U.N. Says Heroin Production Down, Cocaine Production Down

Tchort

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
2,390
WASHINGTON — Markets for cocaine and opiates such as heroin are leveling off or declining, but stimulants are growing popular in the Middle East and Brazil, the United Nations reports.
After several years of record growth in Afghanistan's opium crop, the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime reported Wednesday that the number of acres devoted to opium there dropped 19% in 2008. Cultivation of opium poppies declined in parts of the country with more government security, the report said. Most of the opium now comes from the Helmand province in the south.

Afghanistan produces more than 90% of the world's opium supply.

The opium crop in Laos and Burma — the other major producers of the drug — held steady.

The U.N. also reported an 18% decline in Colombia's coca crop, the plant used to produce cocaine. The Colombian government has a robust program to destroy the coca plants and dismantle processing labs. Colombia grows most of the world's coca.

Crops in Peru and Bolivia, the other significant coca producers, increased slightly from 2007.

In the United States, prices for cocaine have risen and purity has declined, indicating a tight market, said Antonio Maria Costa, executive director of the U.N. office.

Stimulant use is leveling off in Europe and North America, the report found, but it is growing in Southeast Asia, which favors a stimulant called Yaba. It is also increasing in the Gulf countries in the Middle East, especially Saudi Arabia, where the synthetic amphetamine Captagon is popular among affluent young people who use it a sexual stimulant, the report said. Ingredients often include amphetamine and caffeine.

The United States, to curtail methamphetamine production, restricts sales and imports of pseudoephedrine, the chemical used to make the drug.

As restrictions on the drugs in the U.S. and Europe grew tighter, drug traffickers looked for new customers in other countries, Costa said in an interview.

"It is worrisome," he said of rising drug use in Saudi Arabia. "The country is new to drugs. They have not set up a structure to deal with it. The seizure of synthetic drugs in Saudi Arabia was greater than the sum of what was seized in the United States and China combined."

Researchers use satellite photos and ground surveys to measure cocaine and opium crops. Synthetic drugs, which are made in labs, are estimated using seizure and other data.

In the report, Costa called on U.N. countries to shift law enforcement crackdowns from drug users to drug traffickers. Drug use, he said, should be treated as a health issue.

By Donna Leinwand

6/25/2009

USAToday


http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2009-06-24-worlddrugs_N.htm

EDIT:

The Economist

6/25/2009


The retail and wholesale prices of heroin in America have fallen dramatically since the early 1990s. One gram of heroin in the retail market cost $131 in 2007, the lowest price since UN records began in 1990. The $60 margin between wholesale and retail prices in 2007 was also a record low, suggesting an increasingly competitive retail market. American wholesale prices remain at around twice the level in Western Europe. The UN estimates that annual opiate production—almost all of which is from Afghanistan—jumped to about 8,900 tonnes in 2007, having been flat at around 4,500 tonnes over the previous decade. Seizures of heroin rose to 65 tonnes in 2007 but were still only a small fraction of global production.

http://www.economist.com/markets/indicators/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13917432
 
What about abuse of prescription opioids?

TFA said:
Researchers use satellite photos and ground surveys to measure cocaine and opium crops.

What if they are starting to grow indoors?
 
Last edited:
As much as people like to tweak statistics, production going down does not mean anything. The US pays top dollar for heroin and cocaine, so even if production were cut down even more %ages, it would still mean nothing; the US will still have plenty of heroin and cocaine.
 
the fact that production of these CROPS have been declining has been suggested ( I believe by a writer in the Guardian UK) that its due to an increase in base food prices, which makes alternative substitutes viable...

..highly plausable but no facts =/
 
well i cant say that i notice any shortage.. bags are still readily availible and havent like gotten progressively worse or anything over the last year... so the shit is still gettin over lol
 
well i cant say that i notice any shortage.. bags are still readily availible and havent like gotten progressively worse or anything over the last year... so the shit is still gettin over lol

This is my point exactly. Even if global production falls, US demand and the high price we pay dictates that global drug traffickers will target the US first, because of the highest profit margins available over here.

This is why production rates of cocaine and heroin mean little to nothing.
 
heroin in th US is incredibly cheap compared to countries like Australia. but there are less users in Australia due to a much smaller population.
 
maybe they purposely kept production low so that their product would be worth more money. considering the global recession and the recent over production of opium in the past few years maybe the opium growers were just playing safe with their crop.

definitely surprising about Saudi Arabia having more synthetics than the US and China combined. maybe they have stricter boarders? so people make everything in country? or maybe it's just easier to get busted?
 
I agree with most that it won't make a difference... just like the War on Drugs has made no impact whatsoever on the amount of youth being "tainted" each and every generation.

I might also add that who really knows the truth when it comes down to reports like this... how the hell does the UN have any idea exactly how much of an illegal crop is made by ANY particular country. The crop is grown for illegal purposes so obviously the growers are not trying to let the details of their operation or the scale of production be known to anyone, ESPECIALLY authorities!!

Maybe I'm sounding conspiracy theory-ish for no reason but really, how much merit to reports like these have?? I would not be the least bit surprised if a lot of it was just DEA propaganda... trying to show the public they are at least making SOME headway in a war (on drugs) that any fool knows is lost already and can never be won.

It just creates a lot of jobs and revenue for snobby, straightlaced assholes who like to tell others how to live their lives.
 
The means to judge the success of the War On Drugs has changed over time. It used to be number of arrests. Then it was total amount of drugs confiscated each week/month/quarter/year. Now they have a strange integration of treatment admissions, arrests made, total drugs confiscated, estimated amount of drugs manufactured in source countries, all tied together to judge whether certain strategies or extra funding are making an impact. It's a pretty superfluous system; throwing everything against the wall and seeing what sticks.
 
Top