aren't hiring with your mindset. As a student yourself, don't you find that a little self-defeating?

I hate to put on my "math and science are better hat," but what the hell are the thousands of business and communications majors in my graduating class gonna do with their degrees? Do they know? I know what I'll be doing with my BS in biochemistry... There's nothing wrong with getting a business or communications degree, but it's stupid to get one without an end in mind. I shiver when I think about how many people go to college just to go... I honestly think it's fucking up the job market. A lot of people just default into the humanities because they really don't have any ideas - it's not that the majors are bad, but they have become a proxy classification for people that should not be in college...

A part of me agrees, only because I'm amused imagining a class of non-technical whitebread suburbanites graduating high school with honors and working at Taco Bell. That's the technocrat in me I guess.

On the other hand, we are becoming a less labour-intensive society of people. I feel that higher learning makes sense as a preoccupation in a low-demand market. Even if it confers no 'ditch-digging' benefit to society.
 
MyDoorsAreOpen:

Yep, IQ tests are a bit dated and way controversial. However, I don't think it would be difficult to make a test that measures ones "intellect" in terms of english/writing ability, critical thinking skills, etc. And further, I'd say such a test could be designed that would be a better indicator of a candidate's aptitude than whether or not he has a degree.
 
^ Even if a such a test were made, I really don't think most employers would use it. They just want to skip the psychology and get right to the point: can you do the job? They really don't care how smart someone is as long as they can competently do the job. Plus, nobody wants to be accused of discrimination.

Contrast your proposed test with, say, the US's Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT). The SAT has a very real filtering and stratifying effect on the prospects of people about to finish high school. There's a strong correlation between people who score highly on the SAT and people who most would describe as smart. But at no point does the SAT purport to be a measure of someone's innate intelligence. It is only a measure of what someone CAN DO on two different tasks (mathematical reasoning and verbal comprehension). The point is, someone can be intelligent but poor at the two tasks the SAT tests for, and unfortunately, unofficially filtered out from a lot of colleges' admissions pools. Or one can be quite unintelligent in dealing with many situations, but happen to be good at taking the SAT.

Professions that are more competitive and involve a heavy mental component typically have government-recognized licensing bodies that administer tests to assess candidates' competency in thinking through, in a timely fashion, the problems they're likely to encounter on that job. That pretty much takes care of that problem, without the need for an authoritatively endorsed number that quantifies a person's inherent intelligence, which is inherently controversial.
 
I totally agree with those who have been saying that having a degree just for the sake of a degree is a waste of time. I mean, in the long run the diploma will get you farther than those without one- but with the job market how it is right now, it is unlikely that the perfect job will just land in your lap. Without an idea of what you want to do, you're just fishing around for employment without having taken into account the specific skills you should have focused on in college.

Being a psychology major, I know that simply taking random psych classes and having a bachelors degree will do me little good. To get a decent paying job, I have to go to grad school with a specific purpose, and therefore the classes I am taking now are geared toward what I want to do (which is adolescent and adult counseling). What you focus on to be a counselor or do clinical work in psychology is quite different than what you would focus on to be a research psychologist.

That said, college overall is a great expierence. Balancing the work load with the social aspect is difficult, but IMO thats what these years are for. I don't want to piss away thousands of dollars to attend college just to party all the time and drop out; but at the same time, I don't want to be locked up in a library 24\7. I think it's OK to go to college a little unsure of what you want to do, and spend your first year or so seeing what it's all about. But by the time you are an upper classman, if you don't have a specific goal in mind with your degree, then it really is just a piece of paper.

I also think that importance of a degree depends on the job you seek. Some careers require more "street smarts", and some are more "book smarts". Obviously you wouldn't hire someone to do genetic research simply because of their "people-personality" or ability to lead a group or something... some jobs require a lot of knowledge that you just cannot get if you do not go to college.
 
I don't have time to get into a lengthy discussion about the 'worth' of a Bachelor's degree that doesn't necessarily yield an easier flow-through to the field you desire. I'm content with my lowly history undergrad degree. I would be content even if I hadn't made it into grad school. Furthermore, I would have continued to be a student in those fields if the opportunity hadn't developed for me here in my post-grad degree. It was not a 'waste of time'.

Eye of the beholder, really. What's a waste to you was an amazing developmental period of my life. I wouldn't be where I am emotionally, intellectually, mentally & physically without it. It was the right choice for me. What's more I would have *HATED* my life if I had been forced to focus outside the field which drew me in. What's the point if you don't enjoy what you're doing, if you have the luxury? I'm lucky to have the luxury.

Life is a journey. It sounds a bit like in the same vein as people who travel abroad for several years as a 'waste of money and time'. I can guarantee you many of those people lead more fulfilling, productive, employed lives in fields that they wouldn't have otherwise had they not 'wasted' their time. And yes, I mean directly as a result of what people would have otherwise considered a waste of time before they embarked on their journey.

There is no 'one path' in life. I think your degrees/paths/work is what you make of it, in general. That's a hard but important lesson. It's not so cut and dry.

Sorry this is pretty disjointed but I have to run to class. More later.
 
I don't have time to get into a lengthy discussion about the 'worth' of a Bachelor's degree that doesn't necessarily yield an easier flow-through to the field you desire. I'm content with my lowly history undergrad degree. I would be content even if I hadn't made it into grad school. Furthermore, I would have continued to be a student in those fields if the opportunity hadn't developed for me here in my post-grad degree. It was not a 'waste of time'.

I hope I didn't say anything to offend you AmorRoark :\ I guess "waste of time" was the wrong way of saying it... what I meant was, people who get a degree just to "get a degree", without any passion or goal behind it, just doesn't really make sense to me. You know, like people who go to college just because it's expected, but they choose a major just for the hell of it. I mean, if that's what someone wants to do, I guess it's not really a "waste of time" for them... I just don't personally understand it, but oh well. I don't think there's anything wrong with a degree that doesn't necessarily open a lot of doors, as long as it's something you actually care about learning and gain some kind of knowledge from. To go through college just going through the motions because it's what society expects is a little silly IMO, that's all I meant.

And I hope I didn't come off as saying that I think a bachelor's degree is "lowly"... it certainly isn't. I was simply saying that for MY desired a job, graduate degree is necessary. Hell, I have yet to get any college degree, seeing as I'm still a junior in undergrad, I have no snobbery against any kind of education.. no matter what the field, whether it's an associates, bachelors, or simply a high school diploma, whatever.
 
Last edited:
You didn't offend me TD. I just disagreed with I thought you were saying (but you wereN'T far and away the only person I disagree(d) with on this matter). I see your point now.

I agree that people who just go to college to go and party need a serious wake-up call. Maybe they should be seriously shadow an entry-level manager job at a retail store or restaurant for a week straight. It might just kick them into reality how important it is to take college seriously and find a path that will keep them happy.

*edit: I meant you weren't the only person I disagreed with on this matter love. Man, reading it as directly targeting you really makes me look like a huge bitch. Sorry about that!
 
Last edited:
^^
That's true. I would never tell everybody to go get a degree regardless of their situation or interests, and my other posts on this board reflect that.

But the evidence is clear. A degree will increase your chances of having a good secure job more than anything else will. Insecurity is a feature of the contemporary labour market. Even people with degrees often struggle. But people without them struggle more. A lot more. And it influences the rest of their life in terms of health, family etc. This is only going to get worse as time goes on. Educational inflation will make degrees more necessary, and worth less in terms of job outcomes. Grad school will become more important as the gap between different levels of education increases, and the secondary labour market will become larger. Levels of job dissatisfaction amongst those with degrees are already on the rise, since many of them are doing jobs that you didn't used to need a degree for. The duties haven't changed, but educational inflation has meant that degrees are now more important. But that doesn't mean degrees aren't worth while, since without one levels of dissatisfaction are even higher, and combined with high levels of insecurity and lower pay.

The problem of course is that there's only a certain degree to which you can fight class. Parental class and education level are still strong predictors of educational success and future employment success (this is stronger in countries with more privatised education systems). But the fact remains that if you want to fight against this, or even reproduce the privilege of your parents, a degree is very important.
 
Last edited:
Top