'Nice people take drugs' ads pulled from London buses

a thing

Greenlighter
Joined
Nov 5, 2008
Messages
864
See also this thread

'Nice people take drugs' ads pulled from London buses
Chief executive of Release, the charity behind the adverts, accuses advertising regulators of censorship

* Mary O'Hara
* guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 9 June 2009 16.30 BST

The chief executive of leading drugs and humans rights charity Release today accused advertising regulators of censorship after the body's ad campaign was withdrawn from London buses.

Release said it has been told its campaign, which incorporates posters on the sides of buses in the capital that read "Nice people take drugs", is to be removed and that the strapline needs to be altered to temper the message before the ads can be reinstated.

Sebastian Saville, the chief executive of Release added that the removal of the "Nice people take drugs" adverts from buses was an overreaction to a legitimate message.

The charity was told yesterday by CBS Outdoor, the billboard advertising company that booked the bus campaign on its behalf, that the inclusion of the words, "also" or "too" would make the ads less likely to be attract complaints and ensure they fit non-broadcast advertising codes of practice.

Saville said he found if difficult to understand why the campaign might be misconstrued.

He said: "The Nice People Take Drugs campaign is about getting people to think about drug use in our society and for politicians to stop being so frightened of having an open debate on how to more effectively deal with the current situation. I am deeply concerned."

Saville suggested the move reflected a broader climate in which politicians and regulators seek to stifle debate on drugs and bend to pressure from "moral crusaders".

Release is known for challenging mainstream approaches to drugs policy. The charity's latest advertising campaign is part of a wider strategy to challenge drugs policy and attitudes in the UK to drug use and to users.

Saville said getting their message across was vital to constructive debate. "I believe that the time has come where potential leaders of our country have much to gain from real honesty about drug use in the UK, including their own drug use," he added. "The intellectual debate on drug control has been won and we must stop allowing politicians to adopt fundamentalist and unscientific policies solely out of fear of upsetting a handful of moral crusaders."

A spokesman for CBS Outdoor told MediaGuardian.co.uk the ads were being take down because of an "oversight" by the company when it booked the campaign.

He said CBS should have run the copy past CAP – the Committee of Advertising Practice – which offers advice on compliance with advertising codes of practice.

"We should have run it past CAP before the ads went up. It is common practice to seek advice on copy that might be dubious," the spokesman added.

He said CBS ran the copy past CAP after bus companies carrying the campaign contacted the company with concerns about how the adverts might be interpreted.

"Buses are a particularly sensitive area," the spokesman added. "People really do see them as much more integral to their communities – more than posters or local radio, I think – and so the advertisments on them are very carefully considered."

Release has been offered replacement advertising space on buses at the end of June if new copy is approved – but this seems unlikely to placate Saville.

He denied he was challenging the need for codes of practice in advertising but added moves to mute "what are clearly not" offensive messages need to be challenged.

"This has been an extremely popular campaign right from launch. I am deeply concerned that without even a single complaint from the public there are systems in place that can decide what we can and can't talk about. I would suggest this is nothing less than censorship," Savile said.

• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email [email protected] or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jun/09/nice-people-drugs-ads-pulled
 
Thats uncalled for. Nice people take drugs- Its a powerful statement/fact; I guess it was too powerful so once someone up top sat on a 3foot stick they bitched hard & took it down.
 
this is too bad. I thought these ads were clever and it made me happy when I learned about them last week.
 
Well, its pretty clear to me that there are hordes of drug users...

...that are genuinley nice, fun, all around quite pleasent people to be around. But the question I have (Just ur question but with a twist of superiority) Will make for much better discussion.....And that question IS:

Nice people sell drugs. The specturm of different dealers one will meet in their pursuit for drugs is a enormous one. Some dealers, (myself included when this type of activity was apart of my life are nice, friendly one day and the next day they dont have the time of day for ur broke ass 40 rock. This happens a lot cuz its HEKTIC....

Ok Im gonna let this be known now I been up on crack for 2 days and took some Halcion and am feeling chattty, it just feels good to press the keys. I saw the words nice people take drugs in th subject and thats what Ive got myself believing this topic is about...nuthing to do with london buses

Any way Im gonna just end this post like this, if anyone is interested in a discussion with some of the shit Ive said, just comment on something I said and maybe Ill create my own topic
 
Hopefully they accept a revised version of the message. This is bullshit but unsurprising.
it's surprising to me. the message is not controversial at ALL. it's pure censorship from people with a very clear agenda influenced by emotion
 
I can see how it is controversial, it shouldn't be but pretty much any pro illicit drug use or acknlowledgement that it isn't just the scum of society who use is controversial in this day and age.

I can see a big difference in the percieved message between "nice people take drugs" and "nice people can take drugs" or "nice people also take drugs", for young children who don't understand the message could be interpreted that drug use is a good thing to do, rather than an activity that does not exclude good natured people.

I am not against the original message at all, but when you consider it in that context it is obvious how a revised version would likely be deemed more appropriate.
 
Most "normal" people that i know who are drug users are very quiet about it, wouldn't want their image dirty..
I'm quite the opposite, very open about it... i say fukkem, they can deal with it.
If they can talk about getting drunk and doing stupid shit (which is much more harmful then me smoking in my opinion) then i can talk about getting stoned and raving off gutters =]

Its the things you do everyday that are the biggies, not the occasional fun times...
A large majority of the population eat like absolute pigs, no nutrition whatsoever... Im slim and fit, yet I'm the one who's unhealthy cause i smoke and am too skinny?? They are just jealous of my excellent eating habits and abs =p
cool.

I top the class, get distinctions, rave, smoke... but to a lesser degree now because i still want to maintain a healthy brain that can operate efficiently within the workplace..
Been applying for jobs and first impressions count, don't want to be too sketchy =]
 
Top